250:
and well written. The author is among the most notable academics and scientists, and that generates the initial outgoing and incoming links for this article It is unclear (with no references) why you call it a polemic - implies you have read it? – That's perhaps opinion, in mine it isn't. But that's beside the point. It is, as one might expect from the author, well argued, and footnoted. It argues a case which has caught many readers and reviewer's attention (as evidenced by articles in leading social science journals), and has garnered significant attention, both positive and negative: That's my definition of notable.
103:
98:
107:
90:
267:
It appears the reviews in the
National Review and Commentary Magazine are completely legit and in and of themselves are enough to establish notability. I see nothing in the New York times citation on the book, rather just a passing mention of the author. The PDF appears to be an academic paper and
249:
Perhaps not every book (or every anything) reviewed at
Publisher's weekly is notable. But this book has been reviewed not just with a press release, but in the leading journals and magazines relevant to its topic - all I see have their own wiki pages. The reviews are in depth article-length essays,
177:
94:
86:
78:
171:
137:
323:
302:
277:
259:
240:
72:
192:
159:
153:
149:
199:
268:
as such a primary source, not really acceptable for notability. But the two reviews should be enough to satisfy notability as they are in national publications of wide circulation.
130:
165:
311:
17:
53:
341:
40:
66:
337:
286:
36:
235:
223:
298:
255:
185:
273:
61:
319:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
336:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
290:
229:
217:
87:
America-Lite: How
Imperial Academia Dismantled Our Culture (and Ushered in the Obamacrats)
79:
America-Lite: How
Imperial Academia Dismantled Our Culture (and Ushered in the Obamacrats)
294:
251:
269:
315:
124:
330:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
116:
112:
184:
293:
are more than sufficient to establish notability. --
208:
Non-notable new polemic; not every book reviewed in
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
344:). No further edits should be made to this page.
312:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
198:
8:
310:Note: This debate has been included in the
309:
7:
24:
216:is thereby rendered notable. --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
228:00:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
58:
1:
324:16:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
303:14:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
278:04:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
260:00:45, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
241:00:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
73:00:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
361:
333:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
326:
214:Publishers Weekly
54:non-admin closure
352:
335:
238:
232:
226:
220:
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
69:
64:
60:
34:
360:
359:
355:
354:
353:
351:
350:
349:
348:
342:deletion review
331:
291:National Review
236:
230:
224:
218:
210:National Review
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
358:
356:
347:
346:
327:
306:
305:
280:
262:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
357:
345:
343:
339:
334:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
308:
307:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
281:
279:
275:
271:
266:
263:
261:
257:
253:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
233:
227:
221:
215:
211:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
70:
65:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
332:
329:
282:
264:
246:
213:
209:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
285:Reviews in
231:Orange Mike
219:Orange Mike
172:free images
59:-- Cheers,
287:Commentary
338:talk page
316:• Gene93k
295:DThomsen8
252:Tim bates
37:talk page
340:or in a
270:Gtwfan52
131:View log
39:or in a
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
68:Huntley
150:Google
108:delete
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
63:Riley
16:<
320:talk
299:talk
289:and
283:Keep
274:talk
265:Keep
256:talk
247:Keep
237:Talk
225:Talk
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
50:keep
212:or
200:TWL
129:– (
52:. (
322:)
314:.
301:)
276:)
258:)
234:|
222:|
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
56:)
318:(
297:(
272:(
254:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.