218:
SPA-recreated
Orangemoody article with questionable notability. It has several references, but most of them are blog-like or non-expert reviews, some of them are clearly affiliated or biased. In several of them AdPushup is not the focus, but only mentioned in a short paragraph as example for a trend
425:
but in recognition that the
Orangemoody-created version survived AFD with a result of "keep" (vs. a mere "no consensus to delete"), 1) double-check all contributors in that AFD to make sure there are no socks, and if there are none, copy all reliable-source references from the Orangemoody-created
426:
version on the talk page of this discussion, so if someone wishes to re-create the page using those sources he can do so. If the previous AFD was tainted by socks (and I'm somewhat suspicious of the IP editor based on another edit he made in the last two months), strike the socks and change
219:
or with some interview quotes (this is only OK, when the topic-related coverage is in-depth). With the article's history, the quality and reliability of sources should be closely examined. I am not convinced, that the included sources are more than PR coverage,
283:. It's a small startup, with $ 600K in funding. There's not much info available about it. There's a long discussion in a Google AdSense blog, in which the major participant is from AdPushup and others are telling him his comments are bogus.
430:'s "keep" close to "results invalidated / post-closure investigation found sock-puppetry" or something similar. I'm also taking note that the page was deleted as an Orangemoody-deleted page less than 24 hours after the AFD closed.
187:
86:
140:
381:
361:
341:
457:
223:
startup reporting and passing mentions. The nomination is obviously not so much about the existence of sources, but about their applicability to establish notability.
321:
181:
147:
286:
So it's not notable from either a business or a technical perspective. If they get another round or two of funding, it might make it on the business side.
81:
52:. While the recent AfD closing as a keep is a concern, participants here have invalidated the comments there through new analysis not present then. —
260:- The only thing notable about the company is that it received a small capital injection. Most of the coverage in reliable souces is trivial. Fails
17:
469:
448:
442:
417:
393:
373:
353:
333:
312:
295:
271:
250:
232:
65:
113:
108:
489:
202:
40:
238:
Sigh. I didn't see the first nomination (no talkpage). But still, a second look shouldn't hurt in this specific case.
117:
169:
100:
59:
163:
485:
36:
405:
261:
308:
284:
159:
410:
386:
366:
346:
326:
246:
228:
195:
104:
53:
209:
465:
438:
96:
71:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
280:
220:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
427:
304:
291:
242:
224:
175:
268:
461:
431:
134:
287:
265:
240:
If such a re-nomination is considered inappropriate, please close it.
478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
303:- Does not meet wp: notaibility and reference are week
130:
126:
122:
194:
208:
382:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
492:). No further edits should be made to this page.
362:list of Advertising-related deletion discussions
342:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
87:Articles for deletion/AdPushup (2nd nomination)
458:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
456:Note: This debate has been included in the
380:Note: This debate has been included in the
360:Note: This debate has been included in the
340:Note: This debate has been included in the
320:Note: This debate has been included in the
455:
379:
359:
339:
322:list of India-related deletion discussions
319:
79:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
78:
24:
296:19:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
272:15:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
251:14:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
233:14:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
82:Articles for deletion/AdPushup
1:
470:00:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
449:05:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
418:02:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
394:02:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
374:02:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
354:02:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
334:02:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
313:09:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
66:18:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
509:
481:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
404:- Marginally fails
472:
447:
446:
396:
376:
356:
336:
500:
483:
436:
435:
415:
413:
391:
389:
371:
369:
351:
349:
331:
329:
213:
212:
198:
150:
138:
120:
62:
56:
34:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
496:
490:deletion review
479:
411:
409:
387:
385:
367:
365:
347:
345:
327:
325:
155:
146:
111:
95:
92:
75:
60:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
495:
494:
474:
473:
452:
451:
420:
412:Rhododendrites
398:
397:
388:Rhododendrites
377:
368:Rhododendrites
357:
348:Rhododendrites
337:
328:Rhododendrites
316:
315:
298:
274:
254:
253:
216:
215:
152:
91:
90:
89:
84:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
493:
491:
487:
482:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
454:
453:
450:
444:
440:
433:
429:
424:
421:
419:
414:
407:
403:
400:
399:
395:
390:
383:
378:
375:
370:
363:
358:
355:
350:
343:
338:
335:
330:
323:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
278:
275:
273:
270:
267:
263:
259:
256:
255:
252:
248:
244:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
149:
145:
142:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
115:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
88:
85:
83:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
63:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
422:
401:
300:
276:
257:
239:
217:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
143:
58:
49:
47:
31:
28:
406:WP:ORGDEPTH
402:Weak Delete
262:WP:ORGDEPTH
182:free images
428:Sam Sailor
305:Shrikanthv
288:John Nagle
486:talk page
462:• Gene93k
243:GermanJoe
225:GermanJoe
37:talk page
488:or in a
443:contribs
279:- Fails
141:View log
97:AdPushup
72:AdPushup
55:Spaceman
39:or in a
432:davidwr
281:WP:CORP
221:WP:MILL
188:WP refs
176:scholar
114:protect
109:history
423:Delete
301:Delete
277:Delete
258:Delete
160:Google
118:delete
50:delete
203:JSTOR
164:books
148:Stats
135:views
127:watch
123:links
61:Spiff
16:<
466:talk
439:talk
408:. —
384:. —
364:. —
344:. —
324:. —
309:talk
292:talk
247:talk
229:talk
196:FENS
170:news
131:logs
105:talk
101:edit
441:)/(
416:\\
392:\\
372:\\
352:\\
332:\\
264:.-
210:TWL
139:– (
468:)
460:.
311:)
294:)
266:Mr
249:)
231:)
190:)
133:|
129:|
125:|
121:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
464:(
445:)
437:(
434:/
307:(
290:(
269:X
245:(
227:(
214:)
206:·
200:·
192:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
162:(
154:(
151:)
144:·
137:)
99:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.