316:, is a scandal involving the subject, which is conveniently not mentioned in this article. Other than that, there's very little out there that is useful, and certainly nothing that covers him to the extent or the tone of the WP article. Nevertheless, AFC already decided it was not suitable for Knowledge (XXG), and it was moved into article space without being changed; therefore, it doesn't belong in article space, and needs to remain in draft space until such time as it is suitable for inclusion.
339:. If you think the scandal belongs in the article and you've found a source for it, then put in content about the scandal (though I read your source and it's a passing reference, mentioning him as a "con-man" as a throw-away line). Just because the article isn't perfect, doesn't mean it has to be deleted. Though I
312:
to the rest of it, University of Cape Coast is not independent because Asiedu is on the board, and the Peace FM source is a speech he gave at a conference whose notability is indeterminate. So yes, I can see exactly how this might be construed as PROMO, especially because the first GHit is his company, and
374:. It's pretty clear from the workflow that a declined article doesn't go out in mainspace, and this one clearly did, because I have tracked the edits showing what happened. That's policy as far as I'm concerned, but hey, feel free to tell AfC their role is meaningless. They'll appreciate that, I'm sure.
311:
I do re-review it for sources, the Sun Online sources will disappear entirely because they don't appear to exist (nor does the website, period), Gulf
African Review is a trivial mention, Tv3 has a picture but doesn't mention the subject by name in the article until the third paragraph as a response
346:
You said "It is not up to me to re-review the article for policy compliance and decide whether it's good or not." Um, if you are going to nominate an article for deletion, you'd better review it for policy compliance while nominating. I'm still waiting for the link to the policy that says the
307:- The article was declined at AFC; that means that by default, it was "not suitable for Knowledge (XXG)." It is not up to me to re-review the article for policy compliance and decide whether it's good or not; AFC has already done that. I will tell you that
262:
Furthermore, I can find no policy that forbids creation of the article in the manner in which it was created. There's nothing stopping someone from creating an article if he/she has the permissions to do so. I can find nothing at
371:
334:
I disagree with your assessment of the sources. Gulf
African review is not a trivial mention, there's whole paragraphs about him in the article. TV3 is also a more than trivial mention. Those two combine to pass
166:
209:
into mainspace after being declined at AfC. Prodded by one editor after that point, PROD removed. CSD added by me for policy violation, CSD removed, now at AfD. SPI opened as well.
279:, it should have been attributed. If the nominator believes that copying from AfC to an article is forbidden, I urge him to cite the relevant policy or guideline in his nomination.
119:
160:
347:
article shouldn't have been created. People need not get an approved AfC before an article is created; I've created dozens of articles myself, none of them using AfC.
126:
313:
92:
87:
96:
17:
79:
181:
148:
388:
They are meaningless in the sense that it is not imperative for an article to pass the AfC process to exist as an article.
433:
40:
395:
354:
286:
242:
142:
406:
383:
365:
325:
297:
253:
218:
61:
138:
400:
359:
291:
247:
202:
83:
268:
429:
390:
349:
281:
237:
188:
36:
75:
67:
57:
174:
379:
321:
214:
154:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
428:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
336:
276:
264:
232:
228:
53:
235:. Promotional content has been removed, but there's plenty of sourced content left.
52:
by Bbb23, CSD G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban.
375:
317:
210:
113:
343:
remove the info about his education because I couldn't find any source for it.
275:
copying from a declined AfC to an article; the only thing amiss is that, per
422:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
206:
198:
109:
105:
101:
173:
197:
Avoidance of AFC by sockpuppets. Exact duplicate of
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
436:). No further edits should be made to this page.
227:Nominator has not explained how this violates
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
453:
372:AfC reviewing instructions
205:(declined for PROMO) then
407:01:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
384:23:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
366:23:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
326:23:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
298:22:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
254:22:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
219:22:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
62:04:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
425:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
203:Draft:Alexander Asiedu
314:the very next hit
444:
427:
405:
403:
398:
393:
364:
362:
357:
352:
296:
294:
289:
284:
252:
250:
245:
240:
207:copy/paste moved
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
76:Alexander Asiedu
68:Alexander Asiedu
34:
452:
451:
447:
446:
445:
443:
442:
441:
440:
434:deletion review
423:
401:
396:
391:
389:
360:
355:
350:
348:
292:
287:
282:
280:
248:
243:
238:
236:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
450:
448:
439:
438:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
344:
329:
328:
301:
300:
257:
256:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
50:speedy deleted
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
449:
437:
435:
431:
426:
420:
419:
408:
404:
399:
394:
387:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
363:
358:
353:
345:
342:
338:
333:
332:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
315:
310:
306:
303:
302:
299:
295:
290:
285:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
260:
259:
258:
255:
251:
246:
241:
234:
230:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
424:
421:
340:
308:
304:
272:
269:WP:COPYPASTE
224:
199:declined AfC
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
54:Malcolmxl5
430:talk page
370:Read the
37:talk page
432:or in a
120:View log
39:or in a
376:MSJapan
318:MSJapan
273:forbids
211:MSJapan
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
337:WP:GNG
277:WP:CWW
267:or at
265:WP:AFC
233:WP:NOT
229:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
305:Reply
271:that
225:Keep:
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
380:talk
322:talk
215:talk
201:for
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
341:did
231:or
189:TWL
118:– (
382:)
324:)
309:if
217:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
402:p
397:b
392:p
378:(
361:p
356:b
351:p
320:(
293:p
288:b
283:p
249:p
244:b
239:p
213:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.