338:
and with bubbly enthusiasm, lets us in on all the delicious details about her private life. She tells about the craziest place she’s had sex, what turns her on in a man, and about her sexual fantasies. She’s so entirely ravishing, oozing with buckets of sensuality and unbridled sex appeal, so much so that it’s hard to imagine there was a time when she was a preschool teacher. Lucky for us, Aaliyah switched gears and took the fast track to porn super-stardom. Be sure to check out the NSFW version of this vid where
Aaliyah shows us her perky tits and delectable pussy. Not a sight to be missed!
792:(which I'm surprised to be typing given the number of sources provided). The problem I'm having is that the supposedly independent, reliable sources (like XBIZ) are almost word-for-word reprints of press releases. That's not "journalism" or anything approaching it. The rest of the sources, from what I can tell, are passing mentions in award nomination lists. We need significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, not significant coverage in material written by the subject's agent. Happy to reconsider, of course, but I'm not convinced by the arguments for keeping this presented above.
346:. At the same time I looked at the usual reguritated press releases - there is a clue when they include the press release contact at the bottom on their text. So which of this rubbish do you think is a reliable source and why? I'm certainly not accepting your assertions at face value given what is masquerading as a source already. Thanks.
355:
You're voting "delete" because of only one source in the entire article? I never implied that the ZZInsider source contributes to her passing the GNG. I said that she has sufficient coverage in AVN and XBIZ magazines to pass the GNG. And none of the AVN/XBIZ sources in the article are press releases.
337:
Aaliyah Love is Twisty’s Treat of the Month! A tasty, succulent treat, you just want to put in your mouth and suck on. She’s like an effervescent ray of sugar and sunshine. If she were a flavor, it would be orange creamsicle. Sweet, creamy, with just a hint of tart. Aaliyah sparkles in this interview
489:
I'm bored with your refusal to respond to reality but let me try one more time. If these writers were writing independently, how come their text and article structure are the same? By the way, are you sure Rhett Pardon is a real person? They seem to have no personal internet existence - not even a
504:
Spartaz's analysis is spot on target; Rebecca is just blowing smoke. These "independent" sources are just slightly retouched press releases and presskit pieces, entirely based on PR materials provided on behalf of the subject or her business associates. Compare this "independent" piece of
446:
Also, you started up saying that none of the sources were press releases, and when I proved they were you chanhed your argument. You are the one who doesn't do their work and you still haven't provided a shred of policy or evidence to support your arguments. Frankly you have absolutely no
406:
haven't done your due diligence. If you want the closing admin to take anything you say seriously you need to actually check your sources, cite them and then demonstrate how they apply to the GNG. Absent that its just unfounded assertions that have very little weight at all. Thanks.
306:. I don't even think you actually read the article before bringing it to AfD. "No independent, reliable sourcing; no reliably sourced biographical content"? Are you serious? There are only two primary sources (the ones from her website) in the entire article. The rest are "
402:. Rebecca there are some serious problems with these sources you are relying on. They are not only clearly rewritten press releases but they show you making unfounded allegations of sources not being checked when in fact the issue is that '
170:
242:
201:
Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. Only nominations, no awards; no independent, reliable sourcing; no reliably sourced biographical content. PROD removed without substantive explanation or article improvement.
262:
461:
Those AVN and XBIZ sources are reliable and independent of the subject. They weren't written by Love, a publicist, or anyone else affiliated with her. They were written by qualified journalists
437:
Its not independent or fact checked if its a reprinted press-release and we have been discounting nonsense like this for years. Your arguments are completely not based on policy or reality.
356:
Press releases on AVN are labeled "Company News" and press releases on XBIZ are labeled "Company Press" and none of the AVN/XBIZ sources in this article are labeled as "Company News/Press".
902:- no reliable sources? geez, there are plenty of them. she passes WP:GNG. We are not here to judge her profession we are here to judge her notability, and that part she does not fail.--
335:
For example. Look at reference 9 in the article which is promotional text trying to get people to pay to watch an X-rated video of an interview. The text goes as follows
123:
164:
222:
638:
399:
511:
The fact that PR material sometimes isn't reprinted exactly verbatim doesn't make it independent, it just shows a little dab of lipstick on the pig.
416:
The existence of a press release does not invalidate the news article written by a journalist on the same topic or event and AVN and XBIZ are both
916:
What sources do you think meet the GNG? We already looked very closely at the sources in the article so what part of my analysis is incorrect?
130:
470:
466:
387:
383:
574:
417:
307:
219:
375:
96:
91:
516:
207:
100:
17:
491:
370:
I'm voting delete because none of these purported sources are any good. Lets look at a couple. The first one in the article
715:
185:
632:
83:
152:
885:
reprints of press released and passing mention in long lists do not add up to the indepth coverage that is required.
512:
203:
941:
890:
826:
342:
Please can you explain how this source meets our requires and what encyclopedic information we can get from this
290:
40:
775:
744:
628:
457:
421:
146:
711:
570:
142:
937:
920:
911:
894:
877:
858:
839:
805:
798:
781:
750:
719:
702:
684:
675:
660:
643:
619:
600:
591:
548:
520:
497:
482:
478:
451:
441:
432:
428:
411:
365:
361:
350:
319:
315:
294:
274:
254:
234:
211:
65:
36:
87:
886:
817:
759:
698:
694:
286:
509:
192:
873:
771:
767:
740:
178:
79:
71:
854:
59:
656:
651:. Fails PORNBIO and GNG. Spartaz is correct about the low quality of sources for the article.
582:
565:
557:
270:
250:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
936:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
907:
793:
729:
671:
615:
586:
474:
424:
357:
311:
52:. There is consensus that the quality of the available sources cannot lift the subject past
158:
328:
Why the combative and accusatory tone
Rebecca, how do you know HW hasn't reviewed these
869:
578:
850:
763:
561:
303:
53:
670:- yet another pointless porn star article. Every source is a press release. Yawn. --
391:
917:
681:
652:
597:
545:
494:
448:
438:
408:
347:
266:
246:
226:
117:
903:
611:
732:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
332:
and rejected them as regurgitated press release and/or undisguised promotion.
285:
She has not risen to the level of notability required by the porn bio rules.
832:
506:
462:
395:
371:
390:
is clearly a press release - and something very similar shows up
930:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
243:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
394:. So another press release. The next purported reference is
374:
is clearly a press release - look - here it is a again on
263:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
544:
BLPs require much better sourcing then available above.
490:
linkedin profile. Its almost like its a made up person.
508:(ref #5 in the article) with this piece from a PR feed.
113:
109:
105:
177:
310:
that are independent of the subject" (AVN and XBIZ).
739:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
382:reporting? Me I call it a reprinted press release.
458:There are no press releases cited in the article.
422:explained this to you all numerous times already.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
944:). No further edits should be made to this page.
191:
8:
261:Note: This debate has been included in the
241:Note: This debate has been included in the
492:Fancy that happening in this day and age...
260:
240:
218:Note: This debate has been added to the
386:is a primary source and doesn't count.
400:AVN has written exactly the same story
849:. Agree with Stalwart111's argument.
7:
378:. Is this reallyt what you think is
680:Struck as returning blocked user.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
868:Per Stalwart111's analysis.
678:) 14:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
420:. Me and other editors have
710:- agree with Rebecca1990.--
961:
921:06:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
912:21:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
895:21:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
878:20:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
859:10:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
840:18:05, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
806:08:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
782:00:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
751:00:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
720:11:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
703:00:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
66:17:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
685:19:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
661:12:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
644:04:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
620:00:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
601:20:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
592:20:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
549:06:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
521:14:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
498:13:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
483:13:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
452:09:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
442:09:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
433:09:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
412:07:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
366:07:27, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
351:06:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
320:03:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
295:23:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
275:23:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
255:23:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
235:23:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
212:22:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
933:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
220:WikiProject Pornography
758:Please remember that
610:-seems notable to me
513:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
204:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
556:although this fails
712:Hillary Scott`love
693:- notable enough.
48:The result was
887:John Pack Lambert
835:
770:does not help. -
764:argument to avoid
753:
642:
590:
287:John Pack Lambert
277:
257:
223:list of deletions
952:
935:
838:
837:
836:
833:
829:
823:
822:
802:
778:
747:
738:
734:
636:
627:as not-notable.
568:
418:reliable sources
308:reliable sources
237:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
64:
62:
34:
960:
959:
955:
954:
953:
951:
950:
949:
948:
942:deletion review
931:
827:
825:
820:
818:
816:
800:
780:
776:
749:
745:
727:
398:but guess what
217:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
60:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
958:
956:
947:
946:
926:
925:
924:
923:
897:
880:
862:
861:
843:
842:
831:
809:
808:
786:
785:
784:
774:
772:The Bushranger
755:
754:
743:
741:The Bushranger
736:
735:
724:
723:
722:
705:
664:
663:
646:
622:
605:
604:
603:
551:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
502:
501:
500:
444:
340:
333:
323:
322:
297:
279:
278:
258:
238:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
56:at this time.
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
957:
945:
943:
939:
934:
928:
927:
922:
919:
915:
914:
913:
909:
905:
901:
898:
896:
892:
888:
884:
881:
879:
875:
871:
867:
864:
863:
860:
856:
852:
848:
845:
844:
841:
830:
824:
814:
811:
810:
807:
804:
803:
797:
796:
791:
788:
787:
783:
779:
777:One ping only
773:
769:
766:, and making
765:
761:
760:WP:ITSNOTABLE
757:
756:
752:
748:
746:One ping only
742:
737:
733:
731:
726:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
706:
704:
700:
696:
692:
689:
688:
687:
686:
683:
679:
677:
673:
669:
662:
658:
654:
650:
647:
645:
640:
635:
634:
630:
626:
623:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
602:
599:
595:
594:
593:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
567:
563:
559:
555:
552:
550:
547:
543:
540:
539:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
505:"journalism"
503:
499:
496:
493:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
455:
454:
453:
450:
447:credibility.
445:
443:
440:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
423:
419:
415:
414:
413:
410:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:This from AVN
385:
384:AVN Interview
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
339:
334:
331:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
296:
292:
288:
284:
281:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
61:FreeRangeFrog
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
932:
929:
899:
882:
865:
846:
812:
799:
794:
789:
768:WP:JUSTAVOTE
728:
707:
690:
667:
666:
665:
648:
631:
624:
607:
566:TonyTheTiger
560:, it passes
553:
541:
463:Rhett Pardon
456:
403:
379:
343:
336:
329:
299:
282:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
80:Aaliyah Love
72:Aaliyah Love
49:
47:
31:
28:
819:Subtropical
672:YasminPerry
475:Rebecca1990
467:Mark Kernes
425:Rebecca1990
380:independant
358:Rebecca1990
312:Rebecca1990
165:free images
815:as above.
695:Ilovepitts
633:Antarctica
583:WP:CHICAGO
558:WP:PORNBIO
471:Todd Lewis
396:again XBIZ
938:talk page
870:Hipocrite
653:• Gene93k
587:WP:WAWARD
267:• Gene93k
247:• Gene93k
227:• Gene93k
37:talk page
940:or in a
851:Finnegas
795:Stalwart
730:Relisted
629:Northern
124:View log
39:or in a
918:Spartaz
883:Comment
682:Spartaz
598:Spartaz
579:WP:FOUR
546:Spartaz
495:Spartaz
449:Spartaz
439:Spartaz
409:Spartaz
348:Spartaz
330:sources
302:Passes
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
904:BabbaQ
866:Delete
847:Delete
834:(en-2)
790:Delete
762:is an
668:Delete
649:Delete
625:Delete
612:Bali88
562:WP:GNG
542:Delete
469:, and
344:source
304:WP:GNG
283:Delete
143:Google
101:delete
54:WP:GNG
50:delete
596:How?
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
908:talk
900:Keep
891:talk
874:talk
855:talk
828:talk
821:-man
813:Keep
716:talk
708:Keep
699:talk
691:Keep
676:talk
657:talk
616:talk
608:Keep
554:Keep
517:talk
479:talk
429:talk
392:here
372:XBIZ
362:talk
316:talk
300:Keep
291:talk
271:talk
251:talk
231:talk
208:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
801:111
564:.--
404:YOU
376:AVN
193:TWL
122:– (
910:)
893:)
876:)
857:)
718:)
701:)
659:)
618:)
585:/
581:/
577:/
573:/
519:)
481:)
473:.
465:,
431:)
364:)
318:)
293:)
273:)
265:.
253:)
245:.
233:)
225:.
210:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
906:(
889:(
872:(
853:(
714:(
697:(
674:(
655:(
641:)
639:₵
637:(
614:(
589:)
575:C
571:T
569:(
515:(
477:(
427:(
360:(
314:(
289:(
269:(
249:(
229:(
206:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
58:§
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.