363:
the ENTIRE article before commenting. The fact that their releases get mentioned in the NY Times (emphasis on what newspaper I'm talking about, this isnt a podunk newspaper from the midwest, this is THE NY TIMES talking about releases from an independent record label from a small city well outside their regional coverage area) and being mentioned even in this one article I have linked is more than enough to save the article so MORE RESEARCH can be done at a person's leisure instead of such a deadline on trying to save it. To save an article it shouldnt be required that the article becomes complete. Its been shown to be notable. We've done our job as required for this AfD.
348:
trivial and you didn't indicate there was more. While that article provides some print, the article isn't about Albany
Records and its only mentioned in relation to a larger issue and there are some quotes from a couple people who work there. Has anyone ever written an article about Albany Record or are they only ever mentioned in relation to a CD release or sound bites on other issues?--
395:
400 years there are lots of sites talking about "records" in or about "Albany"; so yes a search for the words "Albany
Records" like you have done is going to show alot of red herrings and swamp any mentions of the recording company. A search should always be tailored to get you the most correct responses, not the most general.
283:
that mentions "A few -- Albany
Records, GM Recordings, Bridge Records and New World Records -- have staked out a commercially unviable corner of the repertory, contemporary music and particularly American contemporary music, and developed notably adventurous catalogues and telling histories." I think
394:
is them listed on a "scholarly resource of recordings". And yes, when doing searches at the NY Times archives or Google it IS pretty much common sense that you need to put "Albany
Records music" instead of just "Albany Records", since as a US state capital for ~250 years and since it has existed for
362:
Dont know and I have better things to work on right now. It is enough to keep the article however, and I dont have to give more than a snippet when talking, if you want to comment on things like this do your homework, I linked directly to the article and I assumed people reading this would have read
347:
It is a reliable third party source, I asked if it provided significant coverage. If there was far more content in the source, you should have stated that. You linked to a search which basically showed nothing and contained tons of irrelevant results. the quote you provided from the article was
306:
as such. It is a name drop and that doesn't cut it for notability. The search you've linked to is incredibly misleading as you haven't searched with quotes and there are all kinds of results mixed in there that simply mention albany, music and records. Here is a better search
332:
Did you read the ENTIRE NY Times article that I provided? Several quotes from the owner of Albany
Records is in that article, and I wouldnt say its trivial coverage. And since when is the NY Times NOT a reliable third party
278:
quick search of the NY Times archives shows several instances in which music CD's released by Albany
Records gets mentioned in this highly reliable newspaper of immenent importance, and at least one arts section article
155:
110:
280:
284:
this quick little search adds enough notability that it should stay. Being a terrible article in need of work doesnt mean its not notable. Just makes it a crappy article
210:
149:
387:
302:
Are any of those significant coverage by reliable third party sources? What you've listed as your killer source is basically trivial coverage and noted by
115:
83:
78:
17:
87:
247:
70:
413:
based on current sources provided I don't see anything that indicates significant coverage by reliable third party sources.--
170:
137:
308:
275:
258:
of work. Please give me and the WikiProject:Capital
District a few days to attempt to rescue it. If not, then it goes.
475:
36:
456:
243:
49:
254:, but not notable by himself. I'm not sure whether there's notabilty nationally. In any case, this stub needs
131:
474:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
460:
443:
422:
404:
372:
357:
342:
319:
303:
297:
267:
225:
199:
127:
52:
177:
452:
400:
368:
338:
293:
435:
221:
195:
163:
74:
439:
418:
353:
315:
263:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
235:
187:
251:
239:
143:
431:
396:
364:
334:
289:
217:
191:
66:
58:
414:
349:
311:
259:
391:
104:
390:
is a third party website talking about the AMC giving the company an award.
468:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
310:
and I don't see anything in there that isn't trivial coverage.--
100:
96:
92:
162:
176:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
478:). No further edits should be made to this page.
430:The coverage is there in the links provided by
211:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
250:. Peter Kermani is a big socialite here in
186:I can't find significant coverage for this
205:
242:, where I live, and has produced CDs by
209:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
451:per meeting notability guidelines.
24:
248:Saratoga Performing Arts Center
1:
461:07:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
444:02:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
434:. Award-winning label, etc.
423:01:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
405:01:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
373:01:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
358:01:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
343:01:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
320:01:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
298:01:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
268:00:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
226:20:42, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
200:20:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
53:12:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
495:
244:Albany Symphony Orchestra
471:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
246:and live shows at the
44:The result was
236:certainly notable
228:
214:
486:
473:
252:Upstate New York
240:Albany, New York
215:
181:
180:
166:
118:
108:
90:
34:
494:
493:
489:
488:
487:
485:
484:
483:
482:
476:deletion review
469:
453:ChildofMidnight
123:
114:
81:
65:
62:
50:Scott Mac (Doc)
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
492:
490:
481:
480:
464:
463:
446:
425:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
325:
324:
323:
322:
270:
229:
184:
183:
120:
116:AfD statistics
67:Albany Records
61:
59:Albany Records
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
491:
479:
477:
472:
466:
465:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
424:
420:
416:
412:
409:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
393:
389:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:WP:Notability
301:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
282:
277:
274:
271:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
117:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
470:
467:
448:
427:
410:
385:
285:
272:
255:
231:
206:
188:record label
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
150:free images
432:Camelbinky
397:Camelbinky
386:addendum-
365:Camelbinky
335:Camelbinky
290:Camelbinky
232:Weak keep
218:Joe Chill
192:Joe Chill
436:Plvekamp
234:- It is
111:View log
415:Crossmr
350:Crossmr
333:source?
312:Crossmr
286:for now
260:Bearian
156:WP refs
144:scholar
84:protect
79:history
411:delete
128:Google
88:delete
256:a lot
171:JSTOR
132:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
457:talk
449:Keep
440:talk
428:Keep
419:talk
401:talk
392:Here
388:Here
369:talk
354:talk
339:talk
316:talk
294:talk
281:here
276:This
273:Keep
264:talk
222:talk
207:Note
196:talk
164:FENS
138:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
238:in
216:--
178:TWL
113:•
109:– (
459:)
442:)
421:)
403:)
371:)
356:)
341:)
318:)
296:)
266:)
224:)
213:.
198:)
190:.
158:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
455:(
438:(
417:(
399:(
367:(
352:(
337:(
314:(
292:(
288:.
262:(
220:(
194:(
182:)
174:·
168:·
160:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
130:(
122:(
119:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.