124:
although it might sound nice, it would be rather absurd, since it does not take that much to get a circle. The concensus here seems to be that unless someone is noted in their field, or has had their work catapulted into public conciousness, or their work linked notably to a major event, they don't cut the mustard, so to speak. 18:53, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
123:
Mm, I am a big fan of the independent media, Jim; but, we don't even have articles for everyone in the mainstream media: what sort of road would we be going down, as an encyclopædia, to just list everyone who has blogged and had some 'influence.' Under such a thing, you would have a page, as would I;
143:
but Alex cant even get away with like a paragraph without some dudes who dont know shit about zines jumping down our throats? Sounds busted to me. I donno but girl selling out of 3 press runs of her zine sounds pretty fucking influential in these days of 'blogs' and 'e-zines' A girl who put a lot of
144:
herself into such awesome, well known, and vital projects such as
Portland Zine Symposium and Independent Publishing Resource Center, and one of like 5 people in the world who can call zines a paid career. This isn't just some random kid with a 100 press run zine that people are into for 5 minutes.
106:
The zine and DIY communities are a lot more vital and important than you seem to realize, linag. Wrekk's contributions to these are quite far-reaching both through her own projects and through her involvement with
87:. I know people who sold more pamphlets than that, but they're not notable outside a narrow and geographical group. 00:09, 11 December 2005
79:
Her last book sold almost 3,000 copies. Whether she thought it would be cool to have a page or not, her work is worth noting. -Alan
17:
125:
88:
212:
36:
211:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
171:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
174:
is so significant and popular, then why is it a red link? In fact, the only subject specific blue link is
194:
159:
148:
115:
112:
101:
68:
52:
187:
175:
145:
49:
183:
179:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
178:, which is a bad, jumbled article that i am not sure is encyclopaedic itself. Furthermore,
111:. Any DIY book as popular as Stolen Sharpie Revolution is a force to be reckoned with.
45:
191:
65:
186:) is an orphan page, which doesn't convince me of its importance. Merge to
156:
98:
108:
205:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
141:
166:
Right, i have cleaned up and wikified the article, but i vote
190:
if anyone else deems any of this info notable, i guess.
155:
And what did your confrontational commentary achieve?
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
215:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
83:I agree with Dr. Disque, to clarify that:
140:so like we can totally get away with
44:The result of the debate was delete.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
195:14:09, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
160:18:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
149:23:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
116:07:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
102:02:55, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
69:23:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
53:18:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
170:, as per everyone else. If
232:
182:(which should be moved to
172:Stolen Sharpie Revolution
208:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
188:Microcosm Publishing
176:Microcosm Publishing
109:Microcosm Publishing
64:Vanity/non-notable
223:
210:
76:. Vanity. read
34:
231:
230:
226:
225:
224:
222:
221:
220:
219:
213:deletion review
206:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
229:
227:
218:
217:
200:
198:
197:
163:
162:
152:
151:
136:
133:
131:
130:
129:
128:
92:
91:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
228:
216:
214:
209:
203:
202:
201:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
164:
161:
158:
154:
153:
150:
147:
142:
139:
138:
137:
134:
127:
122:
121:
120:
119:
118:
117:
114:
110:
104:
103:
100:
96:
90:
86:
82:
81:
80:
77:
75:
71:
70:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
207:
204:
199:
167:
135:
132:
105:
94:
93:
84:
78:
73:
72:
63:
43:
31:
28:
184:Alex Wrekk
180:Alex wrekk
146:Pollyvomit
59:Alex wrekk
97:per nom.
46:Johnleemk
192:Jdcooper
66:Drdisque
168:delete
95:Delete
85:delete
74:Delete
126:Iinag
89:Iinag
16:<
50:Talk
157:PJM
113:Jim
99:PJM
48:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.