471:. No independent coverage of what the article is about. Quoting news hits, without discussion of any of the results does not tell us anything. The only results from DreamFocus that are relevent to this article are ones from The Oxford Student, which is not a reliable independent source. If this can be shown to have received significant coverage in reliable sources then I will of course change my vote.
515:
You clearly have a different interpretation of what 'Significant coverage' means. The best source, in 'The
History of the University fo Oxford' (p202), is literally one sentence. The reference you have given from that source on page 214, is just mere mention of the word. The encylopedia of Oxford ref
438:
534:
These sources are not tangential mentions but explain the nature of
Cuppers and give examples of the sports and winners. There are hundreds of other sources which provide yet more information and so the notability guideline is well satisfied.
174:
379:: There is sufficient material in the article to demonstrate its meaning and use, although the introduction could explain the term better (e.g. making it clear between whom the competitions are held).
367:
Relisted since the scope of the article has been expanded would like to see further discussion as this invalidates the initial delete votes and there isn't comment after the changes to justify a keep.
135:
437:
I added in the names of the two colleges in the news search, and while some results are just from the college newspapers, I see others referring to them by this term as well.
417:
168:
17:
622:— the article is well referenced and the term widely used at Oxford and Cambridge. I have added appropriate categories. —
580:
cites references from over a hundred years ago so the nomination's suggestion that this is a neologism is mistaken. See
671:
36:
189:
102:
97:
66:
156:
106:
303:
Not really "fully" I should say. If editors think this content worth preserving a merge is the only way to do it.
384:
670:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
589:
540:
504:
89:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
610:
308:
49:
150:
652:
491:
There are numerous reliable sources for this and I had not the slightest difficulty citing ones such as
440:
Only 200 news results, not 5000, when you make sure to search for "Cuppers" AND "Oxford" OR "Cambridge"
212:
644:
405:
380:
331:
146:
585:
554:
536:
525:
500:
476:
253:
182:
656:
631:
614:
593:
581:
558:
544:
529:
508:
480:
463:
429:
409:
388:
371:
359:
345:
335:
312:
290:
272:
257:
236:
218:
71:
400:- My original vote was cast after my changes, but after the relisting I have to revalidate it.
326:: I've added some actual content to the page, which I think should now justify its notability.
196:
627:
606:
304:
232:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
643:
for "Cuppers" returns 30+ articles by different contributors over the past 18 months. Though
648:
441:
285:
517:
401:
327:
647:
is only a student newspaper, it is arguably a reliable source for slang in this case. -
550:
521:
472:
425:
420:
maybe not the same word, but that means this can simply be expanded to other meanings.
249:
245:
207:
162:
516:
is similarly just mentions of the name. Please explain to me how these sources meet
623:
368:
356:
228:
93:
123:
276:
421:
271:: Actually not a neologism, but the term is described no less fully at
85:
77:
350:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
640:
664:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
639:– this term is both long-established and still in active use:
577:
205:
WP:NEO, does not belong on wikipedia. Perhaps on wiktionary?
130:
119:
115:
111:
181:
355:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
195:
549:One sentence does not significant coverage make.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
674:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
275:, and has no need of its own article. ∙
493:The History of the University of Oxford
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
273:Oxford "-er"#Other Oxonian forms
1:
601:can a hundred year old word
657:15:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
632:14:39, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
615:17:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
594:08:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
559:10:22, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
545:17:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
530:09:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
509:09:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
497:The encyclopaedia of Oxford
481:08:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
464:03:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
430:00:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
410:00:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
389:21:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
372:20:54, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
360:20:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
336:13:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
313:03:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
291:22:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
258:21:36, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
237:20:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
219:20:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
72:05:49, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
691:
667:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
605:still be a neologism?
641:search of Cherwell
584:for more details.
44:The result was
418:5,000 + news hits
362:
682:
669:
460:
457:
454:
451:
448:
445:
354:
352:
348:
288:
282:
217:
215:
210:
200:
199:
185:
133:
127:
109:
63:
34:
690:
689:
685:
684:
683:
681:
680:
679:
678:
672:deletion review
665:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
381:Johnhousefriday
346:
343:
286:
278:
213:
208:
206:
142:
129:
100:
84:
81:
69:
68:Call me MoP! :D
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
688:
686:
677:
676:
660:
659:
634:
624:Jonathan Bowen
617:
596:
586:Colonel Warden
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
537:Colonel Warden
512:
511:
501:Colonel Warden
484:
483:
466:
432:
412:
391:
374:
364:
363:
353:
340:
339:
338:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
296:
295:
294:
293:
239:
203:
202:
139:
80:
75:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
687:
675:
673:
668:
662:
661:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
635:
633:
629:
625:
621:
618:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
572:
571:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
546:
542:
538:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
514:
513:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
470:
467:
465:
462:
461:
439:
436:
433:
431:
427:
423:
419:
416:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:Do Not Delete
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
370:
366:
365:
361:
358:
351:
349:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:Do Not Delete
322:
321:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
292:
289:
284:
283:
281:
274:
270:
267:
264:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
211:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
137:
132:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
74:
73:
70:
64:
61:
57:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
666:
663:
636:
619:
607:Bigdaddy1981
602:
598:
582:Oxford "-er"
573:
496:
492:
468:
442:
434:
414:
397:
393:
376:
344:
323:
305:Bigdaddy1981
279:
277:
268:
265:
262:
241:
224:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
59:
55:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
649:Pointillist
248:neologism.
246:non-notable
169:free images
402:WikiWebbie
328:WikiWebbie
551:Quantpole
522:Quantpole
473:Quantpole
250:Joe Chill
645:Cherwell
347:Relisted
269:Redirect
136:View log
599:Comment
369:Spartaz
357:Spartaz
229:Sigma 7
175:WP refs
163:scholar
103:protect
98:history
86:Cuppers
78:Cuppers
603:really
518:WP:GNG
469:Delete
280:AJCham
263:Delete
242:Delete
147:Google
131:delete
107:delete
62:uppets
54:aster
459:Focus
190:JSTOR
151:books
134:) – (
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
653:talk
637:Keep
628:talk
620:Keep
611:talk
590:talk
576:The
574:Keep
555:talk
541:talk
526:talk
505:talk
495:and
477:talk
435:Keep
426:talk
422:Ikip
415:Keep
406:talk
398:Keep
385:talk
377:Keep
332:talk
309:talk
287:talk
254:talk
244:: A
233:talk
227:. --
225:Prod
214:6403
209:Cabe
183:FENS
157:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
46:keep
578:OED
197:TWL
655:)
630:)
613:)
592:)
557:)
543:)
528:)
520:.
507:)
499:.
479:)
428:)
408:)
387:)
334:)
311:)
266:or
256:)
235:)
177:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
65:-
58:f
48:.
651:(
626:(
609:(
588:(
553:(
539:(
524:(
503:(
475:(
456:m
453:a
450:e
447:r
444:D
424:(
404:(
396:/
383:(
330:(
307:(
252:(
231:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
128:(
126:)
88:(
60:P
56:o
52:M
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.