314:
loosely coming together) which has national scope in it's advocacy. If I understand correctly, the state groups that are associated with RSOL have merely adopted some of the same goals, but remain otherwise completely independent. Some state groups even seem to be more notable than loose umbrella organization they are part of. This is not the case with this group, but I mean if there is a blanket WP policy covering this, it's not necessarily wise in all cases. This is bit clumsy comparison, but I would liken this to NHL and individual teams with goal of playing hockey, which they do independently, but come together under NHL. I'm not US citizen so I don't know much about the formation of ACLU or NAACP, whether they came to be from multiple state level groups or was it the other way around, or how much control the national level organizations hold over state groups. Obviously, I'm for keeping this article, but let's see what happens.
338:, which is normally our minimum guideline (Professional Hockey teams have hundreds or thousands of articles written about them.) And , since the WP article talks almost entirely about the need for reform in this area and not about the group, it could in addition probably be speedy deleted via G11 for being promotionalism.
313:
Well, I kind of see your point but don't completely agree. Is there WP policy covering this? I might be splitting hairs here but I'm not sure if calling AFC as a state branch of anything is entirely correct. AFAIK, AFC has been around longer than RSOL (under which state level groups have started
197:
promotional article for local organization in one city dealing with a problem that is general, where there are many nationwide organizations . I do not se themas notable in any sense, and no notice besides the immediate area. WP is not
Wikilocal.
275:
It is a state wide organization, not a local one. It is mentioned at least in 3 independent RS directly. As it has its origins under
Colorado CURE, there are some more indirect mentions of this group dating back as far as 2005
166:
257:
160:
119:
217:
296:
Yes, it's state level. But we don;t include state branches of national societies. Even for much larger ones. Not the NAACP, Not the NRA. Not the ACLU. Not anybody.
382:
I'm not sure they're even a major voice in that, considered the breadth of the problem and the many national-level groups that are involved in the discussion.
237:
126:
334:
There is only one ref in the article that is about the organization--everything else is about the sex offender problem. This therefore fails to meet
92:
87:
96:
362:
article. When and if this organization goes 'national' and becomes more notable on its own, then that would be the time for its own article.
79:
431:
Not notable group and references mention group only in passing. Article created as part of a massive POV push by a single-purpose account.--
17:
181:
148:
406:
483:
40:
142:
464:
452:
435:
421:
393:
375:
349:
323:
307:
291:
269:
249:
229:
209:
61:
358:- This information is quite interesting and would provide a more neutral point of view if it were merged into the
138:
83:
188:
75:
67:
479:
417:
36:
319:
287:
174:
154:
448:
57:
461:
265:
245:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
478:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
371:
335:
315:
283:
444:
389:
345:
303:
205:
53:
359:
261:
241:
221:
113:
367:
282:
Not necessarily the most notable organization, but not non-notable either, IMO.
432:
280:
409:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
277:
384:
340:
298:
200:
472:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
443:
per MONGO. WP is not the place to advocate for pedophiles. --
109:
105:
101:
173:
415:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
258:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
486:). No further edits should be made to this page.
218:list of Colorado-related deletion discussions
8:
256:Note: This debate has been included in the
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
216:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:
235:
215:
238:list of Law-related deletion discussions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
503:
465:19:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
453:08:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
436:21:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
422:11:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
394:00:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
376:15:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
62:19:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
460:- per DGG's reply above.
350:22:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
324:09:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
308:03:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
292:02:00, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
270:23:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
250:23:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
230:23:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
210:19:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
475:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
76:Advocates For Change
68:Advocates For Change
424:
272:
252:
232:
494:
477:
420:
414:
412:
410:
374:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
502:
501:
497:
496:
495:
493:
492:
491:
490:
484:deletion review
473:
425:
416:
405:
403:
372:leave a message
366:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
500:
498:
489:
488:
468:
467:
455:
438:
413:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
353:
352:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
253:
233:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
499:
487:
485:
481:
476:
470:
469:
466:
463:
459:
456:
454:
450:
446:
442:
439:
437:
434:
430:
427:
426:
423:
419:
418:North America
411:
408:
395:
391:
387:
386:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:
363:
361:
357:
351:
347:
343:
342:
337:
333:
325:
321:
317:
312:
311:
309:
305:
301:
300:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
274:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
202:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
474:
471:
462:Tom Harrison
457:
440:
428:
404:
383:
360:Sex offender
355:
354:
339:
297:
199:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
480:talk page
316:ViperFace
284:ViperFace
262:• Gene93k
242:• Gene93k
222:• Gene93k
37:talk page
482:or in a
445:DHeyward
407:Relisted
120:View log
54:Davewild
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
458:Delete
441:Delete
429:Delete
368:Bfpage
336:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
433:MONGO
390:talk
356:Merge
346:talk
304:talk
206:talk
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
449:talk
320:talk
288:talk
266:talk
246:talk
226:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
385:DGG
341:DGG
299:DGG
201:DGG
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
451:)
392:)
348:)
322:)
310:.
306:)
290:)
279:,
268:)
260:.
248:)
240:.
228:)
220:.
208:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
447:(
388:(
370:|
344:(
318:(
302:(
286:(
264:(
244:(
224:(
204:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.