359:. I searched for a bunch of different keyword combinations in google and could only come up with notes from mindprod.com which is the application writers home page. It doesn't appear to be a programming language but rather a simple dos application that he stopped updating and lost the notes/installtion for three decased ago, he also mentions someone told him that NASA cannibalized his code, that's as much as I can find about the application, him and NASA (self published reference to nasa @
274:"Which author, the author of the Byte article or the author of the WP article?" Sorry, it was authored by the author of the "Abundance Language" Roedy Green, he submitted an article to "byte magazine" about the language he was allegedly working on, there are no other references to it or its use anywhere else I can find other than his own writings in that article and his blog.
98:
93:
88:
385:- where he remarks that "I have left this tombstone entry for historical interest". Perhaps sadly, history seems to have taken little or no interest at all - and without independent sources, neither will Knowledge (XXG). Self-promotion, even in
463:- If no one, as a result of three deletion discussions, has found any citations to prevent further deletion proposals, then I think it's reasonable to conclude that such citations simply don't exist, and this isn't a notable subject. --
200:
231:
There are no references other than an old article in Byte
Magazine which was a self submitted article by the author, the claims put in the article have had no references despite a request for them nearly 3 years prior.
83:
292:, a very reliable source indeed, even if writen by the creator of the language, takes this out of the self-published category, However, I am not sure if a single published reference is sufficient.
194:
160:
153:
126:
121:
130:
424:
113:
506:
472:
455:
431:
415:
398:
372:
335:
312:
298:
283:
269:
241:
66:
215:
182:
406:. I don't see any evidence of significant coverage by reliable sources. Apparently too obscure to be remembered by anyone but the author.
176:
17:
172:
247:"was a self submitted article by the author..." Which author, the author of the Byte article or the author of the WP article? --
222:
325:
s editorial staff passed the article, then I think we can consider this "coverage in an independent source". Whether it is
117:
501:
303:
While it takes it out of "self published", it doesn't make Green writing about Green's program any more "independent". --
525:
40:
109:
72:
411:
188:
304:
469:
451:
394:
521:
428:
407:
260:
36:
279:
237:
356:
481:
465:
447:
208:
333:
296:
57:
498:
390:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
520:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
368:
252:
443:
352:
275:
233:
330:
293:
54:
485:
389:
magazine, cannot substitute for demonstrable notability from independent sources.
147:
364:
383:
99:
Articles for deletion/Abundance (programming language) (4th nomination)
94:
Articles for deletion/Abundance (programming language) (3rd nomination)
89:
Articles for deletion/Abundance (programming language) (2nd nomination)
360:
382:. I've searched, and come up with nothing beyond Green's own blog
514:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
143:
139:
135:
442:. Without reliable secondary sources it does not pass
207:
84:
Articles for deletion/Abundance (programming language)
221:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
528:). No further edits should be made to this page.
425:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
8:
423:Note: This debate has been included in the
422:
288:I would point out that being publised by
317:Green wasn't independant of course, but
81:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
79:
24:
361:http://mindprod.com/precis/ab.txt
110:Abundance (programming language)
73:Abundance (programming language)
329:coverage is still a question.
321:surely was. If we assume that
1:
480:- As so eloquently stated by
67:01:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
507:20:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
473:04:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
456:18:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
432:17:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
416:22:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
399:21:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
373:21:21, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
336:16:25, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
313:16:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
299:15:55, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
284:20:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
270:19:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
242:18:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
545:
517:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
308:aka The Red Pen of Doom
78:AfDs for this article:
482:User:John Broughton
434:
309:
536:
519:
496:
491:
488:
468:
429:Northamerica1000
408:NinjaRobotPirate
351:Appears to fail
310:
307:
268:
267:
263:
257:
251:
226:
225:
211:
163:
151:
133:
65:
34:
544:
543:
539:
538:
537:
535:
534:
533:
532:
526:deletion review
515:
504:
492:
489:
486:
464:
305:
265:
261:
253:
249:
248:
168:
159:
124:
108:
105:
103:
76:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
542:
540:
531:
530:
510:
509:
502:
475:
466:John Broughton
458:
448:David Eppstein
436:
435:
419:
418:
401:
376:
375:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
272:
229:
228:
165:
104:
102:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
541:
529:
527:
523:
518:
512:
511:
508:
505:
499:
497:
495:
483:
479:
476:
474:
471:
467:
462:
459:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
437:
433:
430:
426:
421:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
346:
337:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:
314:
311:
302:
301:
300:
297:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
273:
271:
264:
258:
256:
246:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:Find sources:
166:
162:
158:
155:
149:
145:
141:
137:
132:
128:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
106:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
63:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
516:
513:
493:
477:
460:
439:
403:
391:AndyTheGrump
386:
379:
348:
326:
322:
318:
289:
254:
230:
218:
212:
204:
197:
191:
185:
179:
169:
156:
59:
58:
49:
47:
31:
28:
255:Uncle Milty
195:free images
357:WP:SELFPUB
276:PeteBaltar
234:PeteBaltar
522:talk page
37:talk page
524:or in a
154:View log
39:or in a
201:WP refs
189:scholar
127:protect
122:history
478:Delete
461:Delete
444:WP:GNG
440:Delete
404:Delete
380:Delete
365:DarExc
355:&
353:WP:NRV
349:Delete
327:enough
306:TRPoD
173:Google
131:delete
50:Delete
503:What?
323:Byte'
216:JSTOR
177:books
161:Stats
148:views
140:watch
136:links
16:<
470:(♫♫)
452:talk
412:talk
395:talk
387:Byte
369:talk
319:Byte
290:Byte
280:talk
262:talk
238:talk
209:FENS
183:news
144:logs
118:talk
114:edit
487:Liv
446:. —
331:DES
294:DES
223:TWL
152:– (
62:man
55:Mr.
52:.
490:it
484:.
454:)
427:.
414:)
397:)
371:)
363:)
282:)
259:|
240:)
203:)
146:|
142:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
120:|
116:|
60:Z-
500:/
494:⇑
450:(
410:(
393:(
367:(
278:(
266:|
250:|
236:(
227:)
219:·
213:·
205:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
175:(
167:(
164:)
157:·
150:)
112:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.