614:), while other conferences are minor and mainly for the kudos of hosting a conference at or by a particular institution or publication. Others still are of international note. The one in question in the reference above appears to be the first one of its title and it seems to have reached at least the third one by now. Which raises a point - the paper was read in 2011. Presented in a parallel session rather than a whole conference session, it seems to have had little impact. The newspaper article, with a photo as big as (if not bigger than) the text, seems hardly an in depth coverage to judge by the Google translation (which I will admit is less than good - we could do to have a speaker of the language look at it). It must be remembered that if Einstein had posted an article on Relativity a day after his theory was made known, it would have been deleted. This has had three years (and no indication even of the patent being granted - can one patent a mathematical process?). Whether or not the method works, it's the notability that's at question. We do have articles on geocentric astronomy and the flat earth theories, neither of which work.
497:
685:
Division by zero is nothing new. At school we were taught that any number divided by zero is infinity (there is a special case: we were also taught that any number divided by itself is 1, and that zero divided by any number is zero; so 0/0 might be infinity, it might be 1, and it might be zero - but
609:
I've seen the patent application, and I'm afraid that applying for or getting a patent is not an indication of notability. Addressing a conference on a subject may indicate that someone has taken notice of something, but there are conferences and conferences. Quite a lot of academics get invitations
318:- I don;t see the significant coverage to establish notability. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; turning math on its ear with a new "way to divide by zero" does not seem to have caught much notice. --
166:
711:(mentioned above) has caused my virus scanner (McAfee Security Scan Plus) to complain thus "Threats Detection. Harmful websites: 1. These websites you've visited put your security at risk: ankurtiwari.in" --
209:, but there is certainly an assertion of significance and (since one reference shows him as a speaker about his theory at a conference) one can just about argue that it passes the
765:
Total lack of reliable sources, and at best this is claims of unsupported fringe science. That type of things requires lots and lots of reliable sources, which we totally lack.
202:
119:
250:
160:
270:
230:
378:
126:
532:
451:
360:
430:
I am unable to find significant coverage in all these links, it is requested that please mention the page no. of your 1st reference link.
751:
409:
213:
test. However, apart from that conference, I see no evidence that anyone else takes his theories or his supercomputer seriously.
92:
87:
96:
17:
306:
597:
181:
79:
148:
507:
since the images used in the article is claimed to be owned by contributer which is further confirmed by the slogan of
379:
http://www.ipindia.nic.in/ipr/patent/journal_archieve/journal_2012/pat_arch_042012/official_journal_20042012_part_i.pdf
561:
197:
Article (probably autobiography) about a 19-year-old Indian who has invented a method of dividing by zero and has "
793:
770:
302:
40:
591:
652:
528:
447:
356:
639:, no mainstream sources to provide a properly neutral point of view on this subject, who also appears to fail
142:
747:
405:
138:
789:
774:
755:
723:
702:
677:
656:
623:
601:
570:
536:
489:
455:
413:
364:
327:
310:
282:
262:
242:
222:
61:
36:
205:
he moved it to mainspace, so it must now be assessed as an article. I considered speedy deletion under
83:
766:
739:
397:
336:
57:
188:
719:
698:
648:
512:
482:
431:
340:
174:
75:
67:
743:
587:
425:
401:
610:
to speak at conferences that are really fund-raising events for the benefit of the organisers (
673:
619:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
788:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
632:
298:
278:
258:
238:
218:
496:
154:
53:
712:
691:
640:
583:
469:
386:
382:
323:
733:
390:
665:
644:
579:
547:
504:
206:
669:
615:
294:
113:
636:
274:
254:
234:
214:
199:
developed a new supercomputer based on his own invented mathematical formulae.
552:
319:
708:
508:
782:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
687:
578:. Press coverage, such as it is, is clearly insufficient for
546:. No significant coverage, no evidence of notability. Fails
385:
3) Article in largest and reputed newspaper group of India,
381:
371:
Don't Delete because article have
Verified Notable Sources
109:
105:
101:
173:
301:
will be an issue if coverage occurs in the future.)
383:
http://journalshub.com/mrp-admin/news/1319523997.pdf
734:
http://app.webinspector.com/public/reports/23893177
391:
http://www.bhaskar.com/article/c-16-665295-NOR.html
393:Sources are enough to get the article included.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
796:). No further edits should be made to this page.
511:which is similar to username of contributers'.
550:. Clearly a self-promotional autobiography. --
251:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
377:1) Government of India Patent Journal: Link:
203:WP:Miscellany for deletion/User:Theindianicon
187:
8:
269:Note: This debate has been included in the
249:Note: This debate has been included in the
229:Note: This debate has been included in the
271:list of People-related deletion discussions
339:as well as it lacks significant coverage.
268:
248:
231:list of India-related deletion discussions
228:
373:— article have the notable sources like,
201:" Originally a user page, but during
7:
666:Knowledge is not Youtube or facebook
503:Even this appears to be the case of
24:
495:
335:- Article fails the criteria of
468:as no evidence of notability. –
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
731:No malicious software on site
297:to demonstrate notability. (
293:—Not sufficient coverage in
775:02:44, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
62:07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
813:
756:03:42, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
724:18:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
703:22:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
678:22:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
657:15:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
624:11:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
602:22:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
571:19:26, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
537:18:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
490:17:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
456:16:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
414:16:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
365:16:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
328:15:34, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
311:15:32, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
283:15:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
263:15:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
243:15:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
223:14:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
785:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
590:are clearly not met.
686:is almost certainly
303:Lesser Cartographies
556:
211:credible assertion
767:John Pack Lambert
759:
742:comment added by
554:
417:
400:comment added by
285:
265:
245:
804:
787:
758:
736:
715:
694:
594:
569:
566:
557:
524:
521:
518:
515:
499:
487:
479:
474:
443:
440:
437:
434:
429:
416:
394:
352:
349:
346:
343:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
812:
811:
807:
806:
805:
803:
802:
801:
800:
794:deletion review
783:
737:
713:
692:
592:
568:
562:
553:
551:
522:
519:
516:
513:
483:
475:
470:
441:
438:
435:
432:
423:
395:
350:
347:
344:
341:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
810:
808:
799:
798:
778:
777:
760:
728:
727:
726:
680:
659:
649:David Eppstein
626:
604:
593:Sławomir Biały
573:
560:
493:
492:
462:
461:
460:
459:
387:Dainik Bhaskar
375:
374:
368:
330:
313:
287:
286:
266:
246:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
809:
797:
795:
791:
786:
780:
779:
776:
772:
768:
764:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
744:Theindianicon
741:
735:
732:
729:
725:
721:
717:
710:
706:
705:
704:
700:
696:
689:
684:
681:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
660:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
627:
625:
621:
617:
613:
608:
605:
603:
599:
595:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
572:
567:
565:
558:
549:
545:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
534:
530:
525:
510:
506:
502:
498:
491:
488:
486:
480:
478:
473:
467:
464:
463:
458:
457:
453:
449:
444:
427:
426:Theindianicon
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:Theindianicon
399:
392:
388:
384:
380:
372:
369:
367:
366:
362:
358:
353:
338:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
784:
781:
762:
738:— Preceding
730:
682:
661:
628:
611:
606:
575:
563:
543:
526:
509:this website
500:
494:
484:
476:
471:
465:
445:
396:— Preceding
376:
370:
354:
332:
315:
290:
210:
198:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
76:Ankur Tiwari
68:Ankur Tiwari
49:
47:
31:
28:
709:his website
588:WP:CREATIVE
161:free images
337:Notability
54:Randykitty
790:talk page
633:WP:FRINGE
389:, Link: \
299:WP:FRINGE
207:WP:CSD#A7
37:talk page
792:or in a
752:contribs
740:unsigned
533:contribs
501:Comment:
452:contribs
410:contribs
398:unsigned
361:contribs
120:View log
39:or in a
670:Bearian
641:WP:PROF
616:Peridon
584:WP:PROF
523:Penguin
442:Penguin
351:Penguin
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
763:Delete
716:rose64
707:Also,
695:rose64
683:Delete
662:Delete
645:WP:GNG
629:Delete
607:Delete
580:WP:GNG
576:Delete
548:WP:GNG
544:Delete
505:WP:COI
485:(talk)
466:Delete
333:Delete
316:Delete
291:Delete
275:JohnCD
255:JohnCD
235:JohnCD
215:JohnCD
139:Google
97:delete
50:Delete
690:). --
612:scams
472:Davey
295:WP:RS
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
771:talk
748:talk
720:talk
699:talk
674:talk
653:talk
643:and
637:WP:V
635:and
631:per
620:talk
598:talk
586:and
582:and
555:Kinu
529:talk
477:2010
448:talk
406:talk
357:talk
324:talk
320:Whpq
307:talk
279:talk
259:talk
239:talk
219:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
714:Red
693:Red
688:NaN
647:. —
517:ute
436:ute
345:ute
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
773:)
754:)
750:•
722:)
701:)
676:)
668:.
664:-
655:)
622:)
600:)
535:}
531:•
520:st
481:•
454:}
450:•
439:st
412:)
408:•
363:}
359:•
348:st
326:)
309:)
281:)
273:.
261:)
253:.
241:)
233:.
221:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
769:(
746:(
718:(
697:(
672:(
651:(
618:(
596:(
564:c
559:/
527:{
514:C
446:{
433:C
428::
424:@
404:(
355:{
342:C
322:(
305:(
277:(
257:(
237:(
217:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.