194:"I'm surprised — I thought his name was reasonably well known — but I have to agree with Edison that there is still no reliable sourcing listed, even after the AfD has run this long, and that therefore he fails WP:BIO. To break the footnotes in the current version down in more detail: #1 gives a little biographical detail but seems self-published and unreliable (a biz website associated with Schlafly). #2 mentions him only trivially. #3 is unreliable (a tripod website) and mentions him only trivially. #4 and #5 provide opposite sides of the same story but neither is reliable and both mention him only as one of several participants in the abortion-breast cancer faux controversy rather than providing any biographic detail. #6 is Schlafly himself expressing an opinion. #7 is a bio of his mother, and notability is not inherited. #8 is a paper published by him. #9 is a bio on the web site of an organization founded by his mother. #10 is a marriage bann, certainly not evidence of notability. #11 and #12 source only the fact that he ran a losing political campaign, and WP:POLITICIAN makes clear that that does not suffice for notability. #13 is his mother's organization again. #14 is not so much about him as about Conservapedia (which I agree is notable, much as I may not like that fact). #15 is about a scientific discovery that is per se unrelated to the subject, #16 is his own web site about the discovery, and #17–19 are blog posts about his stupid reaction to the discovery. If that's the best we can come up with, I don't think it's good enough."
175:
The basic rational for deleting is that the subject does not have enough reliable sources to create a neutral, and verifiable article that fits the basic standard outlined in biographies of living persons. The sources used in the article are either trivial, include only trivial mention of the
201:
All of the issues of verifiability and notability are still present, there has been no substantial movement towards addressing any of the issues, expanding the article or dealing with neutrality issues. My recommendation is that this be deleted and setup as a redirect to
171:
resulted in no consensus. I am bringing it back up because I feel that the arguments made to keep the article are invalid and all of the substantial problems that lead to an unanimous delete and redirect are still present.
168:
164:
95:
90:
85:
80:
48:. The last debate closed on July 18 as a default keep. This is way too soon to be relisting. Take it to DRV or the talk page if you think the last closure was invalid. Non-admin closure.
255:
156:
75:
167:
that pointed out its lack of verifiability and notability. The article was resurrected and failed a speedy delete because it was not the exact same article. However the
183:, or from his mother. His article must stand or fall based on sources available for him. I would like to call particular attention to an analysis of sources given by
224:
surely. Whatever us terrible liberals at
Knowledge (XXG) may think, Conservapedia exists and is notable. I think that he does acquire notability from the
123:
118:
127:
17:
287:
271:
245:
215:
58:
110:
241:
302:
36:
301:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
267:
211:
114:
184:
49:
237:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
263:
258:
this is an invalid argument, Conservapedia is notable, no one is denying that but he does
207:
106:
64:
163:
This article was originally deleted and redirected to conservapedia after an unanimous
233:
203:
180:
283:
144:
229:
295:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151:
140:
136:
132:
262:
gain notability for an article because he founded it.
96:
Articles for deletion/Andrew
Schlafly (5th nomination)
91:
Articles for deletion/Andrew
Schlafly (4th nomination)
86:
Articles for deletion/Andrew
Schlafly (3rd nomination)
81:
Articles for deletion/Andrew
Schlafly (2nd nomination)
232:
get his notability - do we question his bio here? —
179:Andrew Schlafly does not inherit notability from
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
305:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
228:of founding Conservapedia. From whence does
176:subject, or are related to conservapedia.
73:
76:Articles for deletion/Andrew Schlafly
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
71:
24:
187:in the last AFD to quote him:
1:
256:Notability is not inherited
322:
288:19:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
272:19:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
246:19:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
216:19:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
59:19:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
298:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
70:AfDs for this article:
185:User:David Eppstein
44:The result was
281:way way too soon
169:AFD that followed
56:
313:
300:
154:
148:
130:
54:
52:
51:Ten Pound Hammer
34:
321:
320:
316:
315:
314:
312:
311:
310:
309:
303:deletion review
296:
150:
121:
107:Andrew Schlafly
105:
102:
100:
68:
65:Andrew Schlafly
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
319:
317:
308:
307:
291:
290:
275:
274:
249:
248:
199:
198:
197:
196:
161:
160:
101:
99:
98:
93:
88:
83:
78:
72:
69:
67:
62:
55:and his otters
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
318:
306:
304:
299:
293:
292:
289:
286:
285:
280:
277:
276:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:conservapedia
195:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
186:
182:
181:Conservapedia
177:
173:
170:
166:
158:
153:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
82:
79:
77:
74:
66:
63:
61:
60:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
297:
294:
282:
278:
259:
252:
225:
221:
200:
193:
178:
174:
162:
45:
43:
31:
28:
279:Speedy keep
230:Jimmy Wales
46:Speedy keep
264:Tmtoulouse
208:Tmtoulouse
242:contribs
234:RHaworth
157:View log
284:Sceptre
253:Comment
124:protect
119:history
152:delete
128:delete
155:) – (
145:views
137:watch
133:links
16:<
268:talk
238:Talk
222:Keep
212:talk
141:logs
115:talk
111:edit
260:not
226:act
165:afd
57:•
270:)
244:)
240:|
214:)
206:.
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
266:(
236:(
210:(
159:)
149:(
147:)
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.