369:. It does not matter that an entirely different algorithm is being used to solve an entirely different problem. The article currently makes no coherent attempt to define its own scope. Until it does, I think I am entitled to assume the widest scope possible. That combined with several book sources and papers (
227:
I am the original author of the method and article. My comment was: "The article explains the concept of performing coordinate descent with an adaptive coordinate system with support of a few illustrations. Citations index is a weak argument. It would be better to extend the description of old and
310:
and is independent of what the nominator calls "the main paper" as far as I know. It would just scrape through the notability requirement on that alone, but I note that Pavlov predates (2006) "the main paper" (2011) so that is clearly not the original source of the method, hence is likely
370:
318:
describes the method as "well-known". Having said that, it is a truly awful encyclopaedia article as it completely fails to give any context to the general reader of what the article is actually about. However, such failings are not grounds for deletion here.
411:- must be provided on the talk page of the article. The article can still remain part of the encyclopedia if it is written from a neutral point of view but no one can promote their own research by creating an article about it.
166:
421:- the article creator's username implies a close connection to this topic and article. His/her edit history suggests that the creation of the account may have been for the purpose of creating this article.
346:'s Algorithm 3 look entirely different, solve different problems, and Loshchilov doesn't cite Pavlov at all. These appear to be distinct algorithms that just happen to have the same name.
52:. As no more comments seem to be forthcoming, I am closing this as no consensus, without prejudice to taking this to AfD again if the article doesn't improve over the next month or so.
378:
160:
119:
365:
I don't pretend to understand this material, but to my mind any algorithm that repeatedly changes coordinates in order to converge on a desired result can sensibly be called
270:
92:
87:
96:
79:
311:
independent of the original source also, and hence also counts towards notability. I also note that there are several mentions in gbooks results and that
126:
181:
308:
235:
148:
382:
312:
83:
17:
142:
521:
494:
470:
433:
399:
360:
330:
296:
261:
243:
222:
61:
291:
138:
388:) directly referencing Loshchilov in the context of adaptive coordinate descent scrapes it through notability for me.
75:
67:
503:
479:
446:
188:
540:
343:
40:
285:
239:
516:
394:
325:
154:
536:
490:
36:
231:
57:
257:
174:
513:
468:
389:
355:
337:
320:
217:
202:
198:
228:
new relevant approaches." I would be glad to know your arguments to support article deletion.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
535:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
429:
374:
279:
456:
201:
according to GScholar. The content of the article was previously removed from the article
53:
253:
461:
347:
209:
113:
425:
274:
529:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
506:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
482:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
449:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
307:. The Pavlov paper describes the method in reasonable depth
197:
Non-notable. The main paper about this method has been
109:
105:
101:
173:
455:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
512:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
488:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
543:). No further edits should be made to this page.
271:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions
252:The academic article or the wikipedia article?--
187:
8:
269:Note: This debate has been included in the
268:
229:
409:Conflict of interest? Original research?
208:PROD contested by an anonymous editor.
7:
205:because it was deemed promotional.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
522:13:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
62:10:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
495:01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
400:15:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
471:10:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
434:20:32, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
367:adaptive coordinate descent
361:21:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
331:11:52, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
297:02:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
262:11:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
244:10:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
223:10:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
76:Adaptive coordinate descent
68:Adaptive coordinate descent
560:
342:Pavlov's Algorithm 1 and
532:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
375:Glasmachers and Dogan
199:cited a mere 13 times
313:a paper by Tasadduq
203:Coordinate descent
524:
497:
473:
359:
351:
299:
295:
246:
234:comment added by
221:
213:
551:
534:
511:
509:
507:
493:
487:
485:
483:
466:
459:
454:
452:
450:
432:
353:
349:
341:
277:
215:
211:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
559:
558:
554:
553:
552:
550:
549:
548:
547:
541:deletion review
530:
525:
502:
500:
498:
489:
478:
476:
474:
462:
457:
445:
443:
430:leave a message
424:
335:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
557:
555:
546:
545:
510:
499:
486:
475:
453:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
413:
412:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
301:
300:
266:
265:
264:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
556:
544:
542:
538:
533:
527:
526:
523:
520:
519:
515:
508:
505:
496:
492:
491:North America
484:
481:
472:
469:
467:
465:
460:
451:
448:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:
420:
417:
416:
415:
414:
410:
407:
401:
398:
397:
393:
392:
387:
386:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:
362:
357:
352:
345:
339:
338:Spinningspark
334:
333:
332:
329:
328:
324:
323:
317:
316:
309:
306:
303:
302:
298:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
276:
272:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
245:
241:
237:
236:141.70.22.235
233:
225:
224:
219:
214:
206:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
531:
528:
517:
501:
477:
463:
444:
418:
408:
395:
390:
384:
366:
326:
321:
314:
304:
288:
282:
230:— Preceding
226:
207:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
371:Theodoridis
161:free images
344:Loshchilov
54:Randykitty
537:talk page
383:Tasadduq
254:Savonneux
37:talk page
539:or in a
514:Krakatoa
504:Relisted
480:Relisted
464:JAaron95
447:Relisted
391:Spinning
350:VVERTYVS
322:Spinning
232:unsigned
212:VVERTYVS
120:View log
39:or in a
419:Comment
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
426:Bfpage
385:et al.
379:Hlupic
315:et al.
275:JJMC89
139:Google
97:delete
518:Katie
396:Spark
327:Spark
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
305:Keep
273:. —
258:talk
240:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
356:hm?
218:hm?
189:TWL
118:– (
381:,
377:.
373:,
260:)
242:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
458:☮
428:|
358:)
354:(
348:Q
340::
336:@
294:)
292:C
289:·
286:E
283:·
280:T
278:(
256:(
238:(
220:)
216:(
210:Q
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.