322:
You're thinking too much. The article is not intended as an attack, only a statement of what we know. What you think is newsworthy is your mere opinion. What the media thinks is fact. Due the the media, this individual and the Bush daughters are not obsucre people like the 9/11 victims, and therefore
187:
I'm not voting either to keep or delete, but to answer Adam. The only possible legitimate purpose I can see is as a test of the hypocrisy of the parents. These are people who advocate draconian punishments for using harmless drugs that ruin far more lives than the drugs themselves. If Gore or Bush
314:
Delete both the Gore III and Bush twins articles. I don't see why it's a big deal, or even newsworthy, that Gore's son was arrested for marijuana, and I don't think we should focus on the misdemeanors of Bush's daughters if we want to attack him, we should focus on his incompetence as
President.
236:
Chelsea
Clinton is a public person in her own right and by her own choice. I am not aware that Gore III or the Bush daughters have done anything in their own right. Besides which Chelsea doesn't have any misdemeanors that I am aware of, so an article on her isn't just a vehicle for attacking her
153:
Not that I know of: in fact we have freedom of speech and freedom of information laws stating the exact opposite. Since he appeared in open court, the information is a matter of public record. That said, I make no vote on whether this article should appear, but if not, it should be based on
179:
Well I would delete that article as well. I am opposed to having articles on private citizens whose only source of interest is that they have the misfortune to be related to someone famous, and particularly the children of the famous. This is just voyeurism and serves no legitimate purpose.
201:
The place to say that is under Bush article, as in "Bush advocated the death penalty for littering, but when his daughter was arrested for littering he made excuses for her," (or whatever). It doesn't mean that the daughter deserves an article to catalogue her misdemeanors.
303:? Might you now be trying to generate strife? As for your so-called double standard, the children of a sitting president are more notable than the child of a former vice-president, and there is more material in the Bush article than there ever was in the Gore one.
273:
The classic
Knowledge (XXG) double standard the private life of a child of a former Dem US Vice President one time perhaps future presidential candidate not worthy but of course it worthy for the current US Gop president. This group sure make sense.
284:
I'm not the individual who posted about the double standard, however if you look at page history someone removed all negative content from the Gore child article while similar content is still the focus of the Bush child article.
139:. Three paragraphs about this kid, one about a car accident and two about a marijuana arrest. If this is all we can come up with, then delete. It seems to me like it's more an attempt at smearing his father.
294:
If you don't think this group makes sense, perhaps you should leave it to those of us who think it does. I note you are using the 64.12.97.6 IP address. Might you perhaps be the same person who vandalized
118:
112:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
123:
356:
Keep. AG3 is, for better or worse, a well-known person. His activities (and the Bush daghters', and
Chelsea's) are noteworthy. This is an encyclopedia of facts and events. Let's record them.
229:
Keep. He is historically significant because of the 1992 Dem. Convention, which I added. I changed the article to remove the arrest record, which is of dubious historic importance.
81:
237:
father, as
Mcarling admits he sees the Bush daughters article as being. And what did Gore III do at the 1992 Convention, when he would have been ten years old?
244:
Redirect. It's interesting that his accident affected the
Democratic primaries, but that's more about Al Jr. than Al III. I've merged it into
17:
154:
Knowledge (XXG) deciding he is not worthy of an article, not based on privacy concerns, since what he did was fully public. --
374:
253:
146:
Don't you have privacy laws in the US? Gore 3 is a private citizen and his misdemeanors are not the public's business.
36:
188:
were to advocate the same punishments for their children that they advocate for our children, I would vote to delete.
373:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
169:
336:
64:
316:
267:
but keep as redir. Could become an article if he ever does something meaningful besides smoking pot.
161:
Do we have articles on Bush's daughters who I believe have also been in court on minor charges?
278:
213:. Many wikipedia biographies are on non-government officials. I don't see a reason to delete,
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
286:
173:
60:
327:
221:
210:
56:
268:
238:
203:
181:
162:
147:
357:
343:
300:
296:
189:
155:
304:
257:
230:
136:
70:
350:
324:
218:
140:
49:
264:
249:
245:
132:
From VFD (5 votes to delete, 4 votes to keep, 2 votes to redirect):
367:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
277:
Where do you gather that from (the double standard)?
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
119:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (8th nomination)
113:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (7th nomination)
107:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (6th nomination)
102:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (5th nomination)
97:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (4th nomination)
92:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (3rd nomination)
87:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (2nd nomination)
124:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III and Noelle Bush
377:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
79:
248:and I vote to make this a redirect to
215:but I'm not in full support of keeping
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
77:
323:deserve enclyclopedia articles. --
24:
82:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III
256:deprecates "merge and delete").
349:Delete. I also agree with Adam
1:
65:00:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
394:
335:Delete, agree with Adam.
281:19:24, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
233:09:38, Dec 21, 2003 (UTC)
184:06:45, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
176:06:38, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
165:06:35, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
158:06:19, Dec 21, 2003 (UTC)
143:04:28, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
370:Please do not modify it.
353:18:17, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)
346:18:01, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)
339:16:55, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)
332:21:57, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
319:21:27, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
307:00:26, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
289:21:09, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
263:Move relevant into into
260:16:35, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
241:09:42, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
226:09:30, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
206:09:16, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
192:10:40, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
150:06:07, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
170:Barbara and Jenna Bush
76:AfDs for this article:
209:KEEP. We also have
63:
385:
372:
55:
52:
34:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
381:
375:deletion review
368:
351:BCorr ¤ Брайен
337:Muriel Victoria
254:deletion policy
211:Chelsea Clinton
130:
128:
115:
74:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
380:
379:
363:
362:
361:
360:
354:
347:
340:
333:
320:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
292:
291:
290:
261:
242:
234:
227:
207:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
159:
151:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
109:
104:
99:
94:
89:
84:
78:
75:
73:
68:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
378:
376:
371:
365:
364:
359:
355:
352:
348:
345:
341:
338:
334:
331:
330:
326:
321:
318:
313:
306:
302:
301:Script kiddie
298:
297:Paul Levesque
293:
288:
283:
282:
280:
276:
275:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
235:
232:
228:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
200:
191:
186:
185:
183:
178:
177:
175:
171:
167:
166:
164:
160:
157:
152:
149:
145:
144:
142:
138:
135:
134:
133:
125:
122:
120:
117:
114:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
72:
69:
67:
66:
62:
58:
54:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
369:
366:
328:
279:Evil saltine
222:
214:
131:
48:
46:No consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
317:Mike Church
287:Maximus Rex
252:(note that
174:Maximus Rex
137:Al Gore III
71:Al Gore III
269:—Eloquence
61:count/logs
358:Ensiform
344:Mcarling
190:Mcarling
156:Delirium
265:Al Gore
250:Al Gore
246:Al Gore
168:We do.
342:Keep.
305:Tualha
258:Tualha
231:Davodd
141:RickK
51:Jerry
16:<
299:and
239:Adam
217:. --
204:Adam
182:Adam
163:Adam
148:Adam
57:talk
325:Jia
219:Jia
329:ng
223:ng
172:.
59:¤
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.