281:. It contained a significant amount of unsubstantiated fluff and claims without third party sources. At some point other editors added material about a controversy that the subject was involved in, at this point the COI editor and multiple IPs attempted to remove the controversy section multiple times. It has been protected for periods due to sourced content removal. None of the other claims have had sources added. Having removed the unsubstantiated claims, what is left is borderline for establishing notability i think. I highly doubt the article would exist were it not for the subject being self promotional or other parties attempting to discredit the subject. Today someone one again attempted to remove it all and place a threat for which they have been indefinitely blocked, but I think the community should weigh in on the state of this article which has never really contained a version that satisfies both notability and BLP concerns. A problem is that the controversies surrounding this subject are mostly based in the blogosphere and have not received significant mainstream coverage, nor has any lawsuit been actually been filed, leaving the claims as online allegations.
31:
476:
Per
Cuchullain, this article contains negatively-unsourced information and reads like an attack page. The controversy section is sourced to blogs and other unreliable sources. The IPs were correct in removing the sourced content; the controversy section is devoid of reliable sources and is a blatant
78:. The 2 main sources noted here as proof of notability seem to confer notability on Rosas Farms rather than Al Rosas specifically, as he is not the main subject of either article.. The controversy, as poorly sourced as it is, offers no indication of notability either.
428:
as notability is satisfied per references provided by Whpq. (I created this article but only after deleting a previous version of it as spam - the spamvertisement concern is valid and this article, if kept, will need to be scrubbed to remove COI)
506:- How do the Boston Globe and Ocala articles come off as "passing mentions"? The Boston Globe article is specifically about Al Rosa and his wife and farm. There is no other topic. Ditto for the Ocala article. --
483:
The sources provided by Whpq are both passing mentions that do not establish notability. The other sources in the article are either passing mentions or press releases. This marginally notable individual fails
209:
571:
on the basis of coverage in
Florida Trend (June 1, 2008), Boston Globe (November 2, 2008) and Ocala Star-Banner (October 8, 2007). Those articles, taken together, are definitely sufficient for
411:
desontrate notability. A Google news search has more results with many behind pay walls. COI editting and NPOV adherence need to be addressed but the subject does appear to be notable. --
528:. After looking more closely at the sources, the sources do provide significant information about Rosas. If the controversies section is removed and not re-added, I will be content with a
343:
170:
95:
40:
374:
203:
406:
258:
17:
616:
459:
252:
409:
240:
This article has been a source of controversy, having been extensively edited by the subject or someone closely related as
308:
389:
358:
143:
138:
598:
224:
65:
46:
264:
147:
191:
130:
597:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
270:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
381:
350:
449:
185:
546:
Thanks for looking at the sources again. I agree the current state of the article is deplorable. --
456:
246:
181:
282:
583:
555:
541:
515:
497:
464:
438:
434:
420:
394:
363:
333:
329:
312:
294:
217:
134:
111:
87:
533:
520:
My mistake. I searched for "Al Rosas" in both articles but only found him mentioned twice in the
489:
231:
126:
118:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
537:
493:
290:
485:
478:
321:
453:
241:
107:
83:
551:
511:
430:
416:
325:
572:
197:
610:
576:
304:
164:
286:
103:
79:
547:
507:
412:
591:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
276:
160:
156:
152:
216:
96:
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2009 September 29
344:
list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions
230:
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
601:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
375:list of Florida-related deletion discussions
448:. Without the puffery, it's now largely an
369:
338:
373:: This debate has been included in the
342:: This debate has been included in the
45:For an explanation of the process, see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
41:deletion review on 2009 September 29
24:
29:
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
584:23:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
556:21:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
542:21:44, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
516:21:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
498:21:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
465:20:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
439:06:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
421:20:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
395:20:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
364:20:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
334:23:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
313:18:00, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
295:17:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
285:is also of relevance i think.
94:This result was overturned at
88:07:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
112:00:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
633:
617:Pages at deletion review
594:Please do not modify it.
452:. Which is much worse.--
61:Please do not modify it.
303:Self-promotion, NN.
524:and twice in the
462:
397:
378:
366:
347:
74:The result was
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
624:
596:
460:
392:
388:
384:
379:
361:
357:
353:
348:
280:
259:deleted contribs
235:
234:
220:
168:
150:
63:
33:
32:
26:
632:
631:
627:
626:
625:
623:
622:
621:
607:
606:
605:
599:deletion review
592:
390:
386:
382:
359:
355:
351:
311:
244:
177:
141:
125:
122:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
630:
628:
620:
619:
609:
608:
604:
603:
587:
586:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
468:
467:
442:
441:
423:
399:
398:
367:
336:
315:
307:
238:
237:
174:
121:
116:
115:
114:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
629:
618:
615:
614:
612:
602:
600:
595:
589:
588:
585:
582:
581:
580:
574:
570:
567:
566:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
513:
509:
505:
502:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
480:
477:violation of
475:
474:
470:
469:
466:
463:
457:
455:
451:
447:
444:
443:
440:
436:
432:
427:
424:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
404:
401:
400:
396:
393:
385:
376:
372:
368:
365:
362:
354:
345:
341:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
172:
166:
162:
158:
154:
149:
145:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
120:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
98:. Result now
97:
93:
92:
91:
90:
89:
85:
81:
77:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
593:
590:
578:
577:
568:
529:
525:
522:Boston Globe
521:
503:
482:
472:
471:
445:
425:
402:
370:
339:
317:
300:
273:
267:
261:
255:
249:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
100:No consensus
99:
75:
73:
72:
60:
57:
36:
450:attack page
204:free images
573:notability
454:Cúchullain
283:WP:ONEVENT
271:block user
265:page moves
242:Tsunami812
431:Kimchi.sg
326:South Bay
277:block log
611:Category
305:B.Rossow
253:contribs
171:View log
127:Al Rosas
119:Al Rosas
579:TheFeds
504:Comment
391:Windows
360:Windows
210:WP refs
198:scholar
144:protect
139:history
534:Cunard
490:Cunard
486:WP:BIO
479:WP:BLP
473:Delete
446:Delete
383:Fences
352:Fences
322:WP:BIO
320:: per
318:Delete
301:Delete
287:Mfield
182:Google
148:delete
76:Delete
526:Ocala
387:&
356:&
309:contr
225:JSTOR
186:books
165:views
157:watch
153:links
104:Kevin
80:Kevin
16:<
569:Keep
552:talk
548:Whpq
538:talk
530:keep
512:talk
508:Whpq
494:talk
435:talk
426:Keep
417:talk
413:Whpq
408:and
403:Keep
371:Note
340:Note
330:talk
247:talk
218:FENS
192:news
161:logs
135:talk
131:edit
108:talk
84:talk
380:--
349:--
291:Oi!
232:TWL
169:– (
613::
575:.
554:)
540:)
532:.
514:)
496:)
488:.
437:)
419:)
405:-
377:.
346:.
332:)
293:)
212:)
163:|
159:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
110:)
102:.
86:)
43:.
550:(
536:(
510:(
492:(
481:.
461:c
458:/
433:(
415:(
328:(
324:.
289:(
279:)
274:·
268:·
262:·
256:·
250:·
245:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
167:)
129:(
106:(
82:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.