336:
I'm making no judgement call on the copyright issue. I don't doubt that a state agency isn't notable, or that it cannot otherwise be the subject of an encyclopedic article. Most all of the material within the page at the time it was nominated reads like promotion and needs a complete rewrite from an
246:
OTOH, I'm not sure that
Alabama state government documents are protected by copyright, and I note that there is no copyright claimed on the PDF (yes, there is automatic copyright for anything put online, but that's not always the case for taxpayer-funded works, and I don't know what the status of
364:, however, states that "Also, most state and local governments in the United States do not place their work into the public domain and do in fact own the copyright to their work. Please be careful to check copyright information before copying." I agree that
271:
Hey Dori, that's why I put the disclaimer in my note above... The nice thing about those templates is, as far as I understand it, that some of our best geeks will look at it and make that determination
100:
95:
104:
87:
157:
152:
161:
144:
133:
315:
It is a large agency within a US state, easily notable. The copyvio issue is seperate problem. In general, documents published online by the US or state governments are
83:
75:
148:
381:
355:
328:
303:
285:
266:
229:
207:
69:
276:
has been of great assistance to me in these matters). So I propose just letting this thing play out for assessment by the WP copyvio cats.
261:
349:
238:
140:
91:
17:
257:
396:
36:
395:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
344:
361:
216:: Tim, thank you for keeping an eye out for such matters. Besides the speedy template, there's also
195:
294:--the article has nothing of note, which stands to reason, since the department is hardly notable.
273:
253:
377:
339:
203:
65:
324:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
299:
281:
225:
217:
187:
337:
encyclopedic standpoint, but this can be easily stubbified and allowed to expand properly.
191:
53:
49:
249:
237:- I renamed this article at the same time you were creating the AFD—sorry! It's now at
369:
57:
373:
199:
61:
220:, which I just slapped on the article. (I hope I did so correctly and justifiably!)
320:
178:
121:
295:
277:
221:
372:. Mea culpa. I withdraw the nomination and will stubbify the article.
368:
is probably appropriate here and that this agency should easily pass
290:
Which reminds me: if this does not stand as a copyvio, then I vote
389:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
360:
For federal government works, yes, there is no copyright.
188:
http://adph.org/administration/assets/guidetoservices.pdf
174:
170:
166:
128:
117:
113:
109:
241:, and I've changed the above to include that as well.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
399:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
56:as the consensus is that the subject passes
84:Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
76:Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
239:Alabama Department of Public Health
141:Alabama Department of Public Health
24:
1:
419:
52:over one delete !vote per
382:02:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
356:02:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
329:01:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
304:01:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
286:01:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
267:00:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
230:00:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
208:00:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
70:02:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
392:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
194:. Author removed my
46:nomination withdrawn
274:User:Moonriddengirl
186:Blatant copyvio of
50:Non-admin closure
44:The result was
410:
394:
352:
347:
342:
334:Keep and rewrite
265:
218:Template:Copyvio
182:
164:
131:
125:
107:
34:
418:
417:
413:
412:
411:
409:
408:
407:
403:
397:deletion review
390:
350:
345:
340:
248:
155:
139:
127:
98:
82:
79:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
416:
414:
405:
402:
401:
385:
384:
358:
331:
309:
308:
307:
306:
288:
243:
242:
232:
184:
183:
137:
78:
73:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
415:
406:
400:
398:
393:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
357:
354:
353:
348:
343:
335:
332:
330:
326:
322:
319:copyrighted.
318:
314:
311:
310:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
269:
268:
263:
259:
255:
251:
245:
244:
240:
236:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
180:
176:
172:
168:
163:
159:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
135:
130:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
404:
391:
388:
365:
362:WP:COPYRIGHT
338:
333:
316:
312:
291:
234:
213:
185:
45:
43:
31:
28:
247:this is).
196:WP:CSD G12
374:Tim Song
366:stubbify
258:Contribs
200:Tim Song
134:View log
62:Tim Song
321:Fuzbaby
235:Comment
214:Comment
158:protect
153:history
101:protect
96:history
296:Drmies
292:delete
278:Drmies
262:Review
222:Drmies
192:WP:SPA
162:delete
129:delete
105:delete
54:WP:IAR
351:Space
198:tag.
179:views
171:watch
167:links
132:) – (
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
378:talk
370:WP:N
346:From
341:Them
325:talk
313:Keep
300:talk
282:talk
254:Talk
250:Dori
226:talk
204:talk
175:logs
149:talk
145:edit
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
66:talk
58:WP:N
317:not
264:) ❦
252:❦ (
190:by
48:. (
380:)
327:)
302:)
284:)
260:❖
256:❖
228:)
206:)
177:|
173:|
169:|
165:|
160:|
156:|
151:|
147:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
68:)
60:)
376:(
323:(
298:(
280:(
272:(
224:(
202:(
181:)
143:(
136:)
126:(
124:)
86:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.