358:
don't get covered in mainstream english language press, compared to writers in other areas. Oddly, the publishers push for coverage and publicity in book review blogs rather than in MSM (probably know they won't get it). I know our definition of
Reliable Sources will exclude these, but FWIW there has
350:- Sci fi and fantasy genre authors usually get covered heavily in scifi/fantasy blogs/trade publications and not in the mainstream media (unless they are stephanie meyer or JK Rowling). And subject writes scifi "poetry" which is even more obscure. I don't know why but even biggies like
378:
I'm well familiar with the speculative fiction small press scene in
Australia, and while there are a lot of talented writers there, the vast majority simply aren't notable. And the notable ones do, indeed, get coverage and usually go on to receive a notable award (see
155:
110:
149:
300:
326:
115:
409:
And the sources you site are (1) her publisher, (2) a blog, and (3) a user-submitted review. So none of them reliable and independent. -
83:
78:
87:
17:
70:
170:
137:
359:
been coverage of her (as a person) and reviews for her works in the usual places where a scifi poet/writer gets coverage -
435:
36:
364:
223:. As Hobit said, there are no reliable sources to establish notability anywhere. Google books doesn't have a thing
131:
434:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
414:
400:
286:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
418:
404:
341:
315:
290:
261:
240:
214:
195:
127:
52:
177:
74:
227:
her, and neither does Google News: no reviews, no newspaper articles, no nothing. Thepisky, look at
410:
396:
282:
253:
206:
163:
249:
228:
257:
210:
337:
311:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
143:
236:
380:
191:
66:
58:
388:
392:
278:
351:
333:
307:
104:
355:
232:
187:
49:
360:
384:
368:
428:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
391:, etc). I don't see any reason to make a special exception to
273:
her, but I can't find anything in reliable independent sources
100:
96:
92:
162:
395:
for Ms
Schwader on the basis of her chosen genre. -
176:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
438:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
301:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
327:list of Poetry-related deletion discussions
186:I can't find any reliable sources for her.
321:
295:
325:: This debate has been included in the
299:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
231:: having published is not enough.
24:
205:Looks like a valid author to me.
1:
277:her, and she therefore fails
455:
419:05:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
405:05:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
342:17:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
316:17:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
291:06:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
269:- Plenty of stuff written
262:18:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
241:04:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
215:04:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
196:02:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
53:00:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
431:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
344:
330:
318:
304:
44:The result was
446:
433:
331:
305:
181:
180:
166:
118:
108:
90:
34:
454:
453:
449:
448:
447:
445:
444:
443:
442:
436:deletion review
429:
381:Catriona Sparks
123:
114:
81:
67:Ann K. Schwader
65:
62:
59:Ann K. Schwader
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
452:
450:
441:
440:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
411:DustFormsWords
397:DustFormsWords
389:Stephen Dedman
373:
372:
345:
319:
293:
283:DustFormsWords
264:
243:
218:
184:
183:
120:
116:AfD statistics
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
451:
439:
437:
432:
426:
420:
416:
412:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
377:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
362:
357:
353:
352:Robert Jordan
349:
346:
343:
339:
335:
328:
324:
320:
317:
313:
309:
302:
298:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
117:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
430:
427:
347:
322:
296:
274:
270:
266:
245:
224:
220:
202:
201:
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
356:David Weber
150:free images
365:interview2
361:Interview1
334:• Gene93k
308:• Gene93k
250:WP:Author
229:WP:Author
385:Rob Hood
254:Thepisky
207:Thepisky
111:View log
369:review1
348:comment
156:WP refs
144:scholar
84:protect
79:history
267:Delete
246:Delete
233:Drmies
221:Delete
128:Google
88:delete
50:Jayjg
46:delete
275:about
225:about
188:Hobit
171:JSTOR
132:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
415:talk
401:talk
393:WP:N
371:etc.
338:talk
323:Note
312:talk
297:Note
287:talk
281:. -
279:WP:N
258:talk
248:per
237:talk
211:talk
203:Keep
192:talk
164:FENS
138:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
354:or
332:--
306:--
178:TWL
113:•
109:– (
417:)
403:)
387:,
383:,
367:,
363:,
340:)
329:.
314:)
303:.
289:)
271:by
260:)
252:.
239:)
213:)
194:)
158:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
413:(
399:(
336:(
310:(
285:(
256:(
235:(
209:(
190:(
182:)
174:·
168:·
160:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
130:(
122:(
119:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.