174:
268:
as original research. If the proof really does hold together then the article creator should have no difficulty getting it published in a refereed journal, after which we can cover it on
Knowledge (XXG).
100:
95:
168:
104:
87:
127:
301:
134:
286:- the article as a whole consists entirely of original research and original thought. Even the one reference it references to, appears to be some form of self promotion. —
189:
156:
205:
This appears to be some sort of original research, written up as a wikipedia article. As we're not a maths journal, it should probably be deleted. --
313:
292:
278:
260:
241:
219:
69:
150:
270:
56:(article clearly indicates that it is original research and the name of its creator matches the author of the web page it links to) and
146:
91:
17:
196:
83:
75:
162:
333:
40:
309:
232:. There is no indication that this proof has been published anywhere, much less independent sources discussing it. --
257:
65:
274:
305:
329:
237:
216:
209:
36:
254:
182:
61:
287:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
328:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
233:
213:
206:
250:
53:
229:
121:
322:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
113:
109:
181:
195:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
336:). No further edits should be made to this page.
302:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions
8:
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:
84:About a Proof of the Conjecture of Collatz
76:About a Proof of the Conjecture of Collatz
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
212:23:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
314:19:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
293:07:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
279:07:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
261:00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
242:23:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
220:23:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
70:21:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
353:
228:as original research per
325:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
316:
306:Shawn in Montreal
251:original research
249:per all above as
344:
327:
290:
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
34:
352:
351:
347:
346:
345:
343:
342:
341:
340:
334:deletion review
323:
288:
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
350:
348:
339:
338:
318:
317:
296:
295:
281:
263:
255:Metropolitan90
244:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
62:David Eppstein
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
349:
337:
335:
331:
326:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
298:
297:
294:
291:
285:
282:
280:
276:
272:
271:86.17.222.157
267:
264:
262:
259:
256:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
218:
215:
211:
208:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
324:
321:
283:
265:
246:
225:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
49:
47:
31:
28:
234:Mark viking
214:Tagishsimon
207:Tagishsimon
169:free images
54:WP:CSD#A11
330:talk page
37:talk page
332:or in a
128:View log
39:or in a
289:Mythdon
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
58:WP:SNOW
284:Delete
266:Delete
258:(talk)
247:Delete
226:Delete
217:(talk)
210:(talk)
147:Google
105:delete
50:delete
230:WP:OR
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
310:talk
275:talk
253:. --
238:talk
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
66:talk
52:per
197:TWL
126:– (
60:. —
312:)
304:.
277:)
240:)
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
68:)
308:(
273:(
236:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.