420:. Despite Bearian's brash comment above, we are not dealing with a hoax here. The source cited in the article (the paper of Zel'dovich and Novikov) is not independent because Novikov was a co-aothor of the paper of Doroshkevich being discussed there, but the story itself is both well-known and is well-documented by multiple reliable sources completely independent from Doroshkevish and Novikov, and from Zel'dovich's Moscow school in general. There are quite a few western books, e.g. here
440:, that recount the history of the Doroshkevish-Novikov paper, and explain the context of its relation to the work of Penzais and Wilson, in substantial detail. The above references are just a small sample of what's available on this topic in the literature. However, as far as notability of Doroshkevish is concerned, we may still be dealing with a
540:. It has impeccable credentials both for its (famous western physicist) editors and publisher and confirms that this story is no hoax. Doroshkevich and Novikov did indeed discover the background radiation (after Shmaonov did even earlier but was forgotten), prior to Penzias and Wilson.
302:. Given how often the subject is mentioned in contemporary English-language language sources, it's highly likely that additional coverage is available offline and / or in Russian, also taking into account that his career took place in the pre-internet era.
426:
423:
421:
438:
429:
435:
432:
299:
166:
218:
160:
119:
238:
258:
319:
as the important parts here are actually WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF and none of them are convinced since there's simply nothing significant, therefore delete.
461:
92:
87:
126:
96:
79:
181:
148:
17:
561:-- switching back to keep as the article has been expanded with new sources added. It's an acceptable stub at this point.
544:
that I didn't use (because
Doroshkevich was one of the authors) also mentions rumors of another prediscovery in Japan. —
358:
298:
Pls see below: Original comment: I believe the subject passes GNG, despite (possibly) low citation count. Here's the
142:
505:
587:
570:
553:
526:
496:
473:
453:
411:
394:
374:
337:
311:
290:
270:
250:
230:
210:
61:
606:
40:
138:
549:
492:
332:
201:
83:
188:
537:
362:
602:
566:
407:
307:
266:
246:
226:
36:
286:
57:
545:
488:
320:
174:
75:
67:
154:
390:
370:
350:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
601:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
562:
541:
403:
303:
262:
242:
222:
583:
469:
449:
441:
282:
53:
517:
484:
346:
386:
382:
366:
354:
402:
Delete on second thoughts. Could be recreated in the future if anyone is willing.
113:
460:
Note that he is usually cited as "A.G. Doroshkevish", and a GScholar search for
579:
465:
445:
365:
for their work. I've met
Penzias, and professor, you're no Penzias.
595:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
536:. I found another source on the French Knowledge article and
508:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
219:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
578:, in view of the newly improved state of the article.
173:
464:
gives an h-index of about 34, which is pretty high.
514:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
609:). No further edits should be made to this page.
385:, who had done theoretical work in that field.
239:list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
257:Note: This debate has been included in the
237:Note: This debate has been included in the
217:Note: This debate has been included in the
259:list of Russia-related deletion discussions
256:
236:
216:
200:apparent lack of notability in his field.
7:
24:
345:- false information, possibly a
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
588:02:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
571:19:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
554:19:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
527:11:37, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
497:20:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
444:situation -- I am not sure.
381:P.S. I also personally knew
62:09:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
474:16:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
454:15:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
412:03:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
395:20:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
375:20:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
359:cosmic background radiation
338:04:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
312:00:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
291:23:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
271:23:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
251:23:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
231:23:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
211:21:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
626:
538:used it to expand this one
281:. GS citations adequate.
598:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
357:and his team found the
363:Nobel Prize in Physics
300:Google books preview
462:"A.G. Doroshkevish"
76:Andrei Doroshkevich
68:Andrei Doroshkevich
529:
525:
273:
253:
233:
617:
600:
524:
522:
515:
513:
511:
509:
335:
330:
208:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
625:
624:
620:
619:
618:
616:
615:
614:
613:
607:deletion review
596:
530:
518:
516:
504:
502:
333:
321:
205:Quis separabit?
202:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
623:
621:
612:
611:
591:
590:
573:
556:
546:David Eppstein
542:Another source
512:
501:
500:
499:
489:David Eppstein
477:
476:
457:
456:
415:
398:
397:
378:
377:
361:, and won the
340:
314:
293:
275:
274:
263:--Animalparty!
254:
243:--Animalparty!
234:
223:--Animalparty!
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
622:
610:
608:
604:
599:
593:
592:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
572:
568:
564:
560:
557:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
532:
531:
528:
523:
521:
510:
507:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
479:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
422:
419:
416:
414:
413:
409:
405:
400:
399:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
336:
331:
328:
324:
318:
315:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
209:
207:
206:
199:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
597:
594:
575:
558:
533:
519:
503:
480:
417:
401:
383:Ralph Alpher
355:Arno Penzias
342:
326:
322:
316:
296:Leaning keep
295:
278:
204:
203:
197:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
563:K.e.coffman
404:K.e.coffman
304:K.e.coffman
161:free images
520:Sandstein
485:WP:PROF#C1
349:, at best
283:Xxanthippe
54:Sarahj2107
603:talk page
37:talk page
605:or in a
506:Relisted
442:WP:BIO1E
120:View log
39:or in a
534:Comment
418:Comment
387:Bearian
367:Bearian
351:puffery
198:Delete:
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
343:Delete
329:wister
325:wister
317:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
580:Nsk92
466:Nsk92
446:Nsk92
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
584:talk
576:Keep
567:talk
559:Keep
550:talk
493:talk
483:per
481:Keep
470:talk
450:talk
408:talk
391:talk
371:talk
347:hoax
334:talk
308:talk
287:talk
279:Keep
267:talk
247:talk
227:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
487:. —
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
586:)
569:)
552:)
495:)
472:)
452:)
431:,
425:,
410:)
393:)
373:)
353:;
310:)
289:)
269:)
261:.
249:)
241:.
229:)
221:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
582:(
565:(
548:(
491:(
468:(
448:(
437:,
434:,
428:,
406:(
389:(
369:(
327:T
323:S
306:(
285:(
265:(
245:(
225:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.