398:
353:
is obviously not independent. It is of course difficult to conduct a good search for a reporter because it will throw up lots of stuff by the reporter. But still, I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources out there, just the very occasional piece in
160:
264:
115:
376:. But by the same token, I'm not confident enough to say the article should be deleted as there obviously is reliable material out there. The open question is whether it's
154:
238:
405:. Yes... the article is in need of work. And the unsuitable cites currently in the article can be replaced through regular editing with the numerous non-
358:. It is important to uphold the standard of significant coverage in reliable sources, otherwise we have unverified material. All the more so for a BLP. --
120:
194:, a newscaster relatively new to the field, with no significant awards, no national coverage, no significant coverage in secondary sources. --
88:
83:
92:
17:
75:
372:. Most of the articles on the talk page seem to be hidden behind a paywall so I'm not sure whether they'll get the subject across
175:
416:
and properly source this article, and to encourage futher searches, I believe it can be improved to better serve the project.
142:
459:
36:
346:
136:
425:
298:
222:
458:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
442:
428:
389:
329:
301:
279:
253:
225:
203:
57:
132:
438:
409:
402:
385:
363:
355:
182:
79:
418:
291:
215:
168:
312:
325:
275:
249:
213:
Your delete vote is inherent in your nomination, unless specifically stated otherwise by you.
148:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
341:. No significant coverage in reliable sources. There are three sources cited by the article:
434:
381:
359:
199:
71:
63:
373:
350:
413:
321:
271:
245:
49:
109:
195:
342:
289:
for weak notability. Article needs additional cleanup and sourcing.
315:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
452:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
433:
Cheers - I'll revisit my delete; it'll just take some time. --
406:
349:, well, no, classmates.com is not a reliable source; and
105:
101:
97:
167:
320:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
181:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
462:). No further edits should be made to this page.
397:Struck my "weak" above and upped my support per
265:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
239:list of People-related deletion discussions
259:
233:
263:: This debate has been included in the
237:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
401:and the possibilitoes shared now at
345:certainly does not appear reliable;
24:
1:
366:) 22:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
479:
302:04:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
280:20:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
254:20:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
226:04:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
204:18:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
443:04:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
429:03:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
390:06:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
330:22:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
58:19:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
455:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
403:Talk:Ainsley Earhardt
44:The result was
410:sources available
399:a bit of research
332:
282:
268:
256:
242:
470:
457:
421:
319:
317:
294:
269:
243:
218:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
72:Ainsley Earhardt
64:Ainsley Earhardt
34:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
466:
460:deletion review
453:
419:
310:
292:
216:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
474:
465:
464:
448:
447:
446:
445:
392:
334:
333:
318:
307:
306:
305:
283:
257:
230:
229:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
463:
461:
456:
450:
449:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
427:
426:
423:
422:
415:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
365:
361:
357:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
316:
314:
309:
308:
304:
303:
300:
299:
296:
295:
288:
284:
281:
277:
273:
266:
262:
258:
255:
251:
247:
240:
236:
232:
231:
228:
227:
224:
223:
220:
219:
212:
211:To nominator:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
454:
451:
424:
417:
394:
380:coverage. --
377:
369:
338:
337:
311:
297:
290:
286:
285:
260:
234:
221:
214:
210:
209:
191:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
435:Mkativerata
382:Mkativerata
360:Mkativerata
356:local press
155:free images
378:signficant
287:Weak keep
272:• Gene93k
246:• Gene93k
420:Schmidt,
368:Move to
313:Relisted
293:Schmidt,
217:Schmidt,
116:View log
370:neutral
322:Shimeru
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
50:Shimeru
374:WP:GNG
339:Delete
196:Bejnar
192:Delete
133:Google
93:delete
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
439:talk
414:WP:V
395:Keep
386:talk
364:talk
326:talk
276:talk
261:Note
250:talk
235:Note
200:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
412:to
407:FOX
270:--
244:--
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
441:)
388:)
328:)
278:)
267:.
252:)
241:.
202:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
437:(
384:(
362:(
351:3
347:2
343:1
324:(
274:(
248:(
198:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.