375:
to being the owner of the publishing house that puts these books out. The publisher has littered
Knowledge with very poorly written articles designed to promote the non-notable writers she publishes. So much for background. On the merits: I agree with much of what DGG has said. A hopeless case
346:
a hopelessly promotional article. If she is notable as an author, which is possible but I think unlikely, the best course would be to delete this and start over. I've refrained from removing the worst of it, so people can see just how bad it is. The Reno article is a straight PR piece, letting her
347:
say whatever she wanted about herself with no apparent editorial control, and therefore not a RS. Iassume the other Reno article was essentially the same. If there were not the extensive preliminary record, I would have cut this short with a G11, but we do not need another deletion review.
324:
224:, most participants were of the opinion that it should be the subject of a full deletion discussion instead. The DRV discussion contains links that may be of relevance. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral.
189:
87:
82:
244:
142:
220:
A psychotherapist and author. Recently AfDed for notability concerns, the article was apparently speedily deleted as a recreated deleted page. In the ensuing discussion at
183:
264:
77:
149:
221:
316:
115:
110:
119:
397:
358:
336:
311:
276:
256:
236:
60:
102:
17:
204:
296:
292:
171:
416:
40:
165:
307:
161:
288:
106:
412:
36:
367:
295:. The PBS show is significant as not many people get their own show "aired on PBS stations nationwide"
211:
320:
98:
66:
303:
197:
298:. But there's a notable absence of in-depth independent sources, which is the requirement per
272:
252:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
411:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
393:
381:
377:
177:
331:
370:
227:
354:
299:
385:
268:
248:
54:
136:
389:
327:, though I don't have access, so I can't offer any opinion on it's signficance.
328:
349:
373:
405:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
245:
list of
Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
132:
128:
124:
196:
88:
Articles for deletion/Adrianne Ahern (3rd nomination)
83:
Articles for deletion/Adrianne Ahern (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:). No further edits should be made to this page.
222:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2012 October 22
210:
8:
319:was dug up in the DRV, which comes from the
265:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
263:Note: This debate has been included in the
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
262:
242:
75:
7:
78:Articles for deletion/Adrianne Ahern
369:is the same person who built it up
73:
372:and who admitted on her talk page
24:
287:Found only two reliable sources:
366:The blocked user who created it
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
323:, and looks plausibly good.
302:. Am I missing something? --
61:00:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
398:23:54, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
359:19:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
337:09:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
312:17:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
277:19:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
257:19:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
237:20:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
436:
408:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
72:AfDs for this article:
293:SF Examiner interview
321:Reno Gazette-Journal
289:90-minute PBS show
48:The result was
279:
259:
235:
427:
410:
334:
234:
232:
225:
215:
214:
200:
152:
140:
122:
57:
34:
435:
434:
430:
429:
428:
426:
425:
424:
423:
417:deletion review
406:
332:
228:
226:
157:
148:
113:
97:
94:
92:
70:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
433:
431:
422:
421:
401:
400:
361:
341:
340:
339:
304:Green Cardamom
281:
280:
260:
218:
217:
154:
99:Adrianne Ahern
93:
91:
90:
85:
80:
74:
71:
69:
67:Adrianne Ahern
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
432:
420:
418:
414:
409:
403:
402:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
360:
356:
352:
351:
345:
342:
338:
335:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
290:
286:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
241:
240:
239:
238:
233:
231:
223:
213:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:Find sources:
155:
151:
147:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
407:
404:
363:
348:
343:
284:
229:
219:
207:
201:
193:
186:
180:
174:
168:
158:
145:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
325:As was this
184:free images
230:Sandstein
413:talk page
382:WP:AUTHOR
380:. Fails
378:WP:ADVERT
269:• Gene93k
249:• Gene93k
37:talk page
415:or in a
143:View log
39:or in a
364:Delete.
285:Comment
190:WP refs
178:scholar
116:protect
111:history
56:MBisanz
390:Qworty
344:Delete
300:WP:GNG
162:Google
120:delete
50:delete
386:WP:BK
355:talk
205:JSTOR
166:books
150:Stats
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
394:talk
384:and
329:Wily
317:This
308:talk
291:and
273:talk
253:talk
198:FENS
172:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
376:of
350:DGG
212:TWL
141:– (
396:)
388:.
357:)
310:)
275:)
267:.
255:)
247:.
192:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
52:.
392:(
353:(
333:D
306:(
271:(
251:(
216:)
208:·
202:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
164:(
156:(
153:)
146:·
139:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.