223:
that looks like it is a news article, seems highly suspicious: "Other security analysts recommend computer users at least use secure email programs such as CryptoHeaven"... Other security analysts = who? I would recommend a Delete or, if we were talking about the software, a weak delete and possibly
160:
However the sources only make the very briefest mention to an "application" called "CryptoHeaven" referencing www.cryptoheaven.com, so it certainly is not a generic term. Also, the sources do not establish notability as they are technical manuals and white papers, again most only mentioning the name
216:
I went through
Pontificalibus' same process and I found, in agreement with everyone here, that (a) all references to this "term" seem to really be references to the software, and that (b) the software is probably not notable--although there are things that show up in a google news search:
156:
Non-notable software masquerading as neologism. Contested PROD stating "the article is not about any particular software application, but a generic term; the article establishes notability per WP:N listing 5 sources"
89:
199:- This is the second nomination for the same name. It appears from the first AfD that the previous article was written with an eye towards the company (rather than as a term). The result was delete.
241:
This article seems to be inventing the term "cryptoheaven" as all of the references only refer to a specific piece of software and not as a general term for a type of software app.
149:
84:
220:, they are mostly press-releases or other material originating from the company. Also, I notice many of them come from mathaba.net, and this article:
164:
I can't find thrid-party sources to establish notability, google turns up many download pages etc but I didn't find any reliable articles.
62:
17:
116:
111:
218:
250:
233:
208:
191:
173:
120:
68:
103:
265:
36:
264:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
169:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
246:
107:
204:
187:
165:
52:
49:
99:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
242:
229:
200:
183:
182:- Good research by the nom. I think it's advertising masquerading as a neologism.
137:
225:
221:
258:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
144:
133:
129:
125:
90:
Articles for deletion/CryptoHeaven (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
268:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
82:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
81:
85:Articles for deletion/CryptoHeaven
24:
1:
285:
261:Please do not modify it.
251:06:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
234:19:40, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
224:a delete for that too.
209:19:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
192:19:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
174:10:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
69:04:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
80:AfDs for this article:
44:The result was
276:
263:
147:
141:
123:
65:
60:
55:
34:
284:
283:
279:
278:
277:
275:
274:
273:
272:
266:deletion review
259:
143:
114:
98:
95:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
282:
280:
271:
270:
254:
253:
236:
211:
194:
166:Pontificalibus
154:
153:
94:
93:
92:
87:
79:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
281:
269:
267:
262:
256:
255:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
235:
231:
227:
222:
219:
215:
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
195:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
162:
161:and website.
158:
151:
146:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
91:
88:
86:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
260:
257:
238:
213:
196:
179:
163:
159:
155:
100:CryptoHeaven
75:CryptoHeaven
45:
43:
31:
28:
243:Timmie.merc
201:Shadowjams
184:Shadowjams
150:View log
117:protect
112:history
50:King of
239:Delete
226:Cazort
214:Delete
180:Delete
145:delete
121:delete
46:delete
148:) – (
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
247:talk
230:talk
205:talk
197:Note
188:talk
170:talk
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
249:)
232:)
207:)
190:)
172:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
67:♠
48:.
245:(
228:(
203:(
186:(
168:(
152:)
142:(
140:)
102:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.