Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Crunchball 3000 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

219:. Ergo, it provides more information about the topic of the game, and allows people who see this and are interested to find out more about the game and maybe play it. In order to avoid any false accusations, I will state now that I am not employed by Armor Games, Free Web Arcade, etc. and won't benefit in any way from this being put up. 211:: This game is on various websites. Knowledge (XXG) contains articles about such things as tiny towns in Switzerland which no one has ever heard of, it can include something like this. As a specific example, when I hit the "Random Article" button, I got this: 250:
What we're trying to measure is not the importance of a topic (in part because we don't even want to start debating the meaning of the word "importance"). We're trying to establish "notability" in the following sense
158: 305:
sites the game is on. And like I said, I really like the game, but no one has ever written a newspaper/magazine article or book about it. One of the criteria, as Pichpich said, is that the sources have to be
119: 365: 152: 413: 353: 289: 235: 472:
on E4 (not yet cited). That's all the sources I can find after a good long search. I think it just about has enough coverage to satisfy
92: 87: 255:? Even the tiniest town in Switzerland has hundreds of years of thoroughly documented existence and therefore easily passes the test. 96: 17: 383: 79: 173: 140: 567: 371: 359: 40: 285: 231: 480: 134: 546: 512: 483: 449: 427: 405: 344: 319: 264: 239: 212: 202: 130: 61: 465: 277: 223: 216: 83: 563: 508: 281: 227: 57: 36: 180: 477: 75: 67: 445: 335:: I've played this game. It's really fun. It's well-designed. It's not notable in the slightest. - 253:
has the topic received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
166: 524: 493: 260: 198: 193:. Non-notable online free flash game. No significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. 542: 423: 401: 340: 315: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
562:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
458: 377: 146: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
504: 53: 252: 190: 473: 273:
Have a look at the changes, but you might be right. Robert 23:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
462: 256: 194: 535: 469: 419: 397: 336: 311: 113: 438:
No indication of notability. No references, just the site of the game itself.
527:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
496:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
468:(both now cited in the article). There is also a squib of reception detail 310:
of the topic, meaning that sites that host the game don't count. -
556:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
476:, though not a clear keep from me because of how limited it is. 301:
I looked at the changes, and the only references now are the
390: 109: 105: 101: 165: 534:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 503:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 179: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 570:). No further edits should be made to this page. 354:list of video game-related deletion discussions 215:. Finally, it is mentioned in another article: 8: 412:Note: This debate has been included in the 352:Note: This debate has been included in the 457:The game was given an extensive review at 414:list of Games-related deletion discussions 411: 382: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 388: 24: 376: 1: 370: 364: 191:general notability threshold 358: 587: 547:07:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 62:01:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 513:00:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 484:16:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 461:, a piece was written by 450:22:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 428:19:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 406:19:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 345:18:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 320:00:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 265:22:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 240:21:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 203:18:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 559:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 213:Emerson Orlando de Melo 217:Monkey Island (series 189:Does not pass the 48:The result was 549: 515: 430: 417: 408: 294: 280:comment added by 243: 226:comment added by 578: 561: 539: 533: 529: 502: 498: 443: 418: 395: 394: 393: 386: 380: 374: 368: 362: 351: 293: 282:Robert the Devil 274: 242: 228:Robert the Devil 220: 184: 183: 169: 117: 99: 34: 586: 585: 581: 580: 579: 577: 576: 575: 574: 568:deletion review 557: 537: 522: 491: 439: 389: 357: 275: 221: 126: 90: 76:Crunchball 3000 74: 71: 68:Crunchball 3000 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 584: 582: 573: 572: 552: 551: 550: 531: 530: 519: 518: 517: 516: 500: 499: 488: 487: 486: 452: 432: 431: 409: 348: 347: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 296: 295: 268: 267: 245: 244: 187: 186: 123: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 583: 571: 569: 565: 560: 554: 553: 548: 545: 544: 541: 540: 532: 528: 526: 521: 520: 514: 510: 506: 501: 497: 495: 490: 489: 485: 482: 479: 475: 471: 467: 464: 463:Kieron Gillen 460: 456: 453: 451: 447: 442: 437: 434: 433: 429: 425: 421: 415: 410: 407: 403: 399: 392: 385: 379: 373: 367: 361: 355: 350: 349: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 330: 321: 317: 313: 309: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 291: 287: 283: 279: 272: 271: 270: 269: 266: 262: 258: 254: 249: 248: 247: 246: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 218: 214: 210: 207: 206: 205: 204: 200: 196: 192: 182: 178: 175: 172: 168: 164: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 132: 129: 128:Find sources: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 558: 555: 543: 536: 523: 492: 459:Jay Is Games 454: 440: 435: 332: 307: 302: 276:— Preceding 222:— Preceding 208: 188: 176: 170: 162: 155: 149: 143: 137: 127: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 505:Ron Ritzman 308:independent 153:free images 54:Ron Ritzman 564:talk page 455:Weak keep 441:North8000 420:• Gene93k 398:• Gene93k 37:talk page 566:or in a 525:Relisted 494:Relisted 290:contribs 278:unsigned 257:Pichpich 236:contribs 224:unsigned 195:Pichpich 120:View log 39:or in a 538:Wifione 481:another 478:Someone 337:Jorgath 312:Jorgath 159:WP refs 147:scholar 93:protect 88:history 436:Delete 333:Delete 131:Google 97:delete 174:JSTOR 135:books 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 509:talk 474:WP:N 470:here 466:here 446:talk 424:talk 402:talk 391:Talk 341:talk 316:talk 303:four 286:talk 261:talk 232:talk 209:Keep 199:talk 167:FENS 141:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 356:. ( 181:TWL 118:– ( 511:) 448:) 426:) 416:. 404:) 396:) 384:RS 343:) 318:) 292:) 288:• 263:) 238:) 234:• 201:) 161:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:. 507:( 444:( 422:( 400:( 387:· 381:· 378:S 375:· 372:B 369:· 366:N 363:· 360:G 339:( 314:( 284:( 259:( 230:( 197:( 185:) 177:· 171:· 163:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 138:· 133:( 125:( 122:) 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ron Ritzman
talk
01:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Crunchball 3000
Crunchball 3000
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
general notability threshold
Pichpich
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.