448:. First of all, since the article refutes the fallacy that "It is bad because Hitler did it too" or "Hitler promoted X, therefore it is bad". The fact that we have such an article helps a neutral image. But anyways, this article doesn't seem notable to me, because we do not have any examples. If we can find examples, then the article can stay for certain, because if we are able to find examples, the article is notable. I say we should allow time for examples to be found before we destroy it. --
543:"Propaganda is a form of communication aimed towards influencing the attitude of the community toward some cause or position". Due to the facts of what the nazis and Hitler did, ant-nazi and anti-Hitler propaganda likely played little or no role influencing attitudes towards nazis or Hitler and thus it lacks notability.
519:
article gets deleted, in the belief it's not relevant, or that Anti-Hitler
Propaganda doesn't exist, I will, with certainly, leave, because that would prove that this encyclopedia is not neutral. I could add much more details to the article, but then I want to be assured it's not going to be deleted.
322:
Nazi's are a touchy subject. It is mentioned above that "Anti-Nazi propaganda" appears mainly in pro-Nazi articles, which makes sense; it's hard to find someone neutral who would defend Nazi's, even against a false accusation. If I walked into a crowded room, and yelled out "Nazi's hate puppies!" no
538:
If you have reliable sources that go into depth about this topic and thereby establish notability, then do add them. This is an encyclopedia. Articles must by notable and neutral and the article does not meet these criteria yet. Consider that there may be good reason why "anti-nazi propaganda" is
647:
Since there is an article for Nazi
Propaganda, I'd say it should be kept. Besides, like I said in another comment, I think it's very notable to all serious historians, but no one really takes it any further in the fear of being labeled as a pro-Nazi or Nazi symphatizer. I'm sorry, but you simply
350:. If there were some substantive content in the article, as to propaganda that was issued by people who knew it to be false, I might take a diffenret view, but at present we have no more than a dictionary definition with two citations, one of which is to a book that has no proper citation.
208:
If we assume good faith, the two sources at best only mention these phrases. I conducted Google searches and it appears that "Anti-Nazi propaganda" and "Anti-Hitler propaganda" are phrases used by pro-Nazi (which I won't linked to here but you can search and see what I mean) and anti-Jewish
605:
Although the term probably exists, the article provides no references to reliable sources that discuss it, making the article a dictionary definition at most. Also, the (original research?) content seems to be, incredibly enough, an inept attempt at Nazi apologism.
313:
Of course the article is a stub, but just the fact its being considered for deletion really makes me question
Knowledge (XXG)'s neutrality. If Knowledge (XXG) doesn't recognize the article, then I certainly wont be a part of this anymore. - Jonas
284:
Appears to be presenting the twisted mindset of Nazi apologists as fact ("Anti-Nazi propaganda is openly and commonly used in popular Adolf Hitler and World War II documentaries" - !), and no sensible definition of this term seems likely.
585:
Also, I think Anti-Nazi propaganda is very notable, but nobody talks about it in the fear of being labeled as a pro-Nazi. Personally, I'd say it could boost
Knowledge (XXG)'s neutrality image, that this article is kept.
514:
what I think is very rude, and non-neutral. I agree that you can't judge an entire page because of "some" certain users behavior. I had a pretty bad day, and perhaps I exaggerated. Yet, I stand firm in my belief that if
177:
563:
I could certainly do that, but it would seem like such a waste if it were to be deleted. If we can conclude that the article deserves to be an article and not deleted, I can add tons of information and sources.
388:
is against
Knowledge (XXG) policy, and does not stop the deletion process; it only makes it more difficult for other users to comment on the discussion. Furthermore, calling other users "a big idiot!" is not
323:
one would come to their defense, especially with the risk of being labeled as "pro-nazi." Proving notability for this article will be difficult: neutral, verifiable sources will be near impossible to find.
469:
People, also remember that we can display content without promoting and endorsing anyone's opinion's or arguments. In other words, just because we reveal other's opinions doesn't mean we agree with them.
486:
You indicated "keep" even though you concluded that the article is not notable? We don't keep article on
Knowledge (XXG) based on the hope that they will someday become notable.
171:
130:
241:
261:
424:
I've had enough. I'm not going to be part of this completely non-neutral encyclopedia, who's also heavily influenced by propaganda. Do whatever you want, I'm leaving.
137:
103:
98:
107:
90:
369:
I cant seriously believe this conversation/discussion is actually happening. If you don't regonise Anti-Nazi propaganda exist, you are
52:. The two keep votes didn't craft an argument strong enough to turn the scales to their side against what most delete votes expressed.
17:
192:
159:
380:. The issue is whether or not it is notable, not whether or not it exists. Also, removing the deletion template as you did
680:
40:
153:
510:
I actually do have dozens of examples, but before I could continue the stub article, it was nominated for deletion.
661:
637:
618:
595:
573:
552:
548:
529:
495:
491:
479:
457:
433:
412:
359:
334:
308:
294:
273:
253:
232:
218:
214:
72:
149:
94:
657:
591:
569:
525:
429:
355:
303:
199:
86:
78:
676:
544:
487:
210:
36:
393:, please don't do it. Lastly, I would appreciate it if you sign your posts with four tildes like so:
445:
269:
249:
228:
185:
398:
165:
653:
587:
565:
521:
475:
453:
441:
425:
351:
390:
407:
329:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
675:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
444:
Hold on. You can't judge all of
Knowledge (XXG) by these few editors. We have a page called
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
633:
290:
65:
377:
265:
245:
227:
a random nominal phrase. not a subject of significant discourse in literature.- Altenmann
609:
507:
471:
449:
402:
347:
324:
124:
629:
286:
58:
540:
302:, doesn't appear to be covered in sufficient depth to support an article. --
628:
Appears to be a non-notable example of the phrase "anti-X propaganda".
209:
websites. Notability and NPOV are the main reasons for deletion.
669:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
652:
deny the existence of Anti-Nazi/Anti-Hitler propaganda.
385:
381:
373:
a neutral
Wikipedian, and a big idiot! - Jonas Vinther
120:
116:
112:
184:
198:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
683:). No further edits should be made to this page.
242:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
262:list of History-related deletion discussions
260:Note: This debate has been included in the
240:Note: This debate has been included in the
259:
239:
376:In regards to this comment, please see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
539:not notable. Quoting from
700:
619:20:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
596:22:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
574:22:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
553:17:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
530:22:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
496:05:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
480:23:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
458:23:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
434:22:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
413:21:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
360:17:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
335:17:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
309:11:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
295:11:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
274:10:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
254:10:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
233:07:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
219:01:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
662:22:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
638:20:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
73:02:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
672:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
446:Reductio ad Hitlerum
305:SarekOfVulcan (talk)
87:Anti-Nazi Propaganda
79:Anti-Nazi Propaganda
442:User:Jonas Vinther
48:The result was
617:
276:
256:
56:
691:
674:
616:
614:
607:
545:I am One of Many
488:I am One of Many
410:
405:
396:
332:
327:
306:
211:I am One of Many
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
70:
63:
54:
34:
699:
698:
694:
693:
692:
690:
689:
688:
687:
681:deletion review
670:
610:
608:
408:
403:
394:
330:
325:
304:
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
66:
59:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
697:
695:
686:
685:
665:
664:
641:
640:
622:
621:
599:
598:
579:
578:
577:
576:
558:
557:
556:
555:
533:
532:
501:
500:
499:
498:
483:
482:
461:
460:
436:
418:
417:
416:
415:
363:
362:
337:
317:
316:
315:
297:
278:
277:
257:
236:
235:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
696:
684:
682:
678:
673:
667:
666:
663:
659:
655:
654:Jonas Vinther
651:
646:
643:
642:
639:
635:
631:
627:
624:
623:
620:
615:
613:
604:
601:
600:
597:
593:
589:
588:Jonas Vinther
584:
581:
580:
575:
571:
567:
566:Jonas Vinther
562:
561:
560:
559:
554:
550:
546:
542:
537:
536:
535:
534:
531:
527:
523:
522:Jonas Vinther
518:
513:
509:
506:
503:
502:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
481:
477:
473:
468:
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
440:
437:
435:
431:
427:
426:Jonas Vinther
423:
420:
419:
414:
411:
406:
400:
392:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
372:
371:certainly not
368:
365:
364:
361:
357:
353:
352:Peterkingiron
349:
345:
341:
338:
336:
333:
328:
321:
318:
312:
311:
310:
307:
301:
298:
296:
292:
288:
283:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
238:
237:
234:
231:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
69:
64:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
671:
668:
649:
644:
625:
611:
602:
582:
516:
511:
504:
466:
438:
421:
370:
366:
348:Adolf Hitler
343:
339:
319:
299:
281:
224:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
67:
60:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
172:free images
612:Sandstein
541:propaganda
266:Necrothesp
246:Necrothesp
677:talk page
399:WP:SIGHOW
55:→ Call me
37:talk page
679:or in a
508:Mr. Guye
472:Mr. Guye
450:Mr. Guye
344:Redirect
131:View log
39:or in a
603:Delete.
583:Comment
505:Comment
467:Comment
422:Comment
367:Comment
320:Comment
314:Vinther
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
650:cannot
626:Delete
512:That's
404:Greedo
397:. See
378:WP:ENN
340:Delete
326:Greedo
300:Delete
287:Nick-D
282:Delete
225:Delete
150:Google
108:delete
50:delete
391:civil
229:: -->
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
658:talk
645:Keep
634:talk
592:talk
570:talk
549:talk
526:talk
517:this
492:talk
476:talk
454:talk
439:Keep
430:talk
395:~~~~
386:here
384:and
382:here
356:talk
291:talk
270:talk
250:talk
215:talk
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
61:Hahc
630:Sjö
346:to
342:or
200:TWL
129:– (
660:)
636:)
594:)
572:)
551:)
528:)
494:)
478:)
470:--
456:)
432:)
401:.
358:)
293:)
272:)
264:.
252:)
244:.
217:)
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
68:21
656:(
632:(
590:(
568:(
547:(
524:(
490:(
474:(
452:(
428:(
409:8
354:(
331:8
289:(
268:(
248:(
230:t
213:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.