Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Adhyapaknagar - Knowledge

Source 📝

331:. Human settlements are notable if they can be verified. Despite the claim in the article, Census of India has no record of this place for the 2011 census. However, search for Adhyapak Nagar does bring up a post office and coordinates in Google Maps. Not much to work with. 651:'s suggestion above. It's probably a name that's used locally, but the paucity of reliable sources, even if they're mere directory entries, would indicate that this is not a place notable enough to justify a standalone article. 259:
No clear relevance or reason for an article, especially one which is as poorly written as the one in existence. A major overhaul would be required to turn the existing article into suitable encyclopaedic content. |
228: 165: 348:
Appears to be a neighborhood in New Delhi, but not a notable place, and very little information to put in an article. Not in the 2011 census is a strong indicator that it is not a village.--
541:- while I agree with AusLondoner's assessment of WP:NGEO, not sure why they feel that this particular place meets that requirement. I can find nothing which shows that it is a " 222: 118: 159: 303: 369:
all legally recognised, populated places are presumed to be notable. Google maps apparently lists this neighbourhood as "Adhyapak Nagar" with a space.
277:. The content is poor, but one would think there are official documents which would give the bare minimum of information about it as a place. So 517:, but still it require improvement. Being poorly written or improperly formatted doesn't grant deletion of the article from the Knowledge. — 125: 592: 91: 86: 95: 547:" place. At best, it appears it might be a neighborhood, but not all neighborhoods are automatically notable, they have to pass 17: 551:, and this one does not appear to. If someone has a link to show that this is a legally recognized place than please ping me. 243: 78: 180: 210: 664:
instead perhaps as this certainly is not confidently solid for independent notability but this can be redirected instead.
390:, which probably should have been already been done. I have also begun a cleanup and requested assistance from editors at 147: 571: 435: 58: 701: 40: 204: 677: 141: 626:
It doesn't even have one cite, can't even meet WP:V in any meaningful way, though I believe it does exist.--
200: 682: 655: 635: 617: 598: 562: 533: 501: 497: 480: 456: 426: 402: 398: 378: 374: 357: 340: 320: 294: 267: 137: 60: 697: 587: 53: 36: 250: 608:
looks like it's notable, though the article needs more work. That's not a reason to delete it though.
187: 665: 353: 315: 236: 173: 613: 423: 82: 510: 493: 394: 370: 336: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
696:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
581: 274: 216: 153: 391: 652: 514: 489: 447: 415: 387: 366: 349: 307: 290: 648: 628: 609: 552: 548: 519: 473: 419: 282: 74: 66: 332: 112: 468: 411: 261: 286: 418:
does not apply. It's a small neighbourhood in the Nangloi Jat census town.
492:"all legally recognised, populated places are presumed to be notable" 414:. This is not a census town (as earlier claimed in the article), so 273:
If it is a place where people live, then it should be kept as per
690:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
574:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
438:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
52:
discussion and !votes evenly balanced after relist x2. --
108: 104: 100: 235: 172: 580:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
471:, as we have no sourcing to fill out this article.-- 444:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 704:). No further edits should be made to this page. 249: 186: 8: 365:Obviously needs drastic improvement but per 302:Note: This debate has been included in the 304:list of India-related deletion discussions 301: 488:Not only "census towns" are notable. Per 281:, providing someone can be bothered to 7: 24: 513:. The article is notable as per 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 721: 683:05:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 656:10:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC) 636:04:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 618:00:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC) 599:00:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC) 563:19:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC) 403:01:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 379:01:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 358:01:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC) 341:02:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 321:17:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC) 295:16:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC) 268:15:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC) 61:20:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 534:17:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC) 502:23:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC) 481:17:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC) 463:I like the suggestion to 457:16:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC) 427:20:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC) 693:Please do not modify it. 509:- Completely agree with 32:Please do not modify it. 386:I have moved this to 265:opened his mouth at 544:legally recognized 634: 601: 479: 459: 455: 323: 712: 695: 680: 675: 633: 595: 590: 584: 579: 577: 575: 559: 556: 529: 526: 523: 478: 454: 452: 445: 443: 441: 439: 318: 314: 310: 254: 253: 239: 191: 190: 176: 128: 116: 98: 55:Anthony Bradbury 34: 720: 719: 715: 714: 713: 711: 710: 709: 708: 702:deletion review 691: 678: 666: 602: 593: 588: 582: 570: 568: 557: 554: 527: 524: 521: 460: 448: 446: 434: 432: 316: 312: 308: 196: 133: 124: 89: 73: 70: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 718: 716: 707: 706: 686: 685: 659: 641: 640: 639: 638: 621: 620: 578: 567: 566: 565: 536: 504: 483: 442: 431: 430: 429: 405: 388:Adhyapak Nagar 381: 360: 343: 325: 324: 298: 297: 257: 256: 193: 130: 69: 64: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 717: 705: 703: 699: 694: 688: 687: 684: 681: 676: 673: 669: 663: 660: 657: 654: 650: 649:User:Utcursch 646: 643: 642: 637: 631: 630: 625: 624: 623: 622: 619: 615: 611: 607: 604: 603: 600: 596: 591: 585: 576: 573: 564: 561: 560: 550: 546: 545: 540: 537: 535: 532: 531: 530: 516: 512: 508: 505: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 484: 482: 476: 475: 470: 466: 462: 461: 458: 453: 451: 440: 437: 428: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 406: 404: 400: 396: 393: 389: 385: 382: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 361: 359: 355: 351: 347: 344: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 326: 322: 319: 311: 305: 300: 299: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 266: 263: 252: 248: 245: 242: 238: 234: 230: 227: 224: 221: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 202: 199: 198:Find sources: 194: 189: 185: 182: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 139: 136: 135:Find sources: 131: 127: 123: 120: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75:Adhyapaknagar 72: 71: 68: 67:Adhyapaknagar 65: 63: 62: 59: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 692: 689: 671: 667: 661: 644: 627: 605: 569: 553: 543: 542: 538: 520: 518: 511:AusLondonder 506: 494:AusLondonder 485: 472: 464: 449: 433: 407: 395:AusLondonder 383: 371:AusLondonder 362: 345: 328: 278: 264: 258: 246: 240: 232: 225: 219: 213: 207: 197: 183: 177: 169: 162: 156: 150: 144: 134: 121: 54: 50:No consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 583:Omni Flames 469:Nangloi Jat 412:Nangloi Jat 384:Please note 223:free images 160:free images 450:Sandstein 698:talk page 653:Lankiveil 350:DThomsen8 333:• Gene93k 309:Vipinhari 275:WP:NPLACE 37:talk page 700:or in a 662:Redirect 645:Redirect 629:Milowent 610:Bruriyah 594:contribs 572:Relisted 474:Milowent 465:redirect 436:Relisted 420:utcursch 408:Redirect 392:WP:India 119:View log 39:or in a 515:WP:NGEO 490:WP:NGEO 486:Comment 416:WP:NGEO 367:WP:NGEO 329:Comment 229:WP refs 217:scholar 166:WP refs 154:scholar 92:protect 87:history 674:wister 670:wister 549:WP:GNG 539:Delete 346:Delete 283:WP:TNT 262:Naypta 201:Google 138:Google 96:delete 244:JSTOR 205:books 181:JSTOR 142:books 126:Stats 113:views 105:watch 101:links 16:< 679:talk 647:per 614:talk 606:Keep 589:talk 558:5969 555:Onel 507:Keep 498:talk 424:talk 399:talk 375:talk 363:Keep 354:talk 337:talk 317:talk 291:talk 287:JMWt 279:keep 237:FENS 211:news 174:FENS 148:news 109:logs 83:talk 79:edit 525:ska 522:San 467:to 410:to 251:TWL 188:TWL 117:– ( 632:• 616:) 597:) 528:ri 500:) 477:• 422:| 401:) 377:) 356:) 339:) 313:|| 306:. 293:) 285:. 231:) 168:) 111:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 672:T 668:S 658:. 612:( 586:( 496:( 397:( 373:( 352:( 335:( 289:( 255:) 247:· 241:· 233:· 226:· 220:· 214:· 208:· 203:( 195:( 192:) 184:· 178:· 170:· 163:· 157:· 151:· 145:· 140:( 132:( 129:) 122:· 115:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Anthony Bradbury

20:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Adhyapaknagar
Adhyapaknagar
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.