Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Akrom Yo‘ldoshev - Knowledge

Source 📝

245:. A brief search with Google and Google Books shows multiple reliable sources that name Yo‘ldoshev as the creator of Akromiya, including scholarly research published in an established journal. Being the eponymous founder of a notable religious organization would seem to me to meet the criterion of "has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". The article doesn't make any contentious statements that aren't attributed, and appears to be NPOV. (However, the paragraph referring to his wife should probably be removed.) Per 577:, "Biographical material about a living individual that is not compliant with this policy should be improved and rectified; if this is not possible, then it should be removed." Since it is clearly possible to improve this article, there is no BLP justification for deleting the article. There's a BLP report purportedly from a relative of the subject, but not from the subject themselves, essentially claiming that the sources Phil linked to above have all incorrectly linked the subject with the group 717: 778:
details the article falsely accuses my dad in a crimes that he has never done. I want you to take this article off of the wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.87.216 (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2011 (UTC)" I believe that the article now addresses those concerns and also shows his notability.
511:
You still don't seem to be getting the point. My first post links to several searches. The ones that you can get to by clicking on the words "news, "books" and "scholar" find many reliable sources in the first few entries found. You can read those sources just as easily by following the links that I
795:
as nominator (slightly contradictory I know). Cullen328's edits address the reasons for my nomination adequately. The son of the individual (or anyone else) may still wish to raise BLP concerns with the article in its revised condition, but that can be resolved through ordinary editing. It's also
488:
Excuse me Phil, your post wasn't there when I began posting so I missed that, my reply was actually in response to Macwhiz's comment. I will have a little look at that, I appreciate you linking internally to our articles but that is valueless in assessing this issue, we have lots of articles but
749:
Although I disagree with you, Off2riorob, about that "duty" which appears nowhere in Knowledge policy or guidelines, I have expanded the article, and added three sources. I selected the material and references to try to begin to present both sides of the story. I am sure that other editors can
777:
I've also added an external link to a website with lots of objective information about this person. THe comment on the BLP noticeboard said, "I am the son of the person who is being regarded in this article. I found the article too brief to give the right idea about my dad. Because it lacks in
734:
I just think anyone supporting to keep an article also has a duty of care to bring that article up to scratch, I have seen articles kept and citations posted on the talkpage by someone and others support and yet the article remains the same, personally I would never vote keep to a sub standard
417:
I still don't see any degree on independent note worthy of a BLP, can some of these reliable citations be presented here? or even better added to the article? I also don't see that wp:anybio applies either, and comments such as there are millions of google reports are valueless without article
521: 519: 523: 193:
source provided, this individual wrote a political/religious pamphlet, and was later jailed for alleged involvement in some terrorist attacks. This is very dubious as far as notability is concerned. A person identifying themself as the son of the subject of the article has posted at
158: 372: 581:. That's not exactly persuasive grounds for a BLP deletion. The article is otherwise neutral and factual, if in need of some rescue. Deleting it would serve no purpose; improving it is the way to go here. // 224:
and close this but then I read that his wife denies he has anything to do with this group but he is cited as founder in another cite he is cited as leader, what about speedily redirecting it?
796:
difficult to question the subject's notability in the light of the links provided above. In the absence of any Delete !votes, and with my nomination withdrawn, this might as well be closed. --
716:
is an obligation on the nominator, Off2riorob, not those who recommend keeping an article. I expand many articles I discover at AfD, but am not obligated to do so. Take a look at this book,
614:, I also note that from what I read, the subject of the article is apparently currently imprisoned and attempting to get himself released and denying all involvement with founding this group. 470:(also in the top ten results)? Why should I have to list here what you can easily see for yourself by simply clicking on the Google News, Books and Scholar links that I have provided? 678:
per the sources Phil Bridger mentioned, plus a search under the common transliteration of his name to English, "Akram Yuldashev", which shows widespread coverage in reliable sources.
512:
have already provided as you could if I copied them here, but as you seem unwilling to spend the extra second or two to do that then these are the specific sources that I referred to
152: 422:
and specifically address and discuss the subject in detail. He appears a very minor figure it the truth of things, even the group appears of little true independent notability.
493:
would you either add it to the BLP or actually present the actual source here for evaluation and consideration. Do you intend to add any citation or content to the article?
366: 267: 119: 541:
I am not here to search your point Phil, add it to the article, that will impress me. I am not easily impressed by such things as google search results, show me a
313: 290: 92: 87: 96: 79: 173: 140: 559:
I've shown you six sources, and linked to searches that find many more. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.
17: 387: 545:
that focuses on discussing the life story of this living person or two or three of them, even better add them to the article
354: 134: 525:. They are only a small selection of the reliable sources that you can see by looking further down those search results. 805: 787: 759: 744: 729: 707: 687: 670: 650: 623: 590: 568: 554: 534: 502: 479: 431: 408: 328: 305: 282: 258: 233: 211: 198:
stating that the article lacks sufficient detail to give a reasonable account of this living person's life and actions.
61: 513: 339:. Most English-language sources seem to refer to the subject by the transliteration of the Russian form of his name: 130: 611: 83: 820: 467: 348: 36: 200:
In addition, the article has remained in this stub state for several years now, without significant improvement.
180: 819:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
344: 801: 564: 530: 475: 404: 207: 646: 394: 75: 67: 458:(all in the first ten news results that I linked) not independent and reliable? Or books published by 146: 740: 703: 666: 619: 550: 498: 427: 229: 783: 755: 725: 683: 463: 442: 380: 166: 448: 579:
named after him because he founded it and then published a book describing the group's manifesto
797: 586: 560: 526: 471: 400: 324: 301: 278: 254: 203: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
360: 713: 642: 633: 574: 246: 242: 54: 736: 699: 662: 615: 546: 494: 423: 225: 489:
this is a deletion discussion about this article. If you assert you have found something
779: 751: 721: 698:
Do you have any intention of improving the article? It currently has a single citation.
679: 195: 515: 454: 249:, "Page deletion is normally a last resort" and it's not called for in this case. // 582: 542: 490: 459: 419: 320: 297: 274: 250: 113: 49: 636:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
418:
improvement or actual presentation in the AFD of some of them that meet our
517: 221: 220:- I was just going to boldly redirect it the group associated to him 813:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
718:
Islam after communism:religion and politics in Central Asia
109: 105: 101: 379: 165: 641:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 823:). No further edits should be made to this page. 268:list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions 393: 179: 8: 312:Note: This debate has been included in the 289:Note: This debate has been included in the 266:Note: This debate has been included in the 314:list of People-related deletion discussions 311: 291:list of Islam-related deletion discussions 288: 265: 750:improve on my preliminary efforts here. 720:which discusses this person in depth. 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 661:- to the group he founded. 840: 806:03:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 788:15:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 760:02:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 745:00:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 730:00:37, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 708:00:33, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 688:00:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 671:00:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 651:00:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 624:18:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 591:21:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 569:20:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 555:19:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 535:19:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 503:19:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 480:18:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 432:18:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 409:18:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 329:01:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 306:01:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 283:01:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 259:01:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 234:23:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 212:22:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 62:14:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 468:Columbia University Press 816:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 612:link to the BLPN report 464:Taylor & Francis 443:The Washington Post 449:The New York Times 44:The result was 712:Please note that 653: 331: 317: 308: 294: 285: 271: 189:According to the 58: 831: 818: 640: 638: 398: 397: 383: 318: 295: 272: 184: 183: 169: 117: 99: 76:Akrom Yo‘ldoshev 68:Akrom Yo‘ldoshev 59: 56: 52: 34: 839: 838: 834: 833: 832: 830: 829: 828: 827: 821:deletion review 814: 631: 340: 126: 90: 74: 71: 55: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 837: 835: 826: 825: 809: 808: 790: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 732: 691: 690: 673: 655: 654: 639: 628: 627: 626: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 571: 538: 537: 506: 505: 483: 482: 435: 434: 412: 411: 333: 332: 309: 286: 262: 261: 236: 187: 186: 123: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 836: 824: 822: 817: 811: 810: 807: 803: 799: 794: 791: 789: 785: 781: 776: 773: 772: 761: 757: 753: 748: 747: 746: 742: 738: 733: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 689: 685: 681: 677: 674: 672: 668: 664: 660: 657: 656: 652: 648: 644: 637: 635: 630: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 606: 605: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 539: 536: 532: 528: 524: 522: 520: 518: 516: 514: 510: 509: 508: 507: 504: 500: 496: 492: 487: 486: 485: 484: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 456: 455:New Statesman 451: 450: 445: 444: 439: 438: 437: 436: 433: 429: 425: 421: 416: 415: 414: 413: 410: 406: 402: 396: 392: 389: 386: 382: 378: 374: 371: 368: 365: 362: 359: 356: 353: 350: 346: 343: 342:Find sources: 338: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 315: 310: 307: 303: 299: 292: 287: 284: 280: 276: 269: 264: 263: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 237: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 215: 214: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 192: 182: 178: 175: 172: 168: 164: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 132: 129: 128:Find sources: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 60: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 815: 812: 798:Demiurge1000 792: 774: 675: 658: 632: 610:- here is a 607: 578: 561:Phil Bridger 527:Phil Bridger 472:Phil Bridger 460:M. E. Sharpe 453: 447: 441: 401:Phil Bridger 390: 384: 376: 369: 363: 357: 351: 341: 336: 238: 217: 204:Demiurge1000 199: 190: 188: 176: 170: 162: 155: 149: 143: 137: 127: 45: 43: 31: 28: 643:Ron Ritzman 367:free images 153:free images 737:Off2riorob 700:Off2riorob 663:Off2riorob 616:Off2riorob 547:Off2riorob 495:Off2riorob 424:Off2riorob 226:Off2riorob 780:Cullen328 752:Cullen328 735:article. 722:Cullen328 714:WP:BEFORE 680:Cullen328 575:WP:BLPDEL 321:• Gene93k 298:• Gene93k 275:• Gene93k 247:WP:BLPDEL 243:WP:ANYBIO 659:redirect 634:Relisted 583:⌘macwhiz 573:Quoting 452:and the 251:⌘macwhiz 222:Akromiya 120:View log 775:Comment 373:WP refs 361:scholar 337:Comment 218:comment 196:WP:BLPN 159:WP refs 147:scholar 93:protect 88:history 345:Google 131:Google 97:delete 543:WP:RS 491:WP:RS 420:WP:RS 388:JSTOR 349:books 174:JSTOR 135:books 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 802:talk 793:Keep 784:talk 756:talk 741:talk 726:talk 704:talk 684:talk 676:Keep 667:talk 647:talk 620:talk 608:note 587:talk 565:talk 551:talk 531:talk 499:talk 476:talk 466:and 440:Are 428:talk 405:talk 381:FENS 355:news 325:talk 302:talk 279:talk 255:talk 241:per 239:Keep 230:talk 208:talk 167:FENS 141:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 46:keep 395:TWL 319:-- 296:-- 273:-- 191:one 181:TWL 118:– ( 57:Dom 51:Big 804:) 786:) 758:) 743:) 728:) 706:) 686:) 669:) 649:) 622:) 589:) 567:) 553:) 533:) 501:) 478:) 462:, 446:, 430:) 407:) 399:. 375:) 327:) 316:. 304:) 293:. 281:) 270:. 257:) 232:) 210:) 202:-- 161:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 48:. 800:( 782:( 754:( 739:( 724:( 702:( 682:( 665:( 645:( 618:( 585:( 563:( 549:( 529:( 497:( 474:( 426:( 403:( 391:· 385:· 377:· 370:· 364:· 358:· 352:· 347:( 323:( 300:( 277:( 253:( 228:( 206:( 185:) 177:· 171:· 163:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 138:· 133:( 125:( 122:) 116:) 78:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Big
Dom
14:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Akrom Yo‘ldoshev
Akrom Yo‘ldoshev
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:BLPN
Demiurge1000
talk
22:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.