280:- the akc lets dogs of any breed participate, even mutts and unrecognized breeds, as the point is that "canine good citizens" have a certain amount of basic obedience training that makes them safe around kids. The breeds listed are whatever the owner put on the paperwork when they entered the testing. "All dogs, including both purebred and mixed breed dogs are welcome to participate in the AKC’s Canine Good Citizen (CGC) Program."
214:
The last nomination of this article was closed as no consensus-no prejudice to renomination, nearly six months ago. I did not renominate it immediately in the hope that sources would materialize in that time, but no such luck - there are still no sources. 99% of the hits for "American
Mastiff" turn
388:
250:
312:, the publishing info and ISBN are in the article and Worldcat shows its at a number of libraries. Is one WP:RS entry enough? There are certainly web-based sources but I have no idea how independent any of them are, e.g., Dog Breed Info Center
223:
who happen to be
American - for example, the 'American Mastiff Club' that appears in numerous Google books results has nothing to do with this breed; it is a club for american owners of English Mastiffs. This breed just flat-out isn't notable.
183:
82:
177:
467:
Just wanted to point out that the issue for deletion isn't whether its a breed or cross breed, as notable cross breeds can also be the subjects of articles, see, e.g.,
412:
136:
77:
253:
143:
330:
308:
Thanks for the dog show info and I agree that if the breed info was self-reported the news article doesn't prove much. The book reference is clearly
283:
As such, I wouldn't really say that the newspaper is too terribly reliable. I can't speak to Planet Dog at all, I don't know anything about it. --
109:
104:
472:
395:
334:
316:
256:
113:
505:
480:
458:
424:
403:
369:
342:
324:
299:
264:
240:
96:
61:
198:
17:
165:
252:
and this newspaper reference that would appear to indicate that one of the breed was shown in the 2007 Charleston Dog Show
215:
up breeder sites, self-published material, obviously unreliable sources, mirrors of this page, and information on
159:
526:
40:
353:
actually removes DBI if we find it in articles; it's a weird hybrid of seo scrape and user-submitted content. --
155:
498:
476:
451:
399:
338:
329:
On the specific question of Dog Breed Info Center I raised, this RfC pretty clearly came down as not WP:RS.
320:
260:
100:
216:
522:
315:. I wouldn't rely on them unless we've demonstrated their reliability somewhere else in breed articles.
205:
57:
36:
92:
67:
441:(or dare I suggest a very small handful of enterprising breeders using it to promote a cross breed?).
191:
490:
443:
420:
277:
171:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
521:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
367:
297:
238:
53:
387:
I gave it my best shot but I don't think that the one WP:RS reference I could come up with
436:
331:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dogs/Archive_7#RfC:_Dog_Breed_Info_--_reliable_source_or_not.3F
220:
276:: Just so you know, as far as the dog show, it was a canine good citizenship test, not a
489:
as both a breed in its own right and as a cross/"designer" breed, so should be deleted.
486:
391:
350:
416:
309:
281:
313:
130:
468:
355:
285:
226:
471:. American mastiffs just don't meet our notability standards in either case.
485:
Yes, 24.151...., what I was meaning is that IMO it completely fails
515:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
394:. If anyone else finds more before this closes, I'd revisit.
126:
122:
118:
83:
Articles for deletion/American
Mastiff (2nd nomination)
190:
249:
The best new references I could find were this book
435:- insufficient refs to prove this is anything but
255:. My personal opinion is that this is borderline.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
529:). No further edits should be made to this page.
413:list of Organisms-related deletion discussions
204:
8:
411:Note: This debate has been included in the
410:
390:is enough significant coverage to satisfy
75:
78:Articles for deletion/American Mastiff
7:
74:
24:
439:that happen to live in America
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
546:
481:16:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
459:12:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
425:01:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
404:19:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
370:19:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
343:19:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
325:18:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
300:18:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
265:16:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
241:15:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
518:Please do not modify it.
506:08:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
62:21:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
217:American Mastiff bats
349:You beat me to it.
48:The result was
442:
427:
278:conformation show
537:
520:
503:
495:
494:
456:
448:
447:
440:
437:English Mastiffs
364:
361:
358:
294:
291:
288:
235:
232:
229:
221:English Mastiffs
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
93:American Mastiff
68:American Mastiff
34:
545:
544:
540:
539:
538:
536:
535:
534:
533:
527:deletion review
516:
499:
492:
491:
452:
445:
444:
362:
359:
356:
292:
289:
286:
233:
230:
227:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
543:
541:
532:
531:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
462:
461:
429:
428:
407:
406:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
327:
303:
302:
268:
267:
212:
211:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
542:
530:
528:
524:
519:
513:
507:
504:
502:
496:
493:SagaciousPhil
488:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
473:24.151.116.25
470:
466:
465:
464:
463:
460:
457:
455:
449:
446:SagaciousPhil
438:
434:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
409:
408:
405:
401:
397:
396:24.151.116.25
393:
389:
386:
383:
382:
371:
368:
366:
365:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
335:24.151.116.25
332:
328:
326:
322:
318:
317:24.151.116.25
314:
311:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
298:
296:
295:
282:
279:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
257:24.151.116.25
254:
251:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
237:
236:
222:
218:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
517:
514:
500:
453:
432:
384:
354:
284:
273:
246:
225:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
469:Labradoodle
178:free images
54:Mark Arsten
523:talk page
417:• Gene93k
37:talk page
525:or in a
137:View log
39:or in a
274:Comment
247:Comment
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
487:WP:GNG
433:Delete
392:WP:GNG
385:Delete
351:WP:DOG
156:Google
114:delete
50:delete
310:WP:RS
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
501:Chat
477:talk
454:Chat
421:talk
400:talk
339:talk
321:talk
261:talk
219:and
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
206:TWL
135:– (
497:-
479:)
450:-
423:)
415:.
402:)
341:)
333:.
323:)
263:)
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
52:.
475:(
419:(
398:(
363:K
360:K
357:T
337:(
319:(
293:K
290:K
287:T
259:(
234:K
231:K
228:T
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.