560:- Sufficiently non-commercial in tone. Doubtlessly up a bit sooner than an article on this topic should have been, but I'd advocate use of the rule of reason here: "Is Knowledge better served by the inclusion or deletion of this article?" The piece as it stands has some early sourcing going and may be of use to WP users; it's deletion would not advance the encyclopedia project, in my estimation.
442:, which does not apply to this game because it is not a person, individual animal, organization, or Web content. Knowledge's notability rules are sufficiently fascist and privileging of the viewpoint of soulless organizations that exist to make people like Rupert Murdoch richer without arrogating additional, consensus-not-in-evidence criteria about whether the sources say the topic is
298:
296:
for a week or so, given the relative novelty of this game, it's entirely possible that it WILL be notable (through mutliple, in-depth RS reviews) within the next week or several in-depth reviews. That is, if it's not already notable via what
415:
i.e. what sets it apart from all the other games out there. By the standards set out above, every commercially published video game would be notable as press releases and blog reviews can be found covering it.
410:
also requires "more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic to constitute significant coverage." Notability need to be long term. The article also needs to show how this particular game is
158:
434:
defines that as about independent reliable source coverage. Your claim that the article needs to assert notability is specifically false; "assertion of notability" is not a part of
119:
301:
has been able to find on it so far. At any rate, it's not clear to me why this article was immediately tagged for deletion, rather than sourcing and notability.
221:
152:
272:
209:
403:
462:
Yes, gamershell is a reliable source. No, a press release isn't independent coverage. Co-Optimus needs vetting for reliability. However, how about
318:- It seems lately that review sites have been slower about catching up on reviews, seems a bit early to nomination for deletion. --
17:
239:
402:
don't seems to know what notability is. Most of the sources are simply redacted versions of the release announcement.
49:
173:
584:
140:
36:
583:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
92:
87:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
535:- the Co-Optimus source is unlikely to pass, but the other two sources are reliable. Combined with the small
536:
467:
227:
215:
96:
463:
520:
475:
364:
So far all of the sources provided simply prove that the game exists. None of them show any notability.
79:
134:
421:
369:
194:
489:
451:
387:
352:
339:
and one that looks actually better than the first to me, and which I've proposed to be included at
166:
306:
130:
335:. With a little research I turned up two references, one from a source considered reliable at
569:
565:
552:
548:
524:
493:
479:
455:
425:
391:
373:
356:
327:
323:
310:
287:
283:
261:
257:
198:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
540:
516:
507:
471:
180:
417:
365:
340:
336:
190:
57:
430:
On
Knowledge, all "notability" really means is "should we have an article on this?", and
485:
447:
383:
348:
189:
5 day old newly released computer game without any assertion of particular notability.
431:
344:
302:
382:" means. Coverage in independent reliable sources is what demonstrates notability.
561:
544:
439:
319:
279:
253:
233:
146:
113:
435:
407:
379:
53:
510:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
83:
577:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
75:
67:
470:. I need to see one more piece of coverage - search continues.
466:'s interview with Mark Currie of BlueGiant? Trivial piece at
246:
109:
105:
101:
543:
I'd say this is Stub or Start-worthy for inclusion. --
165:
406:
comes closer to a review but is still rather short.
347:-satisfying coverage, I'm pretty sure it's notable.
515:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
398:I don't really want to get into an argument, but
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
587:). No further edits should be made to this page.
210:list of video game related deletion discussions
343:. With it already having attracted arguably
179:
8:
484:That RPS interview is just lovely; thanks!
273:list of Games-related deletion discussions
267:
271:: This debate has been included in the
238:
208:: This debate has been included in the
378:You don't appear to understand what "
7:
244:
24:
232:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
570:03:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
226:
62:21:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
553:18:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
525:01:20, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
494:00:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
480:17:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
456:21:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
426:15:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
392:15:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
374:09:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
357:02:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
328:17:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
311:15:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
288:15:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262:15:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
220:
199:08:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
214:
604:
580:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
438:, it's a matter of
464:Rock Paper Shotgun
44:The result was
527:
290:
276:
264:
50:non-admin closure
595:
582:
514:
512:
277:
251:
250:
249:
242:
236:
230:
224:
218:
204:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
34:
603:
602:
598:
597:
596:
594:
593:
592:
591:
585:deletion review
578:
505:
316:Seconding Defer
245:
213:
126:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
601:
599:
590:
589:
573:
572:
555:
537:indiegames.com
529:
528:
513:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
468:indiegames.com
460:
459:
458:
396:
395:
394:
330:
313:
291:
265:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
600:
588:
586:
581:
575:
574:
571:
567:
563:
559:
556:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
531:
530:
526:
522:
518:
511:
509:
504:
503:
495:
491:
487:
483:
482:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
414:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
292:
289:
285:
281:
274:
270:
266:
263:
259:
255:
248:
241:
235:
229:
223:
217:
211:
207:
203:
202:
201:
200:
196:
192:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
579:
576:
557:
532:
506:
443:
412:
399:
361:
332:
315:
293:
268:
205:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
541:Marasmusine
517:Ron Ritzman
472:Marasmusine
299:Google News
153:free images
486:—chaos5023
448:—chaos5023
418:Travelbird
384:—chaos5023
380:notability
366:Travelbird
349:—chaos5023
191:Travelbird
539:found by
533:Weak Keep
444:important
280:• Gene93k
254:• Gene93k
508:Relisted
341:WP:VG/RS
337:WP:VG/RS
303:Jclemens
120:View log
562:Carrite
545:Teancum
413:notable
362:Comment
320:Teancum
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
440:CSD A7
432:WP:GNG
345:WP:GNG
131:Google
97:delete
294:Defer
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
54:Atmoz
16:<
566:talk
558:Keep
549:talk
521:talk
490:talk
476:talk
452:talk
436:WP:N
422:talk
408:WP:N
404:this
388:talk
370:talk
353:talk
333:Keep
324:talk
307:talk
284:talk
269:Note
258:talk
247:Talk
206:Note
195:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
76:APOX
68:APOX
58:talk
46:keep
400:you
278:--
212:. (
181:TWL
118:– (
48:. (
568:)
551:)
523:)
492:)
478:)
454:)
446:.
424:)
390:)
372:)
355:)
326:)
309:)
286:)
275:.
260:)
252:)
240:RS
197:)
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
564:(
547:(
519:(
488:(
474:(
450:(
420:(
386:(
368:(
351:(
322:(
305:(
282:(
256:(
243:·
237:·
234:S
231:·
228:B
225:·
222:N
219:·
216:G
193:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.