Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Albion Smith - Knowledge

Source 📝

249:: MacGyverMagic is correct, though some will disagree. The individual has proven his notability by creating an item worthy of being observed by a mass of people, in this incident, the Museum. A person may try to fly to the Moon, is this notable? If, however, he lands and returns he is notable. Simply put, the pot made him notable. 266:
but the matter is not quite as simple as Royalhistorian says. People who do things of no particular significance, but are noted widely in the tabloid press for the human interest of it, and not notable, by ONEEVENT and NOTNEWS. Producing a work of art worthy of a major museum is of cultural
186:
Good point, although since he's still around, I was perhaps hopeful that he'd made some waves recently with Teapot II. ;) I had done a good check of Google as well (I'll be sure to mention that in the future), and found much of nothing to establish notability.
123:
A silversmith who seems to be entirely known for making a teapot. I searched him for Google, and it seems like his teapot is more notable than him. The article has an advertisement feel to it.
313: 116: 339: 83: 78: 87: 17: 271:
did fly to the moon, and is thus notable; but a crank who tries in his backyard and gets on the TV for it is probably not.
70: 370: 36: 369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
254: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
237: 267:
significance and notable, but a child who produces a pot that wins the school prize for the year is not.
354: 328: 303: 282: 258: 239: 214: 196: 177: 157: 132: 52: 192: 153: 250: 205:
I assumed you did a Google check or else you couldn't have come up with the picture of the teapot.
233: 350: 324: 168:
Um, I would expect nothing to come up in Google News, he made the Teapot over 12 years ago...
74: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
294:
doesn't really apply to this as the teapot became part of a museum's permanent collection.
291: 211: 188: 174: 149: 146: 129: 299: 268: 278: 142: 346: 320: 66: 58: 49: 104: 207: 170: 125: 295: 273: 232:
His work is part of a permanent collection at a notable museum. -
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
290:
per the cultural significance of the teapot he created.
111: 100: 96: 92: 314:list of Living people-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 373:). No further edits should be made to this page. 340:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions 8: 338:: This debate has been included in the 312:: This debate has been included in the 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 355:03:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 329:03:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 304:15:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 283:10:18, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 259:05:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 240:20:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 215:19:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 197:18:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 178:18:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 158:18:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 133:18:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 53:01:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 390: 145:Interesting teapot though 366:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 141:: Nothing came up 357: 343: 331: 317: 381: 368: 344: 334: 318: 308: 114: 108: 90: 44:The result was 34: 389: 388: 384: 383: 382: 380: 379: 378: 377: 371:deletion review 364: 110: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 387: 385: 376: 375: 359: 358: 332: 306: 285: 269:Neil Armstrong 261: 251:Royalhistorian 243: 242: 226: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 200: 199: 181: 180: 161: 160: 121: 120: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 386: 374: 372: 367: 361: 360: 356: 352: 348: 341: 337: 333: 330: 326: 322: 315: 311: 307: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 286: 284: 280: 276: 275: 270: 265: 262: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245: 244: 241: 238: 235: 231: 228: 227: 216: 213: 210: 209: 204: 203: 202: 201: 198: 194: 190: 185: 184: 183: 182: 179: 176: 173: 172: 167: 166: 165: 164: 163: 162: 159: 155: 151: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136: 135: 134: 131: 128: 127: 118: 113: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 365: 362: 335: 309: 287: 272: 263: 246: 229: 206: 169: 138: 124: 122: 67:Albion Smith 59:Albion Smith 45: 43: 31: 28: 189:Chasingsol 150:Chasingsol 347:• Gene93k 321:• Gene93k 292:WP:BLP1E 117:View log 84:protect 79:history 50:John254 212:(talk) 175:(talk) 139:Delete 130:(talk) 112:delete 88:delete 208:Tavix 171:Tavix 143:here. 126:Tavix 115:) – ( 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 351:talk 336:Note 325:talk 310:Note 300:talk 296:Wiw8 288:Keep 279:talk 264:Keep 255:talk 247:Keep 230:Keep 193:talk 154:talk 148:... 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 46:keep 345:-- 342:. 319:-- 316:. 274:DGG 234:Mgm 353:) 327:) 302:) 281:) 257:) 195:) 156:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 349:( 323:( 298:( 277:( 253:( 236:| 191:( 152:( 119:) 109:( 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
John254
01:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Albion Smith
Albion Smith
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Tavix
(talk)
18:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
here.

Chasingsol
talk
18:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Tavix
(talk)
18:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Chasingsol
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.