172:. I am seeing lots of hits in Google Books (not just for his books but for people writing about him) and in Google Scholar. His news coverage is showing up in Google News but it is old and seems to be pay-to-view content. I have added the court ruling as a reference and will tag for rescue. The article needs a lot of work but I am pretty sure he is notable. --
303:
If it has so people should add references. I take it to AFD if its an unreferenced bio for a long time. This is like that. Someone now fixed it and itis referenced so withdraw. I am wiling to nominate for deletion if its 1 a bio 2 unreferenced 3 been unreferecned for at least a year.
279:
to show that the event has had repercussions in law and society and not only was covered in depth at the time, but continues to receive coverage for its ramifications. Not being referenced is no reason for deletion if they are available.
243:
191:
121:
217:
388:- At first glance this articles appears to be about a person notable only for one event, however this event/person has legs so it deserves an article.
276:
17:
437:
314:
272:
138:
375:
88:
83:
92:
155:
be easy to demonstrate notability if it is true and not overstated. This may be rescuable. I will see what I can dig up. --
75:
456:
36:
289:
455:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
441:
433:
422:
397:
380:
347:
318:
310:
294:
258:
254:
232:
228:
206:
202:
181:
177:
164:
160:
142:
134:
57:
370:
282:
393:
271:. I did my own cursory search before moving from the article to the AfD. I found multiple hits in
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
410:
429:
306:
268:
250:
224:
198:
173:
156:
130:
366:
356:
418:
389:
343:
53:
360:
71:
63:
109:
334:, it had clear indicia of notability; it just needed references. DanielRigal's
275:
that would prove suitable for expansion and sourcing, as well as enough hits in
338:
have provided references to back up the claims. Keeping is now a no-brainer.
414:
339:
49:
409:
made to the article since its nomination, I suggest we invoke the
449:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
427:
Keep and withdraw. Article now has referneces so it is ok.
244:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
406:
335:
331:
116:
105:
101:
97:
192:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
459:). No further edits should be made to this page.
405:In light of the near-unanimity here, and the
8:
151:. My first thought on reading it is that it
238:
212:
186:
48:nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure).
242:: This debate has been included in the
218:list of Law-related deletion discussions
216:: This debate has been included in the
190:: This debate has been included in the
128:UNreferenced biography. Please delete.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
355:Seems to me that there are enough
24:
1:
476:
442:00:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
423:15:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
398:14:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
381:14:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
348:23:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
319:00:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
295:23:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
259:23:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
233:23:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
207:23:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
182:22:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
165:22:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
143:22:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
58:16:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
452:Please do not modify it.
413:and close this as Keep.
407:substantial improvements
32:Please do not modify it.
332:its form as nominated
267:in agreement with
44:The result was
379:
261:
247:
235:
221:
209:
195:
467:
454:
378:
373:
364:
285:
269:User:DanielRigal
248:
222:
196:
119:
113:
95:
34:
475:
474:
470:
469:
468:
466:
465:
464:
463:
457:deletion review
450:
411:Snowball Clause
371:
365:
283:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
473:
471:
462:
461:
445:
444:
425:
400:
383:
350:
324:
323:
322:
321:
298:
297:
262:
236:
210:
184:
167:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
472:
460:
458:
453:
447:
446:
443:
440:
439:
435:
432:
431:
426:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
382:
377:
374:
368:
362:
358:
354:
351:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
325:
320:
317:
316:
312:
309:
308:
302:
301:
300:
299:
296:
293:
292:
291:
287:
286:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
260:
256:
252:
245:
241:
237:
234:
230:
226:
219:
215:
211:
208:
204:
200:
193:
189:
185:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
141:
140:
136:
133:
132:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
451:
448:
436:
428:
402:
385:
352:
327:
313:
305:
290:
288:
281:
273:Google Books
264:
239:
213:
187:
169:
152:
148:
137:
129:
127:
72:Aaron Fricke
64:Aaron Fricke
45:
43:
31:
28:
277:Google News
251:DanielRigal
225:DanielRigal
199:DanielRigal
174:DanielRigal
157:DanielRigal
390:Unionsoap
359:to meet
330:Even in
284:Schmidt,
122:View log
403:Comment
149:Comment
89:protect
84:history
372:Yes?
153:should
117:delete
93:delete
357:WP:RS
336:edits
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
438:Fool
430:Alio
419:talk
415:TJRC
394:talk
386:Keep
367:Ched
361:WP:N
353:Keep
344:talk
340:TJRC
328:Keep
315:Fool
307:Alio
265:Keep
255:talk
240:Note
229:talk
214:Note
203:talk
188:Note
178:talk
170:Keep
161:talk
139:Fool
131:Alio
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
50:Whpq
46:Keep
434:The
311:The
135:The
421:)
396:)
376:©
369::
363:—
346:)
257:)
246:.
231:)
220:.
205:)
194:.
180:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
417:(
392:(
342:(
253:(
249:—
227:(
223:—
201:(
197:—
176:(
159:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.