219:. Why delete? I think it makes perfect sense to have the criticism section of the science article break into its own article. It was getting to bulky for the main science page anyway. It should be able to break off and expand into its own article- Its a decent enough subject, sources are reliable, their all from the original science article, and im adding more critiqes to the other sections as I type this, so whats the deal? Just because science is a large topic it shouldnt have a criticism page? With that logic why does it have its own article to begin with. (Update) Knowledge has articles dedicated to topics like subgenres of punk music- which a very large topic as well when you dig deep enough, but it broke off from the punk page and became its own article. If wiki can allow that, but not critiques of science, thats a bit of a dissapointment
160:
253:. The nominator has not given a good reason for deletion. This article has forked out of a section that was growing too large. It is sourced. It is a legitimate topic for an article. --
154:
115:
88:
83:
120:
92:
75:
175:
142:
191:
I don't think this belongs as a
Knowledge article. It seems rather silly, taking into account how large of a topic science is.
17:
136:
290:
202:
314:
295:
268:
245:
228:
207:
57:
224:
79:
132:
329:
36:
328:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
182:
241:
220:
71:
63:
310:
168:
148:
53:
237:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
285:
261:
197:
306:
49:
109:
280:
254:
192:
236:. Um, where does 'sillyness' come in on the wiki deletion policy page?
322:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
305:- Article is far from perfect, but the subject is notable. -
48:
The nominator changed his position. Non-admin closure. -
105:
101:
97:
167:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
332:). No further edits should be made to this page.
181:
8:
7:
275:Ok, I see your point. It should be
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
353:
315:03:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
296:03:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
269:02:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
246:02:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
229:02:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
208:02:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
58:04:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
325:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
72:Criticisms of Science
64:Criticisms of Science
344:
327:
293:
288:
283:
266:
259:
221:ProductofSociety
205:
200:
195:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
352:
351:
347:
346:
345:
343:
342:
341:
336:
330:deletion review
323:
291:
286:
281:
262:
255:
203:
198:
193:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
350:
348:
340:
339:
335:
334:
318:
317:
299:
298:
272:
271:
248:
231:
212:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
349:
338:
337:
333:
331:
326:
320:
319:
316:
312:
308:
304:
301:
300:
297:
294:
289:
284:
278:
274:
273:
270:
267:
265:
260:
258:
252:
249:
247:
243:
239:
238:Murderd2death
235:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
214:
213:
210:
209:
206:
201:
196:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
324:
321:
302:
276:
264:(Discussion)
263:
256:
250:
233:
216:
211:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
155:free images
307:RobertMel
50:RobertMel
116:View log
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
133:Google
93:delete
257:Bduke
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
311:talk
303:Keep
277:kept
251:Keep
242:talk
234:Keep
225:talk
217:Keep
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:Keep
282:EMS
279:. —
194:EMS
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
313:)
244:)
227:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
309:(
292:4
287:2
240:(
223:(
204:4
199:2
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.