210:, does not mention "endarkenment" so who knows what that was for) and about that. However, it was subsequently expanded and a load of other random, even contradictory, uses of the neologism "endarkenment" were thrown in, making it an absurd mess. I've just stripped out the unreferenced and irrelevant stuff, and copyedited it down to just two paragraphs. In doing so I did a pile of searching, and there are undoubtedly plenty of people using "endarkenment" or "the Endarkenment" (random examples in addition to the article sources:
287:-- The whole thing has the feel of a Neologism and an ill-defined one at that. It is certainly true that post-modernism is at times a flight from the rationality that was the basis of the enlightenment and scientific advance. I also resent the assertion that creationism is an aspect of that. Science is not qualified even to ask the question as to whether or not there is (or was) a creator. I accept that some creationists are probably anti-scientific.
163:
157:
116:
264:
202:
in the course of expressing a disagreement with the rise of rationality over religion (or some such; that's the impression I've got in looking for sources).
219:), they're all idiosyncratic. Some of them are similar in intent, but they don't all refer to a specific thing that should have an encyclopedia article. —
246:
per Scott. An article about a phrase that has been used occasionally to describe several entirely different things doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia.
207:
89:
84:
123:
93:
76:
247:
211:
178:
217:
145:
17:
272:
139:
296:
276:
255:
237:
58:
315:
40:
135:
195:
80:
251:
292:
185:
268:
72:
64:
311:
36:
194:
There is no such specific thing as "the Age of
Endarkenment" - it's just an easy play on the name of
56:
171:
288:
151:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
310:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
230:
53:
199:
110:
220:
214:
206:, this article was largely unreferenced (the one referenced work,
304:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
203:
106:
102:
98:
170:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
318:). No further edits should be made to this page.
198:. It's been used by Christian authors such as
184:
8:
265:list of History-related deletion discussions
263:Note: This debate has been included in the
262:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
335:
307:Please do not modify it.
297:10:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
277:01:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
256:17:38, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
238:16:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
196:the Age of Enlightenment
59:00:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
204:As originally created
73:Age of Endarkenment
65:Age of Endarkenment
279:
269:Shawn in Montreal
326:
309:
234:
229:
224:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
334:
333:
329:
328:
327:
325:
324:
323:
322:
316:deletion review
305:
232:
227:
222:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
332:
330:
321:
320:
300:
299:
281:
280:
259:
258:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
331:
319:
317:
313:
308:
302:
301:
298:
294:
290:
289:Peterkingiron
286:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
260:
257:
253:
249:
248:31.49.219.125
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
236:
235:
226:
225:
218:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
306:
303:
284:
243:
231:
221:
200:Edward Feser
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
158:free images
54:joe decker
312:talk page
208:this book
37:talk page
314:or in a
117:View log
39:or in a
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
285:Delete
244:Delete
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
223:Scott
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
293:talk
273:talk
252:talk
233:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
186:TWL
115:– (
52:.
295:)
275:)
267:.
254:)
216:,
213:,
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
291:(
271:(
250:(
228:•
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.