475:
So, could I make a request that the reasons for deletion be updated and summarized? The article was not split from another article. I think all the synthesis has been removed. It's technical and there is more information than necessary, certainly, but a big part of the technical detail are the features that contrast this engine from others. Thank you for your indulgence.
466:. That last one is illustrative in showing that steam engines are competitive against technologies such as photovoltaics. There is a lot of developed knowledge for this technology, but it is scattered. I think there is an opportunity to collect the scattered knowledge. Then the question is, where to start? Googling
474:
gets 99,200 results. Obviously I think this is an important technology, and, frankly, I feel this particular company has been "hurting the cause", hence the criticisms and synthesis. Please forgive this newbie mistake. I see that material has all been taken out, and I won't be putting it back in.
516:
to me. Excessive technical detail, the sources are an unappealing mixture of press releases, Youtube videos and primary sources... This is either an attempt at promoting, or discrediting, something that doesn't just look very notable. Maybe rewrite by somebody unrelated to the topic in amore
494:
for now. As stated above, I feel the content would be better off trimmed and used as part of an article on the company. However, the content should be retained in some fashion regardless and the original rationale for deletion offered no longer applies. Thus, I say keep, with the strong
345:
I cannot see why the article has to have what is basically an entire treatise on steam engine thermal design, but in any case I cannot find any evidence of real notability. The most promising book reference turned out to be a paranoid work in the
Orwellian vein—self-published, naturally.
428:. Re the original proposal, I don't find any attack elements and we haven't been told which article it would be merged back into. WP:SYNTH is specific to generating unjustifiable conclusions from sources; the accusation has been made here, but I don't see the evidence for it.
194:
I consider this essentially an attack page, devoted to an attack upon the company and their product, but speedy was declined. I note that it is entirely based upon the SYNTHESIS of primary sources. It may appear straight description at first, but keep reading.,
363:- The synthesis and attack elements seem to be mostly gone... I am a bit confused by the "merge back" comments as this does not seem to have been split from anywhere. What is the proposed "main article"?... I'm not sure about the engine, but the company does
408:
The ratio of press release to quality coverage does not matter, only the amount of quality coverage. If say 1/3 of the stories are not press releases, that leaves 5 pages of sources, more than enough to establish notability (for the company).
453:
is a bigger area than is now covered in
Knowledge and is growing in importance. I could dig out a number of examples (and hope to write them up over time), but, for instance, there is a lot of research worldwide on using the waste heat from
163:
445:. I am the original author of the article. DGG - you are right, I read up on it and I did put in synthesis. It looks like that's gone now. If I might make a plea starting with the bigger picture, it goes like this:
385:
223:
on the talk page; as it's a highly technical article, relevant projects should be consulted before running straight to AfD. Knowledge also has this feature that lets you delete things you think are undue.
388:. The information is good but having most of the sources press releases is outstanding. I'm uncertain but I think the company could be notable later with more actual news coverage.
157:
260:
52:. No consensus for a particular action has emerged from this discussion. Note that the notion of a merge can continue to be discussed on the article's talk page, if desired.
384:
because that News search shows a concerning more than half press releases in a 15-page range with reliable and notable sources zig zagging in and out of pages. Books also
243:
277:
116:
89:
84:
297:
The way to deal with the decent material is to add it to the main article, rather than by keeping an unsatisfactory article. It was never a justified split.
93:
76:
367:. Since the remaining content seems OK (albeit probably too detailed), creating an article for the company & merging would be a viable option. --
123:
364:
582:
Certainly a notable topic and there is plenty there that it would be preferred to clean it up and salvage it than to just outright delete it. —
178:
145:
220:
17:
80:
139:
590:
572:
558:
529:
504:
484:
437:
418:
399:
376:
355:
335:
308:
286:
269:
252:
236:
206:
58:
216:
135:
538:
480:
317:
609:
185:
72:
64:
40:
455:
450:
394:
471:
459:
476:
462:
systems, especially at the micro scale, and things like direct solar heat conversion to work such as this
215:- Seems clearly notable to me, possibly it could be merged back to the related article. I tagged it with
605:
282:
265:
248:
54:
36:
151:
467:
500:
414:
389:
372:
171:
568:
554:
433:
331:
585:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
604:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
351:
225:
520:
496:
410:
368:
564:
550:
429:
327:
304:
202:
110:
347:
463:
446:
541:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
320:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
299:
197:
598:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
106:
102:
98:
170:
563:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
326:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
261:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
612:). No further edits should be made to this page.
512:This is the sort of article that looks just ...
456:automobiles and commercial vehicles (EU project)
244:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
184:
8:
278:list of Science-related deletion discussions
276:Note: This debate has been included in the
259:Note: This debate has been included in the
242:Note: This debate has been included in the
275:
258:
241:
7:
583:
517:condensed and comprehensible form?
24:
495:possibility of a later merger. --
221:Knowledge:WikiProject Automobiles
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
470:gets 3,580,000 results while
217:Knowledge:WikiProject Energy
464:Solar Steam Irrigation Pump
629:
549:No consensus reached yet.
485:23:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
438:17:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
419:14:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
400:19:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
377:21:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
356:20:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
336:07:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
309:05:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
287:02:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
270:02:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
253:02:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
237:01:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
207:00:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
472:Cyclone waste heat engine
73:Cyclone Waste Heat Engine
65:Cyclone Waste Heat Engine
601:Please do not modify it.
591:17:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
451:waste heat recovery unit
59:01:37, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
573:21:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
559:21:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
530:12:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
505:17:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
460:combined heat and power
382:Probably delete for now
365:appear to be notable
547:Relisting comment:
386:found a few things
575:
528:
468:waste heat engine
458:, application to
338:
289:
272:
255:
620:
603:
589:
562:
544:
542:
527:
525:
518:
477:BuddyWhazhizname
397:
392:
325:
323:
321:
285:
268:
251:
233:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
57:
34:
628:
627:
623:
622:
621:
619:
618:
617:
616:
610:deletion review
599:
576:
537:
535:
521:
519:
395:
390:
339:
316:
314:
281:
264:
247:
226:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
626:
624:
615:
614:
594:
593:
561:
545:
534:
533:
532:
507:
488:
487:
440:
423:
422:
421:
403:
402:
391:SwisterTwister
379:
358:
324:
313:
312:
311:
291:
290:
273:
256:
239:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
625:
613:
611:
607:
602:
596:
595:
592:
587:
581:
578:
577:
574:
570:
566:
560:
556:
552:
548:
543:
540:
531:
526:
524:
515:
511:
508:
506:
502:
498:
493:
490:
489:
486:
482:
478:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
452:
448:
444:
441:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
420:
416:
412:
407:
406:
405:
404:
401:
398:
393:
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
357:
353:
349:
344:
341:
340:
337:
333:
329:
322:
319:
310:
306:
302:
301:
296:
293:
292:
288:
284:
283:North America
279:
274:
271:
267:
266:North America
262:
257:
254:
250:
249:North America
245:
240:
238:
234:
232:
231:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
199:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
56:
55:North America
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
600:
597:
586:Technical 13
579:
546:
536:
522:
513:
509:
491:
442:
425:
381:
360:
342:
315:
298:
294:
229:
228:
212:
196:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
158:free images
523:Sandstein
447:Waste heat
606:talk page
497:ThaddeusB
411:ThaddeusB
369:ThaddeusB
37:talk page
608:or in a
565:Mr. Guye
551:Mr. Guye
539:Relisted
430:Spicemix
328:Davewild
318:Relisted
230:Мандичка
117:View log
39:or in a
510:Delete.
443:Abstain
361:Comment
295:Comment
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
348:Mangoe
343:delete
136:Google
94:delete
305:talk
203:talk
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
584:{{U|
580:Keep
569:talk
555:talk
501:talk
492:Keep
481:talk
449:and
434:talk
426:Keep
415:talk
396:talk
373:talk
352:talk
332:talk
219:and
213:Keep
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
588:}}
514:off
300:DGG
235:😜
198:DGG
186:TWL
115:– (
571:)
557:)
503:)
483:)
436:)
417:)
409:--
375:)
354:)
334:)
307:)
280:.
263:.
246:.
205:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
567:(
553:(
499:(
479:(
432:(
413:(
371:(
350:(
330:(
303:(
227:—
201:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.