159:. "Could fail" is not a reason for deletion - articles should only be nominated if the nominator, after doing some basic research, thinks that they "do fail" inclusion criteria. Also there is nothing about this article that gives any indication that inherited notability is claimed. Therefore no valid reason has been stated for deletion.
200:
demonstrates notability to an extent. The fact that it is a promotional interview doesn't preclude its use to satisfy WP:N. It is OK as long as the interview and publication cannot be considered a paid advertisement, or otherwise dependent on the subject. However, is this one interview sufficient?
176:
currently has 17 staff members, "who in a relatively short time have made significant headway" and "The current project of
Adaptive A.I. (called Project Aigo) is planned to be completed by January 2009." They hope to become notable. The references are promotional interviews at a few futurist
177:
websites. I'm not sure why the nom. mentioned "inherited" because their founder is not notable either--he tried to write an article on himself back in 2005, but it was speedily deleted.
132:
201:
What is the theatlasphere? It claims to be big, but it is unclear that it is reputable. Note that the interview of June 1 2005 has received zero ratings to date. --
218:. I am switching to neutral on this one, because DGG has addressed my concern by providing an acceptable rationale for deletion, which the nominator failed to do.
99:
94:
103:
86:
17:
242:
36:
227:
210:
188:
168:
148:
68:
241:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
197:
90:
223:
164:
206:
82:
74:
55:
219:
160:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
144:
202:
184:
61:
49:
120:
140:
139:
could fail WP:corp; in addition, please note notability is not inherited.
198:
http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns/050601-zader-peter-voss-interview.php
179:
235:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
127:
116:
112:
108:
48:, per DGG and Phil Bridger. Not notable (yet).
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
245:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
262:
189:00:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
169:22:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
149:05:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
238:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
228:13:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
211:13:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
69:20:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
83:Adaptive A.I. Inc.
75:Adaptive A.I. Inc.
44:The result was
65:
253:
240:
130:
124:
106:
66:
63:
58:
52:
34:
261:
260:
256:
255:
254:
252:
251:
250:
249:
243:deletion review
236:
126:
97:
81:
78:
62:
56:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
259:
257:
248:
247:
231:
230:
213:
191:
171:
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
258:
246:
244:
239:
233:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
212:
208:
204:
199:
195:
192:
190:
186:
182:
181:
175:
172:
170:
166:
162:
158:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
59:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
237:
234:
220:Phil Bridger
215:
193:
178:
173:
161:Phil Bridger
155:
154:
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
156:Speedy keep
64:Disclaimer
203:SmokeyJoe
194:weak Keep
133:View log
216:Comment
100:protect
95:history
174:Delete
141:Oo7565
128:delete
104:delete
51:Keeper
46:Delete
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
224:talk
207:talk
185:talk
165:talk
145:talk
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
196:.
180:DGG
60:|
54:|
226:)
209:)
187:)
167:)
147:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
57:76
222:(
205:(
183:(
163:(
143:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.