391:
Compounding this impression is the AfD for 'Vegalitarianism;' it contains an abundance of evidence most participating editors are against the ideas expressed in the article. I refer to "hear the screams of the vegetables, and they scream delete as neologism" and "sorry, veggies," et cetera. If there would be any support, I would expect to see some help in re-phrasing the title rather than suggesting the deletion of the article altogether. Further, the article is not about the word but about a well-established concept. Also, I did not make up 'Animal
Egalitarianism,' that is an existing combination of words, and I put this article up in a good-willed attempt (I also announced it on the AfD for 'Vegalitarianism') to find an acceptable title for the article should 'Vegalitarianism' turn out not to be suitable. Kind regards, Stig
291:
would be grateful if you could let me find a solution to this issue. I don't expect your help, naturally, because you seem to be opposed to the content of the article, even it it seeks to make the voices of philosophers past and present, who have and are suggesting that the rights of humans and non-human animals be merged, heard by vegans and carnivores alike. -- Regards, Stig
402:...ah, now it's clear. Many times, we use humor in an AFD when we feel a bit snarky - it doesn't mean we're against the ideals, though, it means we're just having a fit of silly. It would be hard to explain here, but if you look for a song called "Carrot Juice is Murder", you'll understand the joke. --
447:
Mr Which: please do not think I am trying to evade the policies of
Knowledge; I am, as I told Keeper above, trying to find a suitable title for a legitimate article on non-speciesist egalitarianism that is a non-neologistic term. I had just started on the article when it was labeled for deletion; me,
290:
Dennis and Keeper: I did indeed coin 'vegalitarianism' but 'animal egalitarianism' is not a combination of words made by myself, they already exist as you will see if you search. I am attempting to find a suitable title for my article; rather than trying to find reasons to delete it altogether I
390:
Keeper: Thanks for your reply; please take no offense though -- you have my respect. In your and Dennis' case it was the lack of support and lack of help that made me suppose the motivation for asking for the article to be deleted was more than simply adhering to the policies of
Knowledge.
375:
unless reliable sources can be found that this term is in use, and the article is cleaned up. Right now, it reads like an essay, not an encyclopedic article. If the outcome will be deleted, stig might request userfication to work on the article, and move it to mainspace once it is ready.
268:
I actually was referring to the term in this Afd, which does pull hits under Google, and appears to be a term used in discourse in the vegan/animal rights community. "Vegalitarianism" of course, is another matter.
138:, which itself is up in AFD as a neologism at the time of this posting. Opened up separately in another AFD as a result, but I'm open to a speedy if the parent AFD doesn't hold out.
333:. I want Knowledge to have articles that are of real topics. Not words you made up. Sorry, you won't sway me on this one, it's pretty much cut and dry. Whether I eat turkey
361:, and potentially block this user if they keep intentionally reintroducing neologisms, against consensus. Blocks are preventative, and were designed for just this type of SPA.
123:
305:
What gives you the idea that I'm against the content? I don't care about the content to that capacity, and no doubt the concept exists. It is still a neologism. --
165:
496:
I suggest stig blanks the page, making it an eligable candidate for G7, and then have it userfied to his page for further work, and possible reintroduction.
448:
as well as other, more prominent philosophers and writers, will be working on it over time to offer a complete insight on the subject. -- Kind regards, Stig
96:
91:
100:
83:
476:
329:
I am not opposed to the content of the article, and your suggestion here that I'm somehow against animals is absurd, and borders on
415:
318:
151:
61:
17:
48:, and resulting redirect was speedy deleted G6. Hopefully this can be created per our standards. Non-admin closure. --
505:
488:
457:
440:
419:
385:
367:
353:
322:
300:
278:
259:
221:
194:
155:
65:
501:
381:
520:
481:
36:
87:
519:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
79:
71:
453:
396:
296:
497:
377:
428:
Stig, I'll reply on your talk page so that this discussion doesn't get to clogged with distractions.
470:
411:
314:
147:
135:
57:
362:
435:
348:
254:
189:
449:
392:
365:
292:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
274:
217:
179:
403:
330:
306:
139:
49:
466:
429:
342:
248:
205:
183:
169:
131:
244:
334:
117:
270:
213:
209:
338:
240:
513:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
235:
words either. Did you see "Stig's" comments in the other AfD?
164:
per nom, and per re-creation of an article already in an
231:. Um, no. Wiktionary doesn't want unverified, unused,
172:
alll the way. The author of both of these articles has
113:
109:
105:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
523:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
204:I was all set to argue, but when you read
46:Moved to user space for creating user
7:
341:is irrelevant to this discussion.
241:what Wiktionary has to say about it
178:in the Vegalitarianism AfD that he
24:
134:- is a near exact duplicate of
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
506:10:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
489:22:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
465:the article clearly violates
458:20:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
441:20:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
420:22:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
386:19:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
368:19:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
354:19:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
323:22:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
301:19:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
279:19:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
260:19:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
222:19:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
195:19:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
156:18:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
66:01:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
208:it really is clear. Off to
540:
130:This article - a defined
516:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
245:either of these places
80:Animal Egalitarianism
72:Animal Egalitarianism
180:made these words up
175:explicitly stated
531:
518:
498:Martijn Hoekstra
487:
484:
479:
473:
438:
432:
407:
406:Dennis The Tiger
378:Martijn Hoekstra
351:
345:
310:
309:Dennis The Tiger
257:
251:
237:He made them up.
192:
186:
143:
142:Dennis The Tiger
121:
103:
53:
52:Dennis The Tiger
34:
539:
538:
534:
533:
532:
530:
529:
528:
527:
521:deletion review
514:
486:
482:
477:
471:
469:
436:
430:
405:
349:
343:
308:
255:
249:
212:for this one.
190:
184:
141:
136:Vegalitarianism
94:
78:
75:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
537:
535:
526:
525:
509:
508:
491:
475:
460:
444:
443:
425:
424:
423:
422:
388:
370:
356:
327:
326:
325:
284:
283:
282:
281:
263:
262:
225:
224:
198:
197:
128:
127:
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
536:
524:
522:
517:
511:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
492:
490:
485:
480:
474:
468:
464:
461:
459:
455:
451:
446:
445:
442:
439:
433:
427:
426:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
401:
400:
398:
394:
389:
387:
383:
379:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
360:
357:
355:
352:
346:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
289:
286:
285:
280:
276:
272:
267:
266:
265:
264:
261:
258:
252:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
227:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
199:
196:
193:
187:
181:
177:
176:
171:
167:
163:
160:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
145:
144:
137:
133:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
515:
512:
493:
462:
450:Shousokutsuu
404:
393:Shousokutsuu
372:
358:
307:
293:Shousokutsuu
287:
236:
232:
228:
201:
174:
173:
161:
140:
129:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
331:incivility
210:Wiktionary
132:neologism
363:Mr Which
339:Tofurkey
335:tomorrow
124:View log
494:Comment
233:made up
229:comment
97:protect
92:history
472:Chris!
467:WP:NEO
463:Delete
431:Keeper
373:Delete
359:Delete
344:Keeper
271:Xymmax
250:Keeper
214:Xymmax
206:WP:NEO
202:Delete
185:Keeper
170:WP:NEO
162:Delete
101:delete
416:stuff
319:stuff
152:stuff
118:views
110:watch
106:links
62:stuff
16:<
502:talk
454:talk
414:and
412:Rawr
397:talk
382:talk
317:and
315:Rawr
297:talk
288:Keep
275:talk
239:See
218:talk
150:and
148:Rawr
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
60:and
58:Rawr
337:or
247:.
243:in
182:.
168:.
166:AfD
122:– (
504:)
456:)
437:76
434:|
418:)
399:)
384:)
350:76
347:|
321:)
299:)
277:)
256:76
253:|
220:)
191:76
188:|
154:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
500:(
483:t
478:c
452:(
410:(
395:(
380:(
313:(
295:(
273:(
216:(
146:(
126:)
120:)
82:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.