481:
But, doesn't it also meet the GNG? Significant coverage, as it is the main focus point of the article, reliable as they are The
Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald, two well-known and well-respected newspapers, I am unsure about the definition of primary, seconary and tertiary sources, they are
174:
466:
Afraid not - I don't want to endorse WP:NBOOK (which clearly isn't consistent with WP:GNG given the low level of sourcing it specifies), and don't think that this is a particularly noteworthy book. I just wanted to note this.
127:
168:
100:
95:
104:
87:
299:
378:
134:
430:
coming a close second) as virtually all widely-published books and a hell of a lot of vanity press works meet it, but this does seem to meet its criterion 1.
226:
91:
189:
156:
258:. I couldn't really find anything to show that this book passes notability guidelines. It exists, but existing does not mean notability.
83:
75:
505:
491:
476:
461:
439:
414:
390:
369:
330:
290:
269:
250:
69:
150:
17:
146:
246:
196:
56:
405:
due to it having two reliable sources in The
Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald, in which it is the main focus point?
530:
40:
162:
286:
342:
303:
526:
262:
36:
487:
457:
410:
60:
282:
277:
or delete unless enough third-party media attention can be found to justufy a separate article per
182:
386:
240:
423:
206:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
525:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
427:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
501:
472:
435:
259:
222:
402:
278:
210:
483:
453:
406:
382:
236:
214:
51:
121:
497:
468:
445:
431:
218:
482:
independent of the subject, and I don't really understand the presumed bit.
519:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
426:
as probably
Knowledge (XXG)'s worst notability guideline (with
401:. I am the creator of the article, but doesn't it now meet
281:. In its current sourceless state it doesn't look notable. —
205:
Prod removed by creator. Couldn't establish that this meets
117:
113:
109:
181:
195:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
533:). No further edits should be made to this page.
496:The articles are lightweight promotional pieces
300:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
379:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
8:
377:Note: This debate has been included in the
298:Note: This debate has been included in the
376:
297:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:
84:Adam Spencer's Big Book of Numbers
76:Adam Spencer's Big Book of Numbers
24:
1:
70:06:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
506:07:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
492:03:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
477:10:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
462:08:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
440:06:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
415:06:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
391:23:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
370:09:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
331:09:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
291:07:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
270:04:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
251:00:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
227:21:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
550:
522:Please do not modify it.
448:, does that mean it's a
32:Please do not modify it.
213:. Could redirect to
256:Redirect per above
48:The result was
393:
362:
359:
353:
347:
333:
323:
320:
314:
308:
235:per nominator. —
215:Adam Spencer#Book
57:non-admin closure
52:Adam_Spencer#Book
541:
524:
366:
360:
357:
351:
345:
327:
321:
318:
312:
306:
266:
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
65:
34:
549:
548:
544:
543:
542:
540:
539:
538:
537:
531:deletion review
520:
365:
356:
350:
344:
326:
317:
311:
305:
264:
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
63:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
547:
545:
536:
535:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
442:
417:
395:
394:
373:
372:
363:
354:
348:
335:
334:
324:
315:
309:
294:
293:
283:David Eppstein
272:
253:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
546:
534:
532:
528:
523:
517:
516:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
480:
479:
478:
474:
470:
465:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
418:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
375:
374:
371:
368:
367:
340:
337:
336:
332:
329:
328:
301:
296:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
271:
268:
267:
261:
257:
254:
252:
248:
245:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
72:
71:
68:
67:
66:
58:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
521:
518:
449:
419:
398:
343:
338:
304:
274:
263:
255:
243:
232:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
62:
61:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
260:Tokyogirl79
169:free images
484:Jjamesryan
454:Jjamesryan
407:Jjamesryan
527:talk page
422:I regard
64:Ethically
37:talk page
529:or in a
424:WP:NBOOK
339:Redirect
275:Redirect
247:contribs
237:RHaworth
233:Redirect
207:WP:NBOOK
128:View log
39:or in a
428:WP:PROF
420:Comment
399:Comment
383:Grahame
265:(｡◕‿◕｡)
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
498:Nick-D
469:Nick-D
446:Nick-D
432:Nick-D
403:WP:GNG
279:WP:GNG
219:Boleyn
211:WP:GNG
147:Google
105:delete
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
502:talk
488:talk
473:talk
458:talk
450:Keep
444:So,
436:talk
411:talk
387:talk
287:talk
241:talk
223:talk
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
209:or
197:TWL
126:– (
55:. (
504:)
490:)
475:)
460:)
452:?
438:)
413:)
389:)
381:.
364:S
361:E
358:A
355:S
352:K
349:C
346:E
341:.
325:S
322:E
319:A
316:S
313:K
310:C
307:E
302:.
289:)
249:)
225:)
217:.
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
59:)
500:(
486:(
471:(
456:(
434:(
409:(
385:(
285:(
244:·
239:(
221:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.