215:
According to WP:PROF the individual must have won a national or international award, this is clearly stated in the article - "In 2004 she became the first girl to win a gold medal for the United States team in the
International Mathematical Olympiad". The article passed WP:PROF. It should be
277:
undergraduate or graduate level) do not qualify under
Criterion 2 and do not count towards partially satisfying Criterion 1." No evidence the person is a major force in the field, with widespread influence, or academic accomplishments at all comparable to being a "Distinguished Professor."
276:
which lists the Nobel Prize, the
Pulitzer Prize for History, or the MacArthur Award. Note the section which says "Victories in academic student competitions at the high school and university level as well as other awards and honors for academic student achievements (at either high school,
294:
In addition to the well stated arguments above, the article completely lacks references that establish notability. They're all essentially primary sources. I've searched for secondary news coverage of her, and can find nothing. So, this page needs to go.
156:
405:
440:
360:. To merge trivial biographical details to one of our list articles would seem to place far too much emphasis on a single participant. I don't really see this as a desirable or even realistic option.
503:
instead. But I've found and added some sources to the article that I think should be sufficient for GNG: two in-depth articles in Wired and a local newspaper, and a name-check in the New York Times. —
187:
Deprodded page on a mathematics graduate student who won some student awards. Past results from AfDs shows that such student awards are not sufficient for notability, certainly not enough to pass
333:, for example, and there seem to be plenty more sources which demonstrate that she has been noticed. Worst case is therefore merger into some list of maths olympians and so, per our
436:
382:
272:
looks for more distinguished achievements than winning a student competition, which is not the "highly prestigious academic award or honor" required.See the section of
150:
117:
521:
245:
explicitly excludes student awards, and this is consistent with how it has been applied in the past. It does not work as the basis for a keep vote in this case.
432:
455:. I think the above assessment is basically correct – this is very far short of our traditional notability threshold for maths people. Respectfully,
191:. Most importantly, the page does not (and cannot) point to any contributions or discoveries she made that would warrent an encylopedia article.
444:
17:
90:
85:
94:
447:, but in the way that event is conducted, there actually is not a single gold, but many. Moreover, Miller seems to be the first
77:
367:
252:
171:
138:
552:
268:
Certainly a promising graduate student, but come back in a few years when there are more substantial accomplishments.
36:
361:
246:
551:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
508:
342:
226:
132:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
528:
if you put things in (national) perspective. She gets written about because "Math is doing great in the USA".
537:
512:
482:
464:
420:
397:
371:
346:
321:
304:
300:
286:
256:
229:
206:
128:
59:
334:
296:
478:
460:
431:. We basically have a notability precedent in situations like this one only for multiple wins of the
317:
178:
504:
338:
217:
201:
164:
533:
81:
416:
393:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
496:
492:
330:
273:
269:
242:
188:
282:
500:
144:
474:
456:
313:
193:
55:
529:
73:
65:
412:
389:
111:
278:
50:
312:, not yet notable enough to be listed in a general reference encyclopedia.
545:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
495:
and she's too junior to have attained the impact necessary for
406:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
524:
had extensive coverage on his gov't website, which beats
443:. The strongest claim here seems to be Miller's gold at
107:
103:
99:
163:
177:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
555:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
404:Note: This debate has been included in the
383:list of Science-related deletion discussions
381:Note: This debate has been included in the
403:
380:
491:. Student awards are not relevant for
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
451:woman to win gold, not the first
337:, there is no case for deletion.
1:
572:
548:Please do not modify it.
499:, so we have to rely on
60:04:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
538:09:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
513:17:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
483:22:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
465:21:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
421:19:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
398:19:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
372:13:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
347:18:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
322:18:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
305:16:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
287:15:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
257:11:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
230:09:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
207:03:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
329:She is named-checked
522:That Moldavian guy
44:The result was
423:
409:
400:
386:
563:
550:
410:
387:
364:
249:
224:
223:
205:
198:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
571:
570:
566:
565:
564:
562:
561:
560:
559:
553:deletion review
546:
362:
247:
219:
218:
194:
192:
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
569:
567:
558:
557:
541:
540:
515:
505:David Eppstein
486:
468:
425:
424:
401:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
363:Sławomir Biały
350:
349:
339:Colonel Warden
335:editing policy
324:
307:
289:
262:
261:
260:
259:
248:Sławomir Biały
233:
232:
221:CrossTempleJay
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
568:
556:
554:
549:
543:
542:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
487:
484:
480:
476:
473:. Too early.
472:
469:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
407:
402:
399:
395:
391:
384:
379:
373:
369:
365:
359:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
306:
302:
298:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
275:
271:
267:
264:
263:
258:
254:
250:
244:
240:
237:
236:
235:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
203:
199:
197:
190:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:Alison Miller
71:
70:
67:
66:Alison Miller
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
547:
544:
525:
517:
488:
470:
452:
448:
428:
357:
326:
309:
297:Vertigo Acid
291:
265:
238:
220:
212:
195:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
435:, e.g. see
151:free images
497:WP:PROF#C1
475:Xxanthippe
457:Agricola44
327:Keep/merge
314:NawlinWiki
413:• Gene93k
390:• Gene93k
202:reasoning
196:Abductive
530:Tijfo098
449:American
118:View log
493:WP:PROF
358:Comment
274:WP:PROF
270:WP:PROF
243:WP:PROF
239:Comment
216:kept.--
189:WP:PROF
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
518:Delete
501:WP:GNG
471:Delete
433:Putnam
429:Delete
310:Delete
292:Delete
279:Edison
266:Delete
129:Google
95:delete
46:delete
526:Wired
453:woman
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
534:talk
509:talk
489:Keep
479:talk
461:talk
441:this
439:and
437:this
417:talk
394:talk
368:talk
343:talk
331:here
318:talk
301:talk
283:talk
253:talk
227:talk
213:Keep
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
445:IOM
411:--
388:--
241:.
179:TWL
116:– (
536:)
520:.
511:)
481:)
463:)
419:)
408:.
396:)
385:.
370:)
345:)
320:)
303:)
285:)
255:)
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
532:(
507:(
485:.
477:(
467:.
459:(
415:(
392:(
366:(
341:(
316:(
299:(
281:(
251:(
204:)
200:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.