328:- Also it should be noted that the information in question simply services the more notable information above. Is it as notable? I agree that it is probably not. However, for an artist I think it is important to have their entire discography available to all those who would like to learn more about him. For encyclopedic purposes, you wouldn't want to simply discard a section of someone's discography because it was before they started doing things that we as editors consider as notable. The information on the profits being donated is simply imformation that is relevant to mentioning his entire discography. The fact that he was scouted by Def Jam and donated all the profit to charity in my mind is relevant, if not notable.
356:
is not determined by individual editors, it is an assessment of the article's ability to meet the
Knowledge defined criteria for notability. Knowledge is not the place to disseminate information about persons that do not meet Knowledge based notability - I suggest that would be better served by a
274:- It said he donated the profits which was over $ 1000, it says nothing about the overhead prices on the album. Before dismissing someone's accomplishment you should read the information more clearly and make sure you understand it. You also did not address the other points of notability either.
162:
386:
214:
Artist has satisfied requirement of notable media stories (CNN, Kotaku, GamePro), has won notable music contest and produced works of consequence for major-award-nominated artists.
117:
156:
243:" for his one and only album, which isn't even toilet-paper money by music industry standards. If we assume they sold for $ 15 each, that means about 65 copies sold!
122:
335:
281:
221:
90:
85:
94:
77:
17:
177:
144:
299:– None of the "news" stories are of a "non-trivial" nature. A one line mention in an article about someone else is not a
455:
36:
138:
454:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
440:
423:
401:
370:
343:
316:
262:
229:
209:
134:
59:
339:
285:
225:
184:
331:
277:
217:
170:
81:
436:
397:
366:
312:
205:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
419:
150:
244:
73:
65:
55:
432:
353:
194:
393:
358:
304:
300:
197:
111:
415:
193:
Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. Appears to fail
50:
448:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
387:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
107:
103:
99:
169:
239:
the article itself confirms non-notability: he made "
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
458:). No further edits should be made to this page.
183:
8:
381:
275:
385:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
441:22:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
424:04:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
402:23:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
371:17:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
344:16:51, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
317:16:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
263:15:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
230:15:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
210:15:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
60:14:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
475:
451:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
357:personal website.
44:The result was
404:
390:
334:comment added by
289:
280:comment added by
220:comment added by
466:
453:
391:
363:
346:
309:
260:
257:
254:
251:
241:more than $ 1000
232:
202:
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
34:
474:
473:
469:
468:
467:
465:
464:
463:
462:
456:deletion review
449:
359:
329:
305:
301:reliable source
258:
255:
252:
249:
215:
198:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
472:
470:
461:
460:
444:
443:
426:
405:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
348:
347:
322:
321:
320:
319:
291:
290:
266:
265:
245:Andrew Lenahan
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
74:Alex Kresovich
68:
66:Alex Kresovich
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
471:
459:
457:
452:
446:
445:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:
403:
399:
395:
388:
384:
380:
379:
372:
368:
364:
362:
355:
352:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
327:
324:
323:
318:
314:
310:
308:
302:
298:
295:
294:
293:
292:
287:
283:
282:97.81.114.82
279:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
261:
246:
242:
238:
235:
234:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
212:
211:
207:
203:
201:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
450:
447:
428:
414:coverage. --
411:
407:
382:
360:
336:97.81.114.82
325:
306:
296:
276:— Preceding
271:
248:
240:
236:
222:97.81.114.82
213:
199:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
412:substantial
330:—Preceding
216:—Preceding
157:free images
354:Notability
431:per nom.
394:• Gene93k
433:Spatulli
332:unsigned
278:unsigned
218:unsigned
118:View log
410:- Zero
326:Comment
297:Comment
272:Comment
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
429:Delete
416:Bejnar
408:Delete
361:ttonyb
307:ttonyb
237:Delete
200:ttonyb
195:WP:BIO
135:Google
95:delete
46:delete
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
437:talk
420:talk
398:talk
383:Note
367:talk
340:talk
313:talk
286:talk
226:talk
206:talk
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
392:--
303:.
256:bli
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
439:)
422:)
400:)
389:.
369:)
342:)
315:)
288:)
259:nd
253:ar
250:St
247:-
228:)
208:)
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
435:(
418:(
396:(
365:(
338:(
311:(
284:(
224:(
204:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.