287:
her professional history is well documented elsewhere and can be found with little effort thereby reflecting that she is an actress who is well established. Subsequently the existence of the page should be allowed by her tenure in industry. Additionally, since the page was not created as a marketing ploy but rather by a fan, deletion of the page should not be so quickly considered. Time should be allotted so that the page may grow and mature to reflect the addition of more sources.
354:) 05:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC) I also came across a review at hoes.com (less than 2nd tier site) which gives an exceptional review. It states Overall Rank: 89 of 4142 and Niche Rank: 1 of 37. I would like to add this to the entry but do not want to link to explicit material or come across like an advertisement. Any suggestions on how to work this into the entry in a way that meets standards would be appreciated.
197:
assure you that I had a valid reason to create the entry. I am not associated with the FTV site in anyway nor was I involved in the other attempted entries. My roommate is a big fan of Alison Angel and I am a fan of
Knowledge. I was so surprised that there was not an entry that I finally created a log in. I hope the entry meets the minimum standard and would be happy to see someone expand it if possible.
215:
XBiz Awards are not well known and do not have independent coverage in reliable sources similar to AVN Awards. Second that amsterdam convention description as source doesn't seem reliable. I wonder if it's a mirror of a prior deleted wiki article on her. Second, outing her identity with such a source
239:
Xbiz award is second tier, not really enough to save the article. Bigger issue is that it's completely unreferenced other than the award. The only return she has under "Alison" or "Allison" Angel on either XBIZ or AVN is appearing on the nomination list for the XBIZ awards. 0 gnews hits, and I'm not
184:
I believe it should be noted that people find Alison Angel "worthy of notice" and "interesting" as laid out in the notability guidelines. Most importantly, these guidelines clearly state "It is a generally accepted standard that editors should follow though it should be treated with common sense and
286:
Alison Angel is well known in the industry. She has been awarded several positive reviews by independent critics not affiliated with FTV. For example from www.thebstporn.com and the www.rabbitsreviews.com she was given several ratings on her films that were well rated. More information regarding
267:
Well if the general consensus is to scrap the only thing I can request is that it receives an unbiased review if sources turn up over the next year to justify a fourth attempt. To clarify, her identity wasn't "outed" by me. If you spend more than 2 minutes searching Google it will come up at sites
196:
From looking at the discussion for the first and second attempts at an entry, this third version is completely different. Both discussion pages had requests to keep, modify, or weak delete. This is the third attempt for this page which I hope shows some interest amongst the community. I want to
345:
I just found a site with about a dozen independant reviews from other porn websites. They range from 82%-92%. Will something like this improve the entry? 08-18-08 Planet Climax 8.3 of 10 08-08-08 Adult Site Surfer 89 of 100 11-15-07 Porn
Inspector 4.3 of 5 07-05-07 Elite Porn Reviews 8.9 of 10
346:
06-01-07 Quality
Amateur Paysites 89 of 100 03-27-07 TheTongue.net 89 of 100 12-11-06 Porn Billy 87.3 of 100 10-31-06 3X Explorer 84 of 100 08-14-06 What Porn Site 86.7 of 100 06-28-06 Pam's Reviews 9.2 of 10 06-09-06 Lil' Babes 8.2 of 10 01-17-06 Gottabeporn 85 of 100
185:
the occasional exception" and "This notability guideline for biographies is not policy". Multiple blogs, forums, and social networking sites show that she has a fan base. This, when coupled with popular reviews, shows some level of notability.
192:
is already worthy of having an entry it could potentially be added to the list of acceptable sources for awards in the adult industry. I certainly think it is on par with some of the other sites listed as acceptable.
92:
87:
153:
48:. And recognize the good faith attempt by the author; I am willing to userfy the article for further offline development for potential inclusion in the future.
82:
244:
on the first few pages of google returns. Coupled with this having been deleted previously, and I'm not seeing any reason for it to be kept. Fails
294:
120:
115:
363:
339:
322:
302:
277:
261:
229:
206:
173:
124:
65:
17:
107:
377:
36:
376:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
225:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
298:
257:
111:
318:
290:
221:
169:
103:
71:
359:
351:
335:
273:
202:
161:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
253:
61:
314:
57:
165:
245:
217:
355:
347:
331:
269:
241:
198:
141:
249:
50:
370:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
189:
268:
such as myyearbook.com and this wasn't a mirror of anything.
188:
I also believe it should be taken into account that since
164:-- XBIZ not listed under categories for major porn awards
148:
137:
133:
129:
93:
Articles for deletion/Alison Angel (3rd nomination)
88:
Articles for deletion/Alison Angel (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
380:). No further edits should be made to this page.
240:seeing anything that looks like an independent
8:
330:No significant coverage or notable awards.
252:, and probably several other requirements.
160:Porn actress does not appear to fulfill
220:. I am challenging it and removing it.
80:
7:
78:
83:Articles for deletion/Alison Angel
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
364:06:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
340:12:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
323:18:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
303:05:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
278:22:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
262:01:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
66:01:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
230:15:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
207:03:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
174:03:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
397:
373:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
44:The result was
305:
293:comment added by
64:
388:
375:
288:
151:
145:
127:
56:
53:
34:
396:
395:
391:
390:
389:
387:
386:
385:
384:
378:deletion review
371:
313:- per above. --
242:reliable source
147:
118:
102:
99:
97:
75:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
394:
392:
383:
382:
343:
342:
325:
307:
306:
295:98.232.168.219
265:
264:
233:
232:
222:Morbidthoughts
178:
158:
157:
98:
96:
95:
90:
85:
79:
76:
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
393:
381:
379:
374:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
285:
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
238:
235:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
194:
191:
186:
183:
179:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
155:
150:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
372:
369:
344:
327:
310:
283:
266:
236:
212:
195:
187:
181:
180:
177:
159:
104:Alison Angel
72:Alison Angel
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
289:—Preceding
254:Horrorshowj
315:Qwerty1234
162:WP:PORNBIO
58:delusional
216:violates
166:Editor437
291:unsigned
154:View log
62:kangaroo
356:Cptnono
348:Cptnono
332:Epbr123
270:Cptnono
199:Cptnono
121:protect
116:history
328:Delete
246:WP:BIO
237:Delete
218:WP:BLP
213:Delete
149:delete
125:delete
46:Delete
152:) – (
142:views
134:watch
130:links
52:Jerry
16:<
360:talk
352:talk
336:talk
319:talk
311:Keep
299:talk
284:Keep
274:talk
258:talk
250:WP:V
226:talk
203:talk
190:XBIZ
182:Keep
170:talk
138:logs
112:talk
108:edit
362:)
338:)
321:)
301:)
276:)
260:)
248:,
228:)
205:)
172:)
140:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
60:¤
358:(
350:(
334:(
317:(
297:(
272:(
256:(
224:(
201:(
168:(
156:)
146:(
144:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.