Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Another Digance Indulgence - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

224: 265: 127: 153: 327:
The topic has too little information to support a separate article, but that doesn't warrant outright deletion. It is better to point readers to the mention in the Digance article. -
120: 280:. Notability guidelines do not include being broadcast on the BBC because it's not sufficient when there are no sources. However we're now about to get hit with a flood of 178: 87: 82: 203:
The actor was redlinked because his surname was misspelled -- it has been corrected and he is notable. Being broadcast on a national radio network is notable.
91: 74: 264:
It's not binding but it's not irrelevant because it's relate don the same subject with the same arguments. It shows a pattern of recent AfDs and redlinks
268:
and in the above-linked previous AfD]], which were subsequently re-nominated and deleted. All of which have closed as delete because there has been no
250:. And for the sake of debate, why would a program broadcast on a national network with a notable entertainer as its star not be considered notable? 17: 376: 359: 334: 319: 292: 259: 235: 212: 192: 167: 142: 56: 391: 36: 78: 285: 228: 185: 160: 135: 284:
despite there being no evidence of notability. So this one will close as no consensus. Sigh. So not productive.
277: 247: 70: 62: 390:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
332: 255: 208: 372: 353: 328: 315: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
251: 204: 368: 347: 343: 307: 227:
most recent one. Simply being broadcast on the BBC does not provide sufficient notability
273: 269: 311: 50: 108: 246:
I would think the other AfD's result is irrelevant to this discussion, as per
134:
Being broadcast on the BBC Radio 2 is not sufficient for notability.
384:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
221:
Being broadcast on a national radio network is notable.
115: 104: 100: 96: 154:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
130:in October 2008. Eight half-hour episodes in 1987. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 394:). No further edits should be made to this page. 367:: article duplication/fork of Richard Digance. 306:- programme receives sufficient mention under 282:omg! I've heard of it. Notable notable notable 8: 223:recent AfDs have said otherwise, especially 179:list of Radio-related deletion discussions 173: 148: 177:: This debate has been included in the 152:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 411: 377:01:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 360:14:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 335:10:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 320:08:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 293:00:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 260:23:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 236:03:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 213:02:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 193:00:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 168:00:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 143:00:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 71:Another Digance Indulgence 63:Another Digance Indulgence 57:00:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 132:Starred red-linked actor. 387:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 342:- duplicate of info at 276:. Please also see 44:The result was 195: 182: 170: 157: 402: 389: 357: 350: 290: 233: 190: 183: 165: 158: 140: 118: 112: 94: 53: 34: 410: 409: 405: 404: 403: 401: 400: 399: 398: 392:deletion review 385: 358: 352: 346: 344:Richard Digance 308:Richard Digance 286: 278:WP:NOTINHERITED 248:WP:ALLORNOTHING 229: 186: 161: 136: 114: 85: 69: 66: 51: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 408: 406: 397: 396: 380: 379: 362: 351: 337: 322: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 241: 240: 239: 238: 197: 196: 171: 125: 124: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 407: 395: 393: 388: 382: 381: 378: 374: 370: 366: 363: 361: 355: 349: 345: 341: 338: 336: 333: 330: 326: 323: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 301: 294: 291: 289: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 244: 243: 242: 237: 234: 232: 226: 222: 219: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 198: 194: 191: 189: 180: 176: 172: 169: 166: 164: 155: 151: 147: 146: 145: 144: 141: 139: 133: 129: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 386: 383: 364: 339: 324: 303: 287: 281: 230: 220: 217: 200: 187: 174: 162: 149: 137: 131: 126: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 252:Pastor Theo 205:Pastor Theo 369:JamesBurns 274:notability 128:Previously 270:evivdence 340:Redirect 325:Redirect 121:View log 312:Rcawsey 218:Comment 88:protect 83:history 52:MBisanz 365:Delete 310:. . . 304:Delete 116:delete 92:delete 46:delete 354:hablo 348:pablo 288:StarM 231:StarM 188:StarM 163:StarM 138:StarM 119:) – ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 373:talk 316:talk 266:here 256:talk 225:this 209:talk 201:Keep 175:Note 150:Note 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 329:Mgm 272:of 184:-- 159:-- 375:) 318:) 258:) 211:) 181:. 156:. 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:. 371:( 356:. 331:| 314:( 254:( 207:( 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
MBisanz
00:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Another Digance Indulgence
Another Digance Indulgence
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Previously
StarM
00:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
StarM
00:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
list of Radio-related deletion discussions
StarM
00:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Pastor Theo
talk
02:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
this

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.