769:
if for no other reason than the plural of
Aircraft is Aircraft. An article like that would be almost impossible to keep up sensibly. Far better to take out a subscription to flight. Apart from that whetther an aircraft is in production or not is not relevent to an encyclopedia. Also the author is not
516:
That's a workable option. Another problem with this article, as noted, is its scope: It says "aircraft", but covers only airliners over 100 seats or so - there are many below that. So, do we need subcategories such as civil, military, airlienrs, etc, or is one basic categoy OK? Fibally, it's always a
601:
for discussion before implementing it as we have many, many categories already (but there is room for more), please do not create it without discussion. Links to company websites are valid and in most cases give the most up to date information (but not necessarily the most accurate or unbiased!!).
450:
What is the 're-add' option? I am guessing that
English is not your first language, apologies if I am wrong. If you intend to create an article that lists all aircraft types that are currently in production then the list entry would run to a hundred or more at a wild guess. It would be virtually
521:
is one such place,a dn we regularly discuss creating new article, if they are needed, or how else to apprach the need for that topic to be covered. AFDs are no fun to go through, eseciually if it's your first article, but discussion beforehand can help avoid that pain. -
455:
with trying to update the aircraft type articles already (mainly lack of reliable or timely information). Production status information is almost always provided at aircraft type articles, if a little out of date or inaccurate due to fast moving changes.
285:, although this status does change from week to week. If this article is kept it needs to be moved as there is no such word as "Aircrafts" in the English language. The plural of "aircraft" is "aircraft", just like the plural of "moose" is "moose". -
684:
provides no value as written, would be a very long and un-managable list with potentionaly hundreds of entries if populated. Support the idea of some sort of category but the details of that need to be discussed at the aircraft project not here.
155:
729:
is very, very long and does not tell which aircraft are in production and which not. List of aircraft currently in production would be much shorter. Currently the content isn't good, but it can be improved and expanded.
597:(Edit conflict) To create a category is the same as creating an article but it can be deleted in the same way, this article would not be renamed to a category, it would just be deleted. My suggestion should be taken to
149:
734:
opposes keeping this because he thinks the article would become too long. Maybe it would, but that's a problem of the future and the article can then be splitted to something like
377:
110:
83:
78:
87:
742:. Also we can keep it shorter (if it's necessary, although I'm not convinved it would be) by not listing every variant of a plane type and instead just list the family, like
548:
I think subcategories would be a good idea. But how would someone go about changing the name of the article? Also are links to the company's websites valid for a citation? -
70:
186:
Article has no text explaining its scope and appears to be non-notable. For civil and military aircraft, the list is very incomplete. Info probably better covered at
115:
403:
429:
Well of course old aircraft not in production would be taken off! I think that because it should be aircraft not "Aircrafts." it should be renamed.
281:- Non-notable list. If it is deemed that a list of aircraft currently in production is warranted this would be far better covered by adding text to
170:
137:
739:
304:- Noting that a PROD tag was removed with no edit summary (assumed to mean contested). No idea what this article is supposed to be covering.
259:
771:
563:
I like the "Category:Aircraft currently in production" suggestion also. I don't know of any way to rename the article to a category. -
802:
779:
759:
735:
715:
694:
662:
621:
572:
531:
503:
471:
442:
418:
392:
367:
348:
319:
294:
271:
247:
221:
203:
52:
131:
793:. This data is better suited split and placed into the articles about each company. It is more likely to be maintained there. -
481:
17:
127:
74:
485:
177:
557:
517:
good idea for someone to get input form like-minded editors before creating a new article, especially for a new editor.
438:
243:
66:
58:
798:
817:
36:
816:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
775:
709:
143:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
790:
363:
187:
794:
690:
343:
231:
705:
610:
492:
460:
308:
163:
755:
598:
568:
549:
430:
267:
235:
199:
414:
388:
359:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
731:
726:
686:
553:
527:
434:
330:
282:
239:
217:
191:
658:
290:
49:
484:
or similar to my knowledge. I think that would be useful. Begs the question do we need a
607:
489:
457:
305:
751:
564:
518:
452:
263:
227:
The list of civil aircrafts does not specify aircrafts still in production. -58snow
195:
603:
410:
384:
262:, since Bombardier generally makes smaller civil aircraft than Boeing and Airbus. -
104:
523:
213:
488:, probably not but we do have many defunct company categories. Just a thought.
654:
451:
impossible to keep it accurate and up to date, we have enough problems in the
286:
653:- I would support creating a category in place of this list article. -
358:
If they stop producing a plane it would have to be taken off the list.
791:
wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed
743:
810:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
704:, support the category proposal as being discussed at WT:AIR. -
480:
As I always look for a positive solution at AfD we don't have a
258:
Per comments above. Also, article seems fairly similar to
770:
very friendly as he hasn't even opened a user page!!!!!!!
746:. Potential length is not really a reason to oppose the
740:
List of turboprop passenger planes currently production
100:
96:
92:
162:
378:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
820:). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:List of passenger jets currently in production
176:
8:
404:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
398:
372:
482:Category:Aircraft currently in production
402:: This debate has been included in the
376:: This debate has been included in the
725:. I think this article is a good idea.
260:Competition between Airbus and Boeing
7:
486:Category:Aircraft not in production
24:
560:) 21:51, 15 September 2010 (EST)
67:Aircrafts currently in production
59:Aircrafts currently in production
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
803:02:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
780:13:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
760:09:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
716:03:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
695:07:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
663:15:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
622:01:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
573:01:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
532:00:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
504:00:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
472:00:25, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
443:21:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
419:23:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
393:23:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
368:22:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
349:21:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
320:21:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
295:21:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
272:21:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
248:21:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
222:21:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
204:21:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
53:21:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
837:
813:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
188:List of civil aircraft
789:per the policy that
606:, that might help.
44:The result was
714:
421:
407:
395:
381:
251:
234:comment added by
828:
815:
732:User:MilborneOne
727:List of aircraft
713:
619:
618:
617:
501:
500:
499:
469:
468:
467:
453:aircraft project
408:
382:
346:
340:
335:
317:
316:
315:
283:List of aircraft
250:
228:
192:List of aircraft
181:
180:
166:
118:
108:
90:
34:
836:
835:
831:
830:
829:
827:
826:
825:
824:
818:deletion review
811:
712:
615:
613:
611:
497:
495:
493:
465:
463:
461:
344:
336:
331:
313:
311:
309:
229:
123:
114:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
834:
832:
823:
822:
806:
805:
783:
782:
772:188.65.178.160
763:
762:
750:of this list.
719:
718:
708:
706:The Bushranger
698:
697:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
509:
508:
507:
506:
475:
474:
447:
446:
427:Keep or Re-Add
423:
422:
396:
370:
352:
351:
323:
322:
298:
297:
275:
274:
225:
224:
184:
183:
120:
116:AfD statistics
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
833:
821:
819:
814:
808:
807:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
785:
784:
781:
777:
773:
768:
765:
764:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
728:
724:
721:
720:
717:
711:
707:
703:
700:
699:
696:
692:
688:
683:
680:
679:
664:
660:
656:
652:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
623:
620:
609:
605:
600:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
574:
570:
566:
562:
561:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
533:
529:
525:
520:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
505:
502:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
476:
473:
470:
459:
454:
449:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
405:
401:
397:
394:
390:
386:
379:
375:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
353:
350:
347:
341:
339:
334:
328:
325:
324:
321:
318:
307:
303:
300:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
253:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
223:
219:
215:
212:- Per nom. -
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
117:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
812:
809:
795:¢Spender1983
786:
766:
747:
722:
701:
681:
650:
426:
399:
373:
360:Jaque Hammer
355:
337:
332:
326:
301:
278:
255:
226:
209:
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
710:Return fire
687:MilborneOne
329:- Per nom.
230:—Preceding
150:free images
616:floats by)
498:floats by)
466:floats by)
314:floats by)
50:Courcelles
612:(Cumulus
494:(Cumulus
462:(Cumulus
411:• Gene93k
385:• Gene93k
310:(Cumulus
752:Offliner
748:creation
565:fnlayson
558:contribs
439:contribs
264:fnlayson
244:contribs
232:unsigned
196:fnlayson
111:View log
651:Comment
614:nimbus
496:nimbus
464:nimbus
312:nimbus
190:and/or
156:WPÂ refs
144:scholar
84:protect
79:history
787:Delete
767:Delete
744:Tu-204
702:Delete
682:Delete
608:Nimbus
599:WT:AIR
550:58snow
524:BilCat
519:WP:AIR
490:Nimbus
458:Nimbus
431:58snow
356:Delete
338:mosler
327:Delete
306:Nimbus
302:Delete
279:Delete
256:Delete
236:58snow
214:BilCat
210:Delete
128:Google
88:delete
46:delete
655:Ahunt
604:WP:RS
445:</
287:Ahunt
194:. -
171:JSTOR
132:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
799:talk
776:talk
756:talk
738:and
723:Keep
691:talk
659:talk
602:See
569:talk
554:talk
528:talk
435:talk
415:talk
400:Note
389:talk
374:Note
364:talk
291:talk
268:talk
240:talk
218:talk
200:talk
164:FENS
138:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
409:--
383:--
178:TWL
113:•
109:– (
801:)
778:)
758:)
693:)
661:)
571:)
556:•
530:)
441:)
437:•
417:)
406:.
391:)
380:.
366:)
293:)
270:)
246:)
242:•
220:)
202:)
158:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
797:(
774:(
754:(
689:(
657:(
567:(
552:(
526:(
433:(
413:(
387:(
362:(
345:â—Ź
342:|
333:R
289:(
266:(
238:(
216:(
198:(
182:)
174:·
168:·
160:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
130:(
122:(
119:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.