399:
457:
The problem isn't the title, the problem is that this is nothing but a dictionary definition, and as such needs to go to wiktionary or else be expanded to something far more than a definition, or, if a larger article on related concepts exists, then merged into that. That it exists isn't enough for
156:
323:] I presume there is a larger article about the general overall concepts, of which this is a part. If such an article exists, then this should be merged into it. Otherwise, it needs to go over to Wiktionary.
237:
117:
207:
150:
196:
192:
506:
483:
445:
394:
377:
350:
329:
307:
286:
256:
226:
188:
491:
per the points raised by
Herostratus. This article has no real prospect of being expanded beyond the two vague sentences it currently has.
337:. It's a word made up by Donald Sull. The two references say, in essence, "Here is a word made up and used by Donald Sull". If and when
90:
85:
17:
94:
415:
77:
171:
138:
521:
36:
282:
132:
520:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
441:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
429:
433:
464:
128:
59:
81:
373:
346:
178:
278:
73:
65:
437:
411:
164:
360:
274:
250:
220:
303:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
320:
480:
369:
342:
144:
476:
per DICTDEF and point made by
Herostratus, unless it can somehow be expanded beyond that.--
295:
499:
459:
407:
389:
324:
55:
245:
215:
299:
341:
start to use the word in their own books and articles, then it'll be a real word.
111:
477:
428:
demonstrates notability. If the title seems unclear than it can be changed to
294:
per
Jonathanwallace. It took me a moment between teaching classes to add the
363:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
492:
50:
266:
270:
514:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
319:. This appears to simply be a dictionary definition. See
187:
Is this a solid business term, or a non-notable neologism?
107:
103:
99:
163:
368:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
238:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
177:
388:for all the same reasons I previously provided.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
524:). No further edits should be made to this page.
208:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
232:
202:
236:: This debate has been included in the
206:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
277:, took only a moment to find these.
418:) has already cast a !vote above.
24:
397:
298:to the article. Off to class!
1:
395:16:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
378:01:15, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
351:04:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
330:19:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
308:18:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
287:21:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
257:20:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
227:20:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
197:20:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
265:and expand per coverage in
541:
507:08:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
484:07:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
465:20:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
446:19:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
317:merge into larger article
60:20:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
517:Please do not modify it.
430:inflexibility (business)
32:Please do not modify it.
434:conservatism (business)
271:Harvard Business School
273:. And let's remember
458:an encyclopedia.
44:The result was
419:
380:
259:
241:
229:
211:
532:
519:
497:
462:
405:Duplicate !vote:
402:
401:
400:
392:
367:
365:
327:
253:
248:
242:
223:
218:
212:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
540:
539:
535:
534:
533:
531:
530:
529:
528:
522:deletion review
515:
503:
493:
460:
398:
390:
358:
325:
279:Jonathanwallace
251:
246:
221:
216:
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
538:
536:
527:
526:
510:
509:
501:
486:
470:
469:
468:
467:
449:
448:
438:Colonel Warden
420:
382:
381:
366:
355:
354:
353:
332:
310:
289:
260:
230:
185:
184:
121:
74:Active inertia
68:
66:Active inertia
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
537:
525:
523:
518:
512:
511:
508:
505:
504:
498:
496:
490:
487:
485:
482:
479:
475:
472:
471:
466:
463:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:The Economist
424:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:
396:
393:
387:
384:
383:
379:
375:
371:
364:
362:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
333:
331:
328:
322:
318:
314:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:The Economist
264:
261:
258:
255:
254:
249:
239:
235:
231:
228:
225:
224:
219:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
198:
194:
190:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
516:
513:
500:
494:
488:
481:(let's chat)
473:
454:
425:
422:
404:
385:
359:
339:other people
338:
334:
316:
312:
291:
262:
244:
233:
214:
203:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
370:Ron Ritzman
343:Herostratus
189:The Cavalry
151:free images
436:, &c.
193:Message me
461:Montanabw
408:Montanabw
391:Montanabw
326:Montanabw
275:WP:BEFORE
416:contribs
361:Relisted
118:View log
455:Comment
321:WP:DICT
300:Bearian
296:sources
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
489:Delete
478:Yaksar
474:Delete
386:Delete
335:Delete
313:Delete
129:Google
95:delete
46:delete
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
495:Reyk
442:talk
423:Keep
412:talk
374:talk
347:talk
304:talk
292:Keep
283:talk
269:and
263:Keep
234:Note
204:Note
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
502:YO!
315:or
252:466
243:--
222:466
213:--
179:TWL
116:– (
444:)
432:,
414:•
403:—
376:)
349:)
306:)
285:)
247:JN
240:.
217:JN
210:.
195:)
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
440:(
410:(
372:(
345:(
302:(
281:(
191:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.