309:
critics praised this achievement (it is actually
Romania's first 100% indie/guerrilla feature film), I believe this is also proof of Țofei's notability. I was fascinated myself by the achievement, which is why I tried to contribute as much as possible to both the movie's page and Țofei's page and tag them whenever I saw them mentioned elsewhere. It's odd that this behavior is interpreted as a form of abuse or self-promotion. It is not. I am still searching for more info and references to add to Țofei's page in support of his notability, please don't delete it again.
715:
disputable whether there are currently no third parties at all, since some of the sources do not mention only direct reviews and critical opinions of the critic who wrote the article, they also contain a general analysis of the status of Țofei in the film world based on all the praise he received in the film community.
714:
state and use the talk page to ask help with third party sources. There is no talk page and no proof that the community made any significant efforts to find third party sources, so the page should be given this chance until being proposed for deletion again. And also take into consideration that it's
471:
why Țofei is notable and he restored the page. I need some help here from the
Knowledge community, the second attempt to soft-delete seems strange, to say at least, given all the circumstances and the fact that the user who proposed it went to delete even unquestionable info about Țofei's movie from
278:
This was just soft-deleted, then restored. It's pretty obvious the IP behind the article is Țofei himself, a relentless self-promoter based on the number of articles where he's seeded this link. The fact, though, is that at present, his sole claim to notability rests on having directed a single film
394:
My single purpose here is to contribute objectively to things that I feel passionate about. Please do not manipulate the discussion, I never said that my single purpose is to promote Țofei and his film, I said that I am fascinated by the achievement. There is no conflict of interest in contributing
308:
The movie's notability hasn't been disputed so far, only Țofei's page. But since he did almost everything on that movie - directing, writing, producing, acting, cinematography, editing, production design, casting, production management, sound, sound editing, color, special effects etc. and a lot of
432:
These were the IPs automatically assigned to me when I contributed to Țofei and his movie. I am not a constant contributor, I contribute to
Knowledge from time to time and when I do so I focus on a subject for a couple of days till I'm satisfied with the quality of the edits. I worked on various
748:
Most contemporary filmmakers on
Knowledge have only sources based on their films in one way or another, and they are accepted as secondary sources. It would be extremely hard to find a source about a filmmaker (even top filmmaker) that no one could accuse of being based on his films.
354:, although the movie is Romania's first found footage horror movie and the first Romanian horror movie to receive international recognition. I've restored that, but all his efforts to remove the movie or the movie's director from Knowledge look suspicious.
669:) and multiple other interviews in film sites where Țofei is praised for his revolutionary approach on the found footage concept. And there is much more relevant info on the internet which is not yet added - you can find a lot of those sources listed on
571:
Yes, I will consider registering an account from now on to remove any suspicion of single purpose. I contributed to a lot of other pages, but I don't have a static IP, it changes, so it's impossible for me to prove anything.
184:
538:
because the movie is not spoken in
Romanian and it's addressed to a Hollywood celebrity, so it's not Romanian enough in his views. If this is true, it makes him biased towards anything related to the production.
247:
83:
530:'s page again and saw this in his "About me" section: "This user is a patriot who often veers into deranged right-wing nationalism." He is a Romanian, so it's possible that he deleted any mention of
769:
553:
Sorry, you're way off: I'm actually a filmmaker myself, and Țofei is a rival. My aim is to minimize mention of him throughout the
Internet, and hopefully wreck his reputation in the process.
508:. I didn't add that paragraph, I've just expanded it. And some minutes ago I actually deleted two festivals because they are not relevant for the movie's international recognition.
707:
595:- it would be helpful if 86.120.254.110 could stop sniping at me and actually stick to the topic at hand, which is whether the subject under discussion is indeed notable. -
178:
324:
I've added to the page more relevant info and sources in support of notability, compared to what was there when the deletion was requested, and will continue to add more.
241:
692:
The article builds too much on the websites on Tofei and his film. We need 3rd party coverage of Tofei that is in depth about him, and the article does not show such.
78:
52:. Consensus is that the available sourcing on the subject doesn't meet our notability guidelines. This doesn't mean the film he is known for making is not notable.
789:
137:
650:
144:
489:
There's nothing "strange" about a renomination under such circumstances. If anything is strange, it's that you haven't disclosed your apparent
750:
716:
674:
645:
I don't see anything wrong with most of the sources. There are two important awards in two film festivals with international significance (
607:
573:
540:
509:
473:
434:
418:
414:
410:
396:
379:, and I'll likely remove it again once this discussion closes and you fade away from the project, which you probably will, given that your
355:
325:
310:
557:
110:
105:
801:
781:
758:
743:
724:
701:
682:
640:
615:
601:
581:
566:
548:
517:
499:
481:
442:
427:
404:
389:
363:
333:
318:
300:
114:
62:
734:
Needs independent secondary or tertiary sources, which I can't find any. The sources all rely on his film(s) one way or another.
97:
199:
17:
166:
262:
395:
to things that you feel passionate about. And I also contributed to other pages as well, unrelated to Țofei or his movie.
229:
636:
560:. Whether or not that was you remains an open question. Registering an account helps dispel these sorts of doubts. -
670:
531:
347:
160:
821:
697:
40:
711:
376:
754:
720:
678:
611:
577:
544:
513:
477:
438:
400:
359:
329:
314:
223:
156:
739:
646:
632:
289:
468:
219:
206:
817:
36:
693:
433:
other pages in different periods of my life and all kinds of IPs have been assigned each time to me.
101:
269:
255:
192:
735:
172:
797:
777:
535:
505:
460:
351:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
816:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
654:
658:
596:
561:
527:
494:
422:
384:
372:
343:
295:
235:
464:
93:
68:
662:
490:
380:
280:
793:
773:
55:
131:
628:
279:(itself of uncertain notability); that really doesn't appear enough to satisfy
666:
708:
Knowledge's guidelines for articles without independent/third party sources
504:
I cannot have any conflict of interests about Be My Cat being mentioned on
421:, all your contributions deal with Țofei and his little movie. -
810:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
710:, the article should not be deleted yet, but instead kept in an
653:
in Sydney), three praising reviews/listings in top film sites (
346:'s contributions and looks like he even deleted any mention of
770:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
127:
123:
119:
254:
191:
84:
Articles for deletion/Adrian Țofei (2nd nomination)
467:was softdeleted. I explained to him in detail on
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
824:). No further edits should be made to this page.
651:A Night of Horror International Film Festival
268:
205:
8:
790:list of Romania-related deletion discussions
788:Note: This debate has been included in the
768:Note: This debate has been included in the
787:
767:
383:here is to promote Țofei and his film. -
294:, who authored the first nomination. -
76:
631:(just have a look at the sourcing) --
472:another page (see the comment above).
7:
459:I addressed the undelete request to
75:
79:Articles for deletion/Adrian Țofei
24:
556:As for who added that paragraph:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
627:- The article doesn't meet
841:
671:Be My Cat: A Film for Anne
532:Be My Cat: A Film for Anne
348:Be My Cat: A Film for Anne
558:another single-purpose IP
813:Please do not modify it.
63:21:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
802:00:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
782:00:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
759:08:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
744:23:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
725:09:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
702:03:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
683:12:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
647:Nashville Film Festival
641:20:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
616:19:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
602:19:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
582:19:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
567:19:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
549:18:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
518:18:30, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
500:18:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
482:17:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
443:19:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
428:19:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
405:18:30, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
390:18:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
364:17:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
334:23:54, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
319:16:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
301:15:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
469:User talk:Juliancolton
371:Yes, I removed it per
74:AfDs for this article:
491:conflict of interest
409:Untrue: whether as
633:Somedifferentstuff
526:I've just checked
342:I've just checked
290:Somedifferentstuff
804:
784:
694:John Pack Lambert
661:approved critic,
600:
565:
536:Cinema of Romania
506:Cinema of Romania
498:
426:
388:
377:WP:NOTADVERTISING
352:Cinema of Romania
299:
832:
815:
655:Austin Chronicle
599:
564:
497:
425:
387:
298:
293:
273:
272:
258:
210:
209:
195:
147:
135:
117:
58:
48:The result was
34:
840:
839:
835:
834:
833:
831:
830:
829:
828:
822:deletion review
811:
659:Rotten Tomatoes
463:the first time
350:in the article
287:
215:
152:
143:
108:
92:
89:
72:
56:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
838:
836:
827:
826:
806:
805:
785:
764:
763:
762:
761:
751:86.120.254.110
729:
728:
727:
717:86.120.254.110
687:
686:
685:
675:86.120.254.110
621:
620:
619:
618:
608:86.120.254.110
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
574:86.120.254.110
554:
541:86.120.254.110
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
510:86.120.254.110
474:86.120.254.110
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
435:86.120.254.110
419:86.120.254.110
415:86.120.250.221
411:88.237.199.171
397:86.120.254.110
381:single purpose
356:86.120.254.110
337:
336:
326:86.120.254.110
311:86.120.254.110
276:
275:
212:
149:
88:
87:
86:
81:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
837:
825:
823:
819:
814:
808:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
786:
783:
779:
775:
771:
766:
765:
760:
756:
752:
747:
746:
745:
741:
737:
736:GeoffreyT2000
733:
730:
726:
722:
718:
713:
709:
706:According to
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:Dread Central
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
623:
622:
617:
613:
609:
605:
604:
603:
598:
594:
591:
590:
583:
579:
575:
570:
569:
568:
563:
559:
555:
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
537:
533:
529:
525:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:
501:
496:
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
470:
466:
462:
458:
444:
440:
436:
431:
430:
429:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
393:
392:
391:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
307:
303:
302:
297:
291:
284:
282:
271:
267:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
243:
240:
237:
234:
231:
228:
225:
221:
218:
217:Find sources:
213:
208:
204:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
158:
155:
154:Find sources:
150:
146:
142:
139:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
80:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
60:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
812:
809:
731:
689:
624:
592:
465:Adrian Țofei
461:Juliancolton
456:
455:
339:
338:
305:
304:
285:
277:
265:
259:
251:
244:
238:
232:
226:
216:
202:
196:
188:
181:
175:
169:
163:
153:
140:
94:Adrian Țofei
69:Adrian Țofei
54:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
242:free images
179:free images
597:Biruitorul
562:Biruitorul
528:Biruitorul
495:Biruitorul
423:Biruitorul
385:Biruitorul
344:Biruitorul
296:Biruitorul
818:talk page
794:• Gene93k
774:• Gene93k
712:imperfect
667:Blumhouse
37:talk page
820:or in a
606:Agreed.
457:Comment.
373:WP:UNDUE
340:Comment.
286:Pinging
138:View log
39:or in a
593:Comment
248:WP refs
236:scholar
185:WP refs
173:scholar
111:protect
106:history
57:Hut 8.5
732:Delete
690:Delete
625:Delete
281:WP:BIO
220:Google
157:Google
115:delete
50:Delete
657:by a
534:from
306:Keep.
263:JSTOR
224:books
200:JSTOR
161:books
145:Stats
132:views
124:watch
120:links
16:<
798:talk
778:talk
755:talk
740:talk
721:talk
698:talk
679:talk
665:and
649:and
637:talk
629:WP:N
612:talk
578:talk
545:talk
514:talk
493:. -
478:talk
439:talk
401:talk
375:and
360:talk
330:talk
315:talk
256:FENS
230:news
193:FENS
167:news
128:logs
102:talk
98:edit
417:or
270:TWL
207:TWL
136:– (
800:)
792:.
780:)
772:.
757:)
742:)
723:)
700:)
681:)
673:.
639:)
614:)
580:)
547:)
516:)
480:)
441:)
413:,
403:)
362:)
332:)
317:)
283:.
250:)
187:)
130:|
126:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
796:(
776:(
753:(
738:(
719:(
696:(
677:(
635:(
610:(
576:(
543:(
512:(
476:(
437:(
399:(
358:(
328:(
313:(
292::
288:@
274:)
266:·
260:·
252:·
245:·
239:·
233:·
227:·
222:(
214:(
211:)
203:·
197:·
189:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
159:(
151:(
148:)
141:·
134:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.