252:- Per nominator Navou. Hundreds of people have been on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted list and last time I checked not all of them have their own articles. Thus Being placed on the list alone is not notable enough to warrant an article. We really shouldn't waste valuable server space creating unessesary articles.
328:
Its well sourced and enough information. If there is not enough information for people that have been on in the past, they can have a line or two at the main article space. Top 10 is always notable, buy there isn't always enough meat for an entire article.
353:
I think that each fugitive on the Ten Most Wanted list is sufficiently notable to warrant their own page. The fact that not every one has had a page created is not justification for deleting those that do. 3 June 2007
115:
287:. Having articles isn't a waste of 'valuable server space'. Arguments should be based on policy, not on personal dislike of or distaste for article subjects. --
306:
I did not see any reference to the editors like or dislike of the articles subject. How do you address the latter part of the argument referencing
330:
273:
256:
states that articles on people only notable for one event (i.e in this case being placed on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted list) should be
17:
88:
83:
369:
92:
176:
Regardless of who else got an article, and not sure how that argument is helpful here, I'm not really seeing this one satisfy
75:
398:
36:
142:
397:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
261:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
357:
253:
383:
345:
333:
314:
293:
276:
264:
244:
228:
212:
200:
184:
167:
148:
126:
57:
137:
257:
365:
361:
311:
181:
135:
If references were added it would be suitable, its not just anyones top 10, its the FBI's. Regards --
123:
209:
157:
79:
272:
Hundreds of articles would fit on a floppy disk, probably a hundredth of cent of disk space. --
288:
223:
197:
164:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
235:
284:
177:
53:
307:
71:
63:
380:
161:
109:
122:
I can't really see how being added to anybody's top ten is particularly notable.
379:
it is notable enough to be on top of the fbi list so it is notable for us too
342:
50:
160:) get a page, then this guy should. It just needs a little cleanup. --
220:
Looks fine to me. It has sources, but just needs to be cleaned up.
391:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
196:
Because he's covered by multiple independent sources.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
401:). No further edits should be made to this page.
341:FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives are notable. --
8:
156:If all the other current FBI Top Tenners (
260:to that particular event. Sincerely, --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
208:per multiple independent sources.
24:
331:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
274:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
1:
285:Knowledge (XXG) is not paper
418:
394:Please do not modify it.
384:01:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
346:22:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
334:21:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
315:19:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
294:19:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
277:21:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
265:18:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
245:17:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
213:16:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
201:16:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
185:16:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
168:16:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
149:15:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
127:15:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
58:03:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
360:comment was added by
237:As cool as grapes...
262:William Howard Hart
218:Keep and Cleanup —
158:Glen Stewart Godwin
373:
241:
409:
396:
355:
291:
238:
233:
231:
226:
147:
113:
95:
34:
417:
416:
412:
411:
410:
408:
407:
406:
405:
399:deletion review
392:
356:—The preceding
289:
236:
229:
224:
136:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
415:
413:
404:
403:
387:
386:
374:
348:
336:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
299:
298:
297:
296:
279:
247:
215:
210:SakotGrimshine
203:
190:
189:
188:
187:
171:
170:
151:
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
414:
402:
400:
395:
389:
388:
385:
382:
378:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
352:
349:
347:
344:
340:
337:
335:
332:
327:
324:
323:
316:
313:
309:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
295:
292:
286:
283:
280:
278:
275:
271:
268:
267:
266:
263:
259:
255:
251:
250:Strong Delete
248:
246:
243:
242:
239:
232:
227:
219:
216:
214:
211:
207:
204:
202:
199:
195:
192:
191:
186:
183:
179:
175:
174:
173:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
152:
150:
146:
145:
141:
140:
134:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:Alexis Flores
69:
68:
65:
64:Alexis Flores
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
393:
390:
376:
350:
338:
325:
281:
269:
249:
222:
221:
217:
205:
198:Nick mallory
193:
153:
143:
139:The Sunshine
138:
132:
121:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
362:RyanGentry
225:*Cremepuff
258:redirects
133:Weak Keep
370:contribs
358:unsigned
290:Charlene
116:View log
381:yuckfoo
282:Comment
270:Comment
162:PAK Man
89:protect
84:history
178:WP:BIO
93:delete
343:Kitch
312:Navou
182:Navou
124:Navou
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
377:keep
366:talk
351:Keep
339:Keep
326:Keep
308:WP:N
254:WP:N
230:222*
206:Keep
194:Keep
154:Keep
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
46:keep
144:Man
114:– (
372:).
368:•
329:--
310:?
180:.
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
54:13
51:Sr
48:.
364:(
240:"
234:"
165:+
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.