276:, not merely as a series. In the event of long-standing series that are not commonly recognized rivalry games, relevant content should be merged to the parent team articles (e.g., Alabama Crimson Tide football) or the team-season articles (e.g., 2012 Alabama Crimson Tide football team). This series is not notable as rivalry and there is no article content that is worth preserving that is not already included in other related CFB articles.
178:
333:. Per Dirtlawyer. Although there is some unique history between the two programs with Bryant and Stallings, at least from the Alabama side I can say this is not a "rivalry". Just playing in the same conference does not constitute one either.
77:
172:
104:
99:
108:
351:
91:
252:. First, the Alabama-Texas A&M football series is not rivalry as that term is normally understood. How could it be? It's only been played five times in 70 years. Second, the
131:
138:
193:
160:
52:. OK, this is obviously ridiculous, as everyone recognized. There is no rivalry here. There will be revenge, though, next time we run into those ******s.
154:
269:
433:
383:
363:
342:
325:
310:
285:
244:
218:
61:
150:
200:
426:
17:
166:
95:
293:. There's no indication that this is an actual rivalry, much less a notable one. No sources and no prose, just a single table.--
318:. What Dirtlawyer said. I'm sure it's on as far as Alabama is concerned, but five games in fifty years do not a rivalry make.
87:
67:
260:
because it is not a championship, bowl game or all-star game, nor does it satisfy the general notability guidelines as a
235:
452:
40:
209:
No evidence that these two teams have a rivalry. They played 5 times in the last 50 years, and only once since 1988.
257:
409:
My arbitrary definition of a rivalry would be that it has to have been played at least once every two years.
417:
228:
392:
448:
338:
281:
36:
301:
264:
because the series has not received in-depth coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources per
322:
214:
186:
410:
400:
359:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
447:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
334:
277:
57:
265:
379:
294:
319:
272:
that college football series should not have stand-alone articles unless the series is
210:
396:
355:
125:
53:
375:
441:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
78:
Articles for deletion/Alabama–Texas A&M football rivalry
121:
117:
113:
352:
list of
American football-related deletion discussions
185:
199:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
455:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
350:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject College football
349:
227:no evidence of notability, as per nom.
75:
88:Alabama–Texas A&M football rivalry
68:Alabama–Texas A&M football rivalry
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
403:) 16:58, 14 November 2012 Jhortman
74:
24:
268:. Third, it is the consensus of
256:is not inherently notable per
1:
434:00:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
384:02:37, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
364:01:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
343:13:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
326:13:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
311:08:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
286:05:43, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
245:04:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
219:03:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
62:02:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
472:
395:bias due to 2012 result.
444:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
274:notable as a rivalry
48:The result was
366:
463:
446:
431:
424:
415:
391:, clear case of
374:per Dirtlawyer.
308:
299:
242:
233:
204:
203:
189:
141:
129:
111:
34:
471:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
461:
460:
459:
453:deletion review
442:
427:
418:
411:
302:
295:
236:
229:
146:
137:
102:
86:
83:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
469:
467:
458:
457:
437:
436:
404:
386:
368:
367:
346:
345:
328:
313:
288:
258:WP:SPORTSEVENT
247:
207:
206:
143:
82:
81:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
468:
456:
454:
450:
445:
439:
438:
435:
432:
430:
425:
423:
422:
416:
414:
408:
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
348:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
327:
324:
321:
317:
314:
312:
309:
306:
300:
298:
292:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
246:
243:
241:
240:
234:
232:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
140:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
443:
440:
428:
420:
419:
412:
406:
388:
371:
330:
315:
304:
296:
290:
273:
261:
253:
249:
238:
237:
230:
224:
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
134:
49:
47:
31:
28:
335:Patriarca12
278:Dirtlawyer1
173:free images
297:xanchester
449:talk page
421:Phightins
393:recentism
356:• Gene93k
320:Mackensen
239:Strikeout
231:Automatic
211:GrapedApe
37:talk page
451:or in a
397:Jhortman
132:View log
39:or in a
179:WP refs
167:scholar
105:protect
100:history
407:Delete
389:Delete
372:Delete
331:Delete
323:(talk)
316:Delete
291:Delete
266:WP:GNG
262:series
254:series
250:Delete
225:Delete
151:Google
109:delete
54:Drmies
50:delete
376:Cbl62
194:JSTOR
155:books
139:Stats
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
401:talk
380:talk
360:talk
339:talk
282:talk
215:talk
187:FENS
161:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
58:talk
201:TWL
130:– (
413:Go
382:)
362:)
354:.
341:)
284:)
217:)
181:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
60:)
429:!
399:(
378:(
358:(
337:(
307:)
305:t
303:(
280:(
213:(
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
142:)
135:·
128:)
90:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.