117:
Prod removed by IP. Article is about a very non-notable subject. An abstract artist is not necessarily notable, even if she has some gallery showings. The article says nothing about her minor awards, and it is unsourced other than the links to her paintings. No pages link to this article, and her
193:
If you look at her bio she has work in the
Whitney, the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, the National Gallery, The National Museum of American Art, Washington, D.C. and several other good permanent collections, and more than twenty solo exhibitions, seems ok to me. Clearly though the article needs
292:
206:
per
Modernist. In the permanent collections of several major museums. In addition, the bibliography section of her resume lists dozens of reviews of her art, independent published sources about her and her art that if added to the article should make it easily pass
271:. I think she might be notable although at present though there is nothing to prove that. If sources and coverage can be found then I think this could be improved. But if there is nothing to be found, no sources, then I wouldn't see a reason to keep this.
226:
shows notability but I found no works listed when I searched the online catalogues of MoMa, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston and the
Whitney. Overall though the resume looks convincing: it would only take a few of the press articles to establish
110:
133:
Google hits are pretty thin - artsy blogs and gallery mentions. Milton
Academy is a private secondary school - seems like she's a school teacher who wanted to be an artist.
147:
312:
several awards, also some reviews of known media, just passes notability - although sources and some expansion would be needed to assure and assert the notability.--
243:
many online museum catalogs are incomplete, with artists in the collection omitted from the online search engines, in many cases.
17:
83:
78:
87:
70:
331:
36:
330:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
277:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
301:
228:
260:
316:
304:
279:
263:
247:
231:
215:
198:
170:
157:
137:
124:
52:
272:
212:
154:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
74:
244:
195:
208:
120:
49:
313:
167:
134:
104:
166:
No need to be rude, most working artists teach for much of their career. But NN.
298:
179:
66:
58:
224:
48:. This article needs references, some of which have been cited in the AfD.
324:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
300:. Unfortunately the full texts cannot be accessed online.--
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
334:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
146:: This debate has been included in the
178:as no real notability is established
148:list of Visual arts-related deletions
7:
291:has a number of reviews of her work
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
317:22:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
305:18:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
280:10:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
264:04:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
248:13:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
53:19:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
232:23:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
216:15:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
199:14:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
171:01:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
158:00:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
138:20:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
125:19:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
351:
327:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
182:05:19, 8 September 2007
118:g-hits are rather low.
294:, and there's one in
302:Ethicoaestheticist
229:Ethicoaestheticist
160:
151:
342:
329:
289:The Boston Globe
275:
152:
142:
123:
108:
90:
34:
350:
349:
345:
344:
343:
341:
340:
339:
338:
332:deletion review
325:
273:
119:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
348:
346:
337:
336:
320:
319:
307:
282:
266:
253:
252:
251:
250:
235:
234:
218:
213:David Eppstein
201:
184:
183:
173:
161:
155:David Eppstein
140:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
347:
335:
333:
328:
322:
321:
318:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
299:
297:
293:
290:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
270:
267:
265:
262:
258:
255:
254:
249:
246:
242:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
230:
227:notability.--
225:
222:
219:
217:
214:
210:
205:
202:
200:
197:
194:improvement.
192:
189:
188:
187:
181:
177:
174:
172:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
149:
145:
141:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
126:
122:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
326:
323:
309:
295:
288:
284:
268:
261:24.11.202.83
256:
240:
220:
203:
190:
185:
175:
163:
143:
130:
116:
46:No consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
259:per above
223:. Her bio
67:Anne Neely
59:Anne Neely
310:Weak keep
285:Weak keep
269:Weak keep
245:Modernist
196:Modernist
274:Seraphim
121:Reywas92
111:View log
50:Tyrenius
314:JForget
296:ARTNews
241:Comment
221:Comment
168:Johnbod
135:MarkBul
84:protect
79:history
209:WP:BIO
186:(UTC)
176:Delete
164:Delete
131:Delete
88:delete
180:Corpx
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
257:Keep
211:. —
204:Keep
191:Keep
144:Note
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
150:.
109:– (
287:.
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
153:—
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.