Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Aduri (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

529:- the sourcing provided in the article does not establish notability. None are from reliable sources. My own search was unable to find any reliable sources either. Claiming sales on Amazon represents worldwide distribution is tantamount to saying that this criterion for establishing notability is pointless as Amazon will sell anything that it can obtain and ship, including self-published books. So essentially, everything has worldwide distribution. -- 187: 567:. I myself had a hand at removing author's COI, POV and ADVERT to bring it into line with policy and guideline. Earlier author matters not one whit once it belongs to Wiki.... specially if COI, POV, and ADVERT are removed by independent editors with no connection to the project. IMDB might act only to 480:
Anything put on film and sold commercially is in IMDB, so this is hardly evidence of notability, it is evidence of not being a hoax. No one disputes the existence of this film, just it being notable enough for an encyclopedia article. IMDB is as reliable as Knowledge (XXG) itself, that is to say, not
395:
Thanks for the feedback, i adjusted the wording somewhat. This nomination actually only summarizes the concerns of the DRV. With respect to distribution of the film, I understand WP:NF to refer to the possibility that people can go to a cinema and view the theatrical release and not just that a copy
494:
These AfDs and the article itself have atracted a surprisingly high number of similary argumentative anon-IPs. This should also be taken into consideration. I am not generally a deletionist, but in this case I have yet to hear a keep argument that doesn't amount either to a personal attack (how dare
607:
review is a credible source independent of the film. Stating "equivalent to a blog" (a statement itself not sourced so may only be opinion), is not the same as actually "being a blog". Kinda like saying a Ford Pinto is "equvalent to a indie racecar". "Equivalence" is not the same as "being". And
447: 370:
words pointed out by Knowledge (XXG) itself. Amazon distribution is also worldwide. Movie is independently reviewed by DesiChutney and listed on imdb.com and various other independent sites.
77: 194: 137: 456: 145: 450: 453: 441: 613: 305: 470:
distributed world-wide, as Amazon.com doesn't distribute world-wide. In fact, I doubt the DVD has paid the licensing fee required for multi-region distribution.
432:'s intent with this clause. The idea is that a notable movie would be procured enough that world-wide distribution actually that actually happens, not the 149: 72: 459: 477:
with the intention of promoting the movie (c'mon!, the name of the user is "Adurimovie", if that is not spam, I do not know what spam is).
203: 444: 464: 233: 54: 417:
Not notable, not a single reliable source, and started by a blocked promotional username, which then apparently double !voted in the
17: 377: 616:. Think they would overlooked if they were not mentioned at the AfD? Its weak, but it meets (barely) the guidelines for inclusion. 219: 666: 36: 651: 630: 555: 538: 520: 405: 385: 348: 320: 177: 56: 609: 192:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
625: 484:
DesiChutney is hardly a reliable source for notability, being the equivalent of a blog, generally not considered
466:. Being web-available != world-wide distribution. I hope that people would understand that this movie is in fact 104: 99: 604: 265: 665:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
108: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
588: 428:
Self-distribution via Amazon considered world-wide distribution is a novel idea, and against the spirit of
373: 249: 223: 474: 91: 52: 596: 208: 642:. Not a single proper review or other article indicating to its notability is included in the article.-- 381: 436:
of world-wide distrubition, which is what Amazon offers. That said, a search for "Aduri" in world-wide
618: 551: 496: 643: 516: 401: 316: 255: 186: 173: 639: 603:
pales when looking at all the others. Thank you for granting that the film exists. Further, the
49: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
647: 418: 547: 564: 508: 500: 485: 429: 161: 534: 341: 600: 572: 568: 437: 512: 397: 312: 169: 584: 283: 271: 239: 156:
not sufficient independent coverage and that a DVD availability at amazon does not
125: 218:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
396:
of the DVD can be bought in an on line shop which is no sign of distinction.--
95: 580: 530: 334: 144:
Article on an independent film. Brought here for further discussion after a
164:
to refer to the theatrical release. If those concerns cannot be addressed,
576: 592: 358:
meets WP:NF. Not spam. The key words in the nomination again are
87: 62: 659:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
473:
This article was created by a now-blocked promotional account
331:
barely meets WP:NF, I think; not spam, so I lean towards keep
181: 160:
amount to worldwide distribution as this might be intended by
212:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 202:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
132: 121: 117: 113: 152:. In particular it has been argued that there is 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 669:). No further edits should be made to this page. 440:revealed that it was not available in Amazon.at 232:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 8: 571:cast crew, but these informations have been 78:Articles for deletion/Aduri (2nd nomination) 608:there are still the unaddressed matters of 463:The only Amazon which has it is Amazon.com 300: 206:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 306:list of Film-related deletion discussions 304:: This debate has been included in the 226:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 70: 495:you attack independent cinema!!!) or 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 69: 24: 185: 563:as just barely, barely meeting 1: 222:on the part of others and to 575:by othe independent sources 73:Articles for deletion/Aduri 686: 652:18:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 631:04:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 556:05:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 57:03:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 539:19:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 521:05:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 406:08:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 386:00:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 349:15:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 321:13:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 178:09:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 662:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 264:; accounts blocked for 234:single-purpose accounts 204:policies and guidelines 68:AfDs for this article: 599:, so besmirching one 638:for totally failing 546:: trivial coverage. 475:User_talk:Adurimovie 488:in Knowledge (XXG). 438:Amazon.com websites 216:by counting votes. 195:not a majority vote 150:previous discussion 610:Passion for Cinema 44:The result was 511:for inclusion. -- 376:comment added by 347: 323: 309: 297: 296: 293: 220:assume good faith 677: 664: 621: 507:, following our 499:. If this meets 486:reliable sources 388: 346: 344: 338: 332: 310: 291: 279: 263: 247: 228: 198:, but instead a 189: 182: 135: 129: 111: 34: 685: 684: 680: 679: 678: 676: 675: 674: 673: 667:deletion review 660: 619: 601:WP:Verification 593:All Movie Guide 589:Cinema Montreal 458:or Amazon.co.uk 371: 342: 336: 333: 281: 269: 253: 237: 224:sign your posts 146:deletion review 131: 102: 86: 83: 66: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 683: 681: 672: 671: 655: 654: 633: 614:Maryland Films 558: 541: 492: 491: 490: 489: 482: 478: 471: 462: 423: 422: 411: 410: 409: 408: 390: 389: 352: 351: 325: 324: 295: 294: 190: 142: 141: 82: 81: 80: 75: 67: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 682: 670: 668: 663: 657: 656: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 634: 632: 629: 628: 627: 623: 622: 615: 611: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 559: 557: 553: 549: 545: 542: 540: 536: 532: 528: 525: 524: 523: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 487: 483: 479: 476: 472: 469: 465: 460: 457: 454: 451: 448: 445: 442: 439: 435: 431: 427: 426: 425: 424: 420: 416: 415:Strong Delete 413: 412: 407: 403: 399: 394: 393: 392: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 369: 366:. These are 365: 361: 357: 354: 353: 350: 345: 340: 339: 330: 327: 326: 322: 318: 314: 307: 303: 299: 298: 289: 285: 277: 273: 267: 261: 257: 251: 245: 241: 235: 231: 227: 225: 221: 215: 211: 210: 205: 201: 197: 196: 191: 188: 184: 183: 180: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 139: 134: 127: 123: 119: 115: 110: 106: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84: 79: 76: 74: 71: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 53: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 661: 658: 635: 626: 624: 617: 560: 543: 526: 504: 493: 467: 433: 414: 367: 363: 359: 355: 335: 328: 301: 287: 275: 266:sockpuppetry 259: 248:; suspected 243: 229: 217: 213: 207: 199: 193: 165: 157: 153: 143: 50:Juliancolton 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 605:DesiChurney 597:Movie Clock 573:WP:Verified 455:, Amazon.jp 452:, Amazon.de 449:, Amazon.fr 446:, Amazon.ch 443:, Amazon.ca 434:possibility 378:72.86.32.56 372:—Preceding 356:Strong keep 548:JamesBurns 497:WP:ILIKEIT 364:not really 200:discussion 585:Moviefone 577:Pub Films 561:Weak Keep 481:reliable. 329:Weak keep 256:canvassed 250:canvassed 209:consensus 640:WP:MOVIE 620:Schmidt, 569:WP:Verfy 513:Cerejota 503:tell us 398:Tikiwont 374:unsigned 313:Tikiwont 288:username 282:{{subst: 276:username 270:{{subst: 260:username 254:{{subst: 244:username 238:{{subst: 170:Tikiwont 138:View log 252:users: 148:of the 105:protect 100:history 644:Sloane 636:Delete 544:Delete 527:Delete 419:WP:DRV 368:weasel 360:hardly 166:delete 158:really 154:hardly 133:delete 109:delete 565:WP:NF 509:rules 501:WP:NF 430:WP:NF 337:Chzz 230:Note: 162:WP:NF 136:) – ( 126:views 118:watch 114:links 88:Aduri 63:Aduri 16:< 648:talk 612:and 552:talk 535:talk 531:Whpq 517:talk 402:talk 382:talk 362:and 317:talk 302:Note 174:talk 122:logs 96:talk 92:edit 581:MSN 505:why 468:not 284:csp 280:or 272:csm 240:spa 214:not 168:. 48:. – 650:) 595:, 591:, 587:, 583:, 554:) 537:) 519:) 404:) 384:) 343:► 319:) 308:. 290:}} 278:}} 268:: 262:}} 246:}} 236:: 176:) 124:| 120:| 116:| 112:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 646:( 579:, 550:( 533:( 515:( 461:. 421:. 400:( 380:( 315:( 311:— 292:. 286:| 274:| 258:| 242:| 172:( 140:) 130:( 128:) 90:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Juliancolton


03:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Aduri
Articles for deletion/Aduri
Articles for deletion/Aduri (2nd nomination)
Aduri
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
deletion review
previous discussion
WP:NF
Tikiwont
talk
09:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Not a vote
not a majority vote
policies and guidelines

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.