128:. While the author removed a PROD, alluding to significant mention in the "real world", even the references he added all point to it being used in exactly one context: the physics of the hydraulophone. The term may have been coined solely for use with that one instrument, the notability of which I'm unfamiliar with. Can others please give an assessment?
232:
in
Scholar, and the word is used in the context of the hydraulophone, as the nominator mentions. It seems to me that if this is a notable concept in physics, there would be a lot more published on it. To keep this article, I would like to see multiple reliable sources verifying that this is indeed a
271:
it is being taught in hundreds of schools now, and integrating displacement is as fundamental as differentiating it. Absement, displacement, and velocity are perhaps more fundamental than higher derivatives like jerk and jounce, e.g. why not also delete jerk and
286:
I wouldn't say absement is as fundamental as velocity when velocity is a ubiquitous characteristic in physics while absement seems to have one sole application, to the mechanics of what I think is a rather obscure instrument. Regarding jerk and jounce, see
223:
This is a tough one. I was able to find some mentions and discussions of this on the internet, but precious few. Google books and scholar were little help, succumbing to many false positives such as the misspelling "self-absement". I
118:
148:
233:
notable concept included in a wide variety of scholarly discussions. Without that verification, we are flirting with a lot of problems:
17:
288:
85:
80:
317:
36:
89:
259:
72:
316:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
125:
190:
296:
255:
159:
133:
300:
281:
263:
218:
193:
163:
137:
54:
246:
277:
187:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
242:
292:
155:
129:
234:
229:
225:
211:
238:
176:
76:
273:
253:
this for now. Re-creation is always possible when proper sources are available. —
106:
204:
68:
60:
310:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
102:
98:
94:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
320:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
149:list of Science-related deletion discussions
143:
147:: This debate has been included in the
201:wikipedia is not an alien dictionary
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
186:used in the "real world". —
337:
247:something made up recently
55:00:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
301:12:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
282:05:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
264:18:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
219:16:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
194:02:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
164:23:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
138:23:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
313:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
51:Der Wohltempierte Fuchs
245:, even possibly being
289:WP:Other stuff exists
44:The result was
243:being a neologism
235:original research
217:
166:
152:
328:
315:
216:
214:
208:
202:
181:
175:
153:
116:
110:
92:
52:
34:
336:
335:
331:
330:
329:
327:
326:
325:
324:
318:deletion review
311:
256:LinguistAtLarge
230:reliable source
212:
206:
203:
179:
173:
112:
83:
67:
64:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
334:
332:
323:
322:
306:
305:
304:
303:
266:
249:. I recommend
239:non-notability
221:
196:
167:
123:
122:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
333:
321:
319:
314:
308:
307:
302:
298:
294:
290:
285:
284:
283:
279:
275:
270:
267:
265:
262:
261:
257:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
231:
227:
222:
220:
215:
210:
209:
200:
197:
195:
192:
189:
185:
178:
171:
168:
165:
161:
157:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
127:
126:WP:Notability
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
312:
309:
293:—Largo Plazo
268:
254:
250:
205:
198:
188:Arthur Rubin
183:
169:
156:—Largo Plazo
144:
130:—Largo Plazo
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
251:deleting
119:View log
69:Absement
61:Absement
274:Glogger
272:jounce?
86:protect
81:history
199:Delete
191:(talk)
170:Delete
114:delete
90:delete
46:delete
226:found
207:Chzz
182:er.
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
297:talk
278:talk
269:Keep
260:Talk
228:one
177:Prod
160:talk
145:Note
134:talk
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
184:Not
172:as
154:--
299:)
280:)
258:•
241:,
237:,
213:►
180:}}
174:{{
162:)
151:.
136:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
48:.
295:(
291:.
276:(
158:(
132:(
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.