1309:. I know that that article has its own problems, but since it is already there, the fact that some people have chosen to use a word in another language ("apartheid") to refer to a related concept, does not merit a separate article with that word in the title. And I know the argument will be that the resulting article would be too long, but this article really does not need to be as long as it is anyway. We do not need to be citing every article in every little magazine, or every master's thesis, that refers to the issue. I think a lot of the sources are in there solely due to the controversy over the article's existence, to "make weight" for keeping it as a separate article.
2138:). I suspect that there are enough scholarly, well referenced and peer-reviewed articles from professional historians and sociologists to provide an account of this topic. Maybe near the bottom of the article there could be one small paragraph for "Media coverage" and a very selective account of commentary from blogs, reporters and media pundits could be restricted to that paragraph. --
1491:. Whether or not the article is NPOV in its current state is a consideration for cleanup tagging, not deletion. We don't delete articles for being poor quality, we delete articles because the topic they are about don't deserve an article. In this case, the allegations are there, they have been extensively referenced proving that the
2103:"XfD(deletion) processes are not a way to complain or remove material that is personally disliked, whose perspective is against ones beliefs, or which is not yet presented neutrally. Using XfD as a "protest strategy" in an editorial or NPOV debate is generally an abuse of process and the article will usually be speedy kept."
1879:- definitely a notable POV, with 80,000 Google hits and numerous scholarly and academic sources referring to the concept. Article is also well referenced. No reason at all for deletion as far as I can see. Might possibly be an argument though for changing the title or broadening the subject matter, but that's another issue.
1819:
nom. It is a meme which passes notability. People will certainly be looking for information about it. The forced renaming was a silly abrogation of
Knowledge (XXG)'s naming conventions fueled by POV... this nom strays over from there into attempting to enshrine POV bias as a Knowledge (XXG) standard. --
1818:
The article is heavily referenced... making the claims of 'original research' and 'unverifiability' seem nonsensical. NPOV is often a matter of perspective, but frankly irrelevant to a deletion debate. If it isn't neutral we change the wording, not delete it. See NO basis whatsoever for this deletion
1121:
Is there? All the serious stuff I've seen has been about the way the term is used, or else discussing discrimination in general. I've not seen a single, serious academic source (i.e. a scholar who is employed in a relevant field in a university) argue that there's such a thing as "Israeli apartheid."
1294:
If you talk about the term perse, yes you are correct. However, scholars do make comparisons between South Africa and Israel, and their conclusions are straightforward. On the title of the article, the current is POV, as it denies the scholary studies, but for the rest, I do not care abut the exact
256:
Whilst you probably can find allegations of any position, this allegation seems to have come up a lot, and been made by many notable people and organisations (and more have either referred to or denied it). In my opinion, it's significant enough, verifiable enough, and messy enough that we probably
1177:
Drawing on a range of historical and sociological evidence, it shows that this claim (or accusation) is substantially justified in two senses. Firstly, Israeli
Zionism is, in many areas, morally bad in the same way as apartheid; secondly, where it is different from apartheid in character, it is in
799:
that argument, as some here argue, it hardly seems encyclopedic. If we have to have articles about every instance an epithet is used on someone in a new way (Ann
Coulter's "church of liberalism" or 9/11 victims as "little Eichmann's" in the very recent past come to mind) wikipedia is going to seem
652:
As Sue-Laine eloquently said, this article has morphed and been changed to continue its survival so many times, that to me it seems apparent that its goal is more to disparage Israel than to inform as to facts.We now have an article for human rights issues, anything that is a valid issue should be
1304:
Yes, let's look at those sources. They seem to level the "apartheid" charge not only at Israel's treatment of the population of the West Bank and Gaza, but at "Zionism" as a whole -- in other words, at the belief that there should be a State of Israel as a Jewish state. That being the case, the
1803:
I voted keep on the first one. The result on the second one was speedy keep. However, I would much appreciate any contact being via my talkpage. I believe in a transparent wikipedia. E-mailing me about a vote on a highly charged and controversial subject gives the appearance of vote stacking and
873:
because it cannot be made NPOV like most "allegations" type articles: the selection of whose allegations of what about whom is inherently POV. If someone called
Clinton a "pinko", or does the mere existence of the urban myth of how Clinton supposedly sought Soviet citizenship during his visit to
2105:
Without making a judgment on the worth of the article in question, Haham hanuka's nomination is a clear abuse of process. I note also that Haham hanuka has just recently been blocked for a week for another abuse of process on AfD and has a long history of blocks for 3RR and revert warring (see
1378:
OR and POV magnet. The article is essentially about comparing the
Israeli-Arab relations with South African aparthed. The comparisons are OR. Let's put out verified sourced statements about what exactly the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians and let the reader decide whether or not to draw
993:
of course we should keep it. As previously discussed, the term is in wide use, there are weighty arguments supporting the usage, there are scholarly works using the term. And unfortunately, the phenomenon also exists. If I thought you could get rid of something by deleting the
Knowledge (XXG)
592:
Furthermore, much as we have a well-meaning wish to help the reader understand whether there is validity to allegations of
Israeli apartheid, it's not something that can really be covered in an encyclopedic fashion because the term "apartheid" in modern, colloquial discourse has no concrete
448:, not to remove the article. The allegation of "Israeli apartheid" has been made in various sources over a period of several years; there is no reason why Knowledge (XXG) should not document this usage (along with the debates surrounding the term), and every reason why we should.
1265:), that none of these sources actually allege that Israel practices apartheid. What these sources do is compare Israel's practices to apartheid. Nuanced comparison is what scholars do. Reducing a complex situation into a slogan, like "Israeli apartheid," is what activists do.
247:. Although the article is well written and meticulously referenced, cited and sourced, I still think the article is inherently POV. One can find sources for people making allegations of virtually ANY position you can dream of, but does that mean they all deserve articles?
391:
isn't about
Islamofascism. It's about the term, how it was created, how it's used. This article is just a big rant on allegations of Israeli Apartheid and how the author(s) beleive that it's true. It's not encyclopedic. It's not NPOV at all. It doesn't belong here.
2133:
and improve. There is a very large published literature on this topic. Under such conditions, I think it is wise for the
Knowledge (XXG) community to be very selective and make an organized effort to identify and cite mostly peer-reviewed scholarly articles (see:
1184:
Israeli
Zionism resembles apartheid in a range of ways recognizable to specialists in comparative race relations, and indeed scholars have done interesting historical-sociological work on the similarities and differences between them (e.g. Greenberg 1980, Akenson
333:- allegations of Israel human rights violations do merit articles (though one can always wonder the paucity of such articles about other states and regimes who do much worse), but the term "apartheid" is a rhetorical device that distracts from the real issue. --
1599:), precisely so that it could get a Speedy Keep designation. It lasted all of 34 minutes. This is in fact only the second AfD. The article has had a great deal of time to mature since the first AfD, but instead of getting better, it's only gotten worse. --
122:
1160:
of the sources you cite (and you know this already) allege that there is such a thing as "Israeli apartheid," as I said above. That is the problem with this article. Not one academic source (that I am aware of) says there is actually such a thing.
1915:
The article is about an (alleged) phenomenon and controversial subject that needs to be treated evenhandedly without censorship based on politics. Any "propaganda" needs to be countered with verifiable information that tells the other side of the
1864:
1525:
AfD debate. It is a very big problem with WP that people create articles that are inherently POV and fob off all critcs with an arrogant "So fix it...". The burden of justifying controversial articles must lie on those who made them.
1196:"Dr. Uri Davis is an honorary research fellow at the University of Durham's Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (IMEIS) and at the University of Exeter's Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies (IAIS)." That is from
2061:, allegations of Israeli apartheid are commonplace, and noteworthy, so they need to be covered in an encyclopedia. The article has covered the issue well, and should be allowed to continue to do so without censorship.
1998:
Those who use the term "Apartheid" in reference to Israeli policies are probably POV, but pointing out that those allegations exist, and explaining their point of view from a neutral point of view, is bonafide.
1483:
1960:
To apply the term "Apartheid" to Israel's policies, which is totally false, is a way to delegitimate Israel, with the hope that it will end the same way the Apartheid regime in SA ended. Thats why.
1200:, article on the man who wrote "Israel: An Apartheid State". Based on the reasons being given I suspect that many of the people voting here have not actually read the article they want to delete.
116:
1792:
I was asked via E-mail to take a look at this. As I recall, I voted delete in the last one. Perhpas I was wrong. As the result of the last one was speedy keep, I see no need for this AfD at all.
1903:. POV is not grounds for deletion. POV is correctable through judicious editing and collaboration-- the hallmark of Knowledge (XXG) at its best. As to purported inaccuracy, the benchmark is
662:
Per 84.238.25.152's reasoning, I think it is silly for such allegations to have its own article. However, I think Szvest is correct that it belongs on Knowledge (XXG). Just like various
215:
Seems well written and well sourced, referencing internationally renowned news sources. The potential to offend is not grounds for deletion, nor does it make an article unencyclopedic.
53:
703:-- any legitimate concerns about human rights violations should be dealt with in the neutral article on the subject, without all of the problems inherent in a title like this one.
826:
we do not need articles based on an allegation or based on a viewpoint. Issues related to Israeli internal policy, society, culture, etc, can be explored in the related articles.
349:
page I don't see why we can't have this well-documented article. Plus the section on counter-arguments is useful and constructive for those wanting to counter such claims. —
1907:
and not whether or not one agrees with the information presented. The article is large enough to stand on its own and would overly expand other articles. Does not violate
757:
687:
Unsavoury subject, but a very real political discussion (or propaganda battle, if you prefer) of which neutral coverage is certaily encyclopedic. Do not merge into
1470:- the title is perhaps not the best (perhaps something like "Ethnical discrimination in Israel" would be better), but in no way should the information be lost. //
597:
exists, but if we restricted the article to that definition it would practically disappear.) You can have a coherent, NPOV article about whether Israel practices
2121:
Where else but Knowledge (XXG) am I supposed to go for a sourced NPOV article of what the (to me) bizzare notion of "Israeli apartheid" is supposed to be about?
1860:
406:- Also, so what if it passed a previous AfD? That's not an automatic pass for all future ones, it just means it shouldn't be re-nominated again for a while. --
321:
1522:
753:
1078:. It is POV and unencyclopedic to single out one country for special demonization, and the term itself, "Israeli apartheid", is novel and a neologism. --
300:
The article is not in arbitration. The conduct of editors is in arbitration. ArbCom does not address content disputes (or isn't supposed to, anyway).
135:- We've just changed the title of the article from "Israeli Apartheid" to "Allegations of Israeli Apartheid". Indeed, it's very encyclopaedic. It may
800:
less like an encyclopedia and more like a collection of badly written flamewars about topics that are ultimately going to be completely irrelevant.
418:
I agree that it would be better to retitle the article as "Israeli apartheid" and provide a neutral investigation of the term's historical usage.
1143:
AKENSON, DONALD HARMAN 1992 God’s Peoples: Covenant and Land in South Africa, Israel, and Ulster, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press
495:
613:, because these are all well-defined terms. "Apartheid," as most of the sources used in this article use it, is a vague political insult.
1556:. The article can (should) explore the validity of such a phrase, but the phrase has been used for several years -- much longer than
968:
17:
1140:
GREENBERG, STANLEY 1980 Race and State in Capitalist Development: South Africa in Comparative Perspective, Johannesburg: Ravan Press
2171:
2154:
2150:. It is in fact extremely POV to pretend (whether one agrees with it or not) that there are no allegations of Israeli apartheid. --
2142:
2125:
2113:
2089:
2077:
2065:
2053:
2029:
2016:
2003:
1988:
1964:
1950:
1936:
1920:
1895:
1883:
1871:
1847:
1835:
1823:
1808:
1796:
1779:
1753:
1738:
1726:
1709:
1679:
1660:
1648:
1627:
1614:
1586:
1574:
1544:
1530:
1512:
1499:
Israeli apartheid is verifiable and notable whether or not it actually exists, so obviously keep. Don't like the way it's written?
1454:
1442:
1418:
1406:
1394:
1370:
1326:
1313:
1299:
1269:
1237:
1204:
1191:
1167:
1152:
1128:
1106:
1093:
1062:
1050:
1034:
1022:
998:
985:
981:
How many times do we have to do this dance? "Israeli Aparthied" would obviously be more NPOV a title as that is the exact claim...
973:
953:
941:
929:
917:
903:
886:
865:
839:
818:
804:
779:
760:
744:
729:
713:
695:
679:
657:
639:
617:
547:
529:
511:
468:
452:
436:
422:
410:
396:
376:
360:
337:
304:
291:
279:
261:
251:
239:
227:
207:
190:
178:
156:
105:
85:
1351:
1137:
Glaser, D. J. 2003. Zionism and Apartheid: a moral comparison. Ethnic and Racial Studies 26:403-421. (pdf available on request)
879:
653:(and likely already can be) found in that article. The current purpose of this article is now defunct, and it should be removed.
92:
666:, it is used enough that it is a notable enough for inclusion. Where to put it then? Per Avraham, I think it sounds logical to
317:
961:
of course. The original title was better; but this is silly politicing that just repeats the prior AfD with no new reason.
962:
223:
of Israeli apartheid". The text of the article proves that such allegations are a reality and asserts their notability. --
2135:
1560:, for example. There is no question that it will be a POV lightening rod, but so are other articles in Knowledge (XXG).
1390:
875:
2186:
1071:
60:
36:
1402:. An article here will give both sides their view. The term is widely used, and deserves thus encyclopaedic coverage.
1566:
898:
775:
1319:
1355:
1075:
663:
2185:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
2012:
But there doesn't have to be a separate article about it, nor one that has the word "apartheid" in the title.
1480:
1007:
491:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1178:
some respects anyway as bad – that is, the difference is not invariably morally favourable to Israeli Zionism.
569:
Much of the article now consists of quotes from people who do not say Israel practices apartheid, but instead
1865:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for arbitration/Israeli apartheid/Proposed decision#Meanwhile in the real world
1102:
of recent literature on the subject from credible, academic sources -- some of it dating back twenty years.
2086:
1917:
1805:
1793:
835:
171:
1011:
483:
1451:
1018:
01:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Changed my vote, to mush scholary information to merge with other article. --
688:
669:
648:
628:
566:"Israeli apartheid" but has always consisted of a set of arguments about whether Israeli apartheid exists.
487:
1868:
1820:
1657:
1318:
Apartheid goes way further than racism, but merging this article with that article and renaming that to
1201:
895:
464:
into another article, per my comments scattered through the many archived talk pages for this article.
325:
1266:
1234:
636:
614:
301:
1386:
1323:
1296:
1188:
1165:
1149:
1126:
1019:
1015:
926:
915:
1843:
it has no basis here, it is just pushing propaganda, and does not show an accurate history. Delete.
925:, article has improved since I proposed it for deletion a few months ago and the title is now NPOV.
2167:
2074:
1624:
1583:
982:
883:
741:
1844:
1582:. This is the third AfD on this, anyone want to start taking bets on when the fourth will be? --
580:
consider them to be examples of apartheid? What is the 2005 Gaza withdrawal doing in this article?
555:
This article has always suffered from lack of a coherent reason to exist and probably always will.
2110:
2049:, it appears the material is already amply covered in other articles in a less POV soapboxy way.
2026:
1892:
1439:
1363:
1306:
1014:, focussing on scholary studies comparing the Israeli situation with South African apartheid. --
938:
726:
632:
594:
524:
433:
248:
161:
345:
since it survived a prior AfD — I'm no fan of this sort of propaganda, but as long as we have a
1047:
770:
1867:(that page is on my watchlist while I'm looking forward to a decision in that ArbCom case). --
1856:
1832:
1596:
1553:
1431:
1427:
576:
Recently many facts have been added that sound scary in the context of this article, but does
538:
272:
224:
102:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1503:
1403:
1059:
856:
711:
354:
2098:
1945:
What does this has to do w/ the existance right of Israel? Could you develop your idea? --
1908:
1747:
722:
216:
74:
2062:
1645:
1381:
1162:
1123:
912:
831:
123:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid_(second_nomination)
2163:
2139:
2122:
1880:
1623:
I do not agree with your assessment, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. --
1031:
950:
738:
692:
598:
287:
This is the second AfD, and it wasn't deleted last time. Plus, it's in arbitration. --
1904:
587:
Could one of the "keep" voters please explain, succinctly, what this article is about?
1985:
1947:
1776:
1706:
1676:
1557:
1527:
1435:
1103:
813:
801:
543:
520:
449:
419:
388:
373:
346:
236:
204:
187:
153:
573:
current practices to apartheid or say that Israel might some day practice apartheid.
1723:
1541:
1471:
995:
654:
334:
324:. Fair and balanced, with citations and references, both sides having their say...
175:
1913:
not a paper encyclopedia and can thus accommodate items that would not fit in one.
791:
the argument that Israel is an "apartheid state" rather than an article trying to
562:
Under its original title it was defended as being an article about the political
1735:
1600:
1595:
The second nomination was a purposeful disruption by a strawman sockpuppet (see
1509:
1079:
848:
705:
508:
444:
If the current article seems to be infected with POV, the proper recourse is to
350:
276:
258:
1070:
propaganda. Pertinent details on these allegations are already in the article
2025:
In which case the correct course of action would be merging, not deleting. --
1642:
827:
674:
606:
407:
393:
288:
2151:
2013:
2000:
1976:
1961:
1933:
1561:
1415:
1310:
1197:
465:
82:
847:. "Apartheid" is just a more pejorative rhetoric term for "Segregation". --
537:*sigh*, not again! POV problems can be fixed. At least the title isn't at "
322:
Allegations of Palestinian babies being used in traditional Jewish cat food
2162:. If this gets merged with other articles, information might get lost. --
1322:(or something like that) would be a very usefull alternative approach. --
2050:
1750:
602:
203:
Sometimes I think all Israel related articles are one, big POV fork...
1928:. This article is an attack on the legitimacy of the very existance of
610:
1932:. It's a disgrace to Knowledge (XXG) and to the article's supporters.
1641:
deleting articles on genuine contraversial issues is not the WP way --
185:
Thanks for the info. I thought Bots are diff than regular users ;) --
1980:
1929:
1359:
878:, if someone claims that Muhammad's wife was under 18, do we get
2179:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Israeli apartheid (phrase)
99:
Delete - Stinks of POV, useless, non encyclopedic, propagadna...
1414:. I do not endorse them, but the allegations are often made. --
1008:
Talk:Israeli_apartheid/RS#Reliable_sources:_scholary_articles
882:? Don't think so...and yes, both allegations have been made.
1734:
The allegations have been made by reputable notable people.
1354:. The info can fit very well into related articles, such as
1979:. It should be rather an "attack on the legitimacy" of the
1010:), so rewrite is in order under title that is in line with
1762:
Could you be more precise? I may understand that you mean
2073:
as per Carl and strong suspicion of bad faith AfD nom. --
721:
POV title, and it only gets worse. Someone needs to read
1233:
Hi, this was your first edit. Did you forget to log in?
2107:
1700:
1670:
1263:
67:
2109:). I've asked for this deletion vote to be closed. --
1771:
1767:
1763:
1552:. As per Ian Pitchford, I'd also support renaming to
1891:. Knowledge (XXG) is not a platform for propaganda.
1692:
This entry should be kept and should be developed...
1350:
WP doesn't need this article any more than it needs
647:
Delete, and merge any true human rights issues into
1006:Although lacks available scholary information (see
752:, This article should have been deleted long ago.-
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1861:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (common names)
1804:tarnishes my credibility if I do choose to vote.
1098:The problem with this assessment is that there's
2189:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1766:. Other people may understand that you refer to
994:article, there's a lot that comes to mind. . .
1863:. For clarity, I learnt about this vote from
1523:Immigrant deaths along the U.S.-Mexico border
8:
1859:again, for the reasons given above, and per
1352:Allegations of Jews drinking Christian blood
1058:Significant way of framing the controversy.
691:, because that article is too long already.
593:operational criteria. (Yes, a definition of
880:Allegations of Muhammad's child molestation
1746:- those who vote to keep are violating of
1379:comparisons to South African apartheid. -
476:Just a little too much of a POV powder keg
1305:"merge" (if any) probably should be into
1148:Just to give three of the sources... --
66:The nomination was also misformatted by
318:Allegations of of Ehud Olmert being gay
1975:Noon, you mean the regime and not the
754:Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg
257:ought to dedicate an article to it. -
77:is likely to be reached at this stage.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1430:. As legitimate and encyclopedic as
507:Way too much POV to ever be NPOV. --
911:der jossi. This is an attack page.
1046:per Avi and/or Kim van der Linde.
876:Allegations of Clinton's communism
367:Indeed, nobody talks about adding
52:The entry is currently subject to
24:
1072:Apartheid_outside_of_South_Africa
147:but i am sorry to say that it is
2136:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources
2099:WP:DEL#Abuse of deletion process
1295:title, see my comment above. --
93:Allegations of Israeli apartheid
1521:phrase. I also heard it in the
787:if this is actually an article
371:in front of Islamofascism. --
219:. The title of the article is "
217:Knowledge (XXG) is not censored
1:
1764:WP is not a file storage area
1320:Zionism-apartheid comparison
2172:21:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2155:20:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2143:19:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2126:18:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2114:18:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2090:18:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2078:18:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2066:18:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2054:17:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2030:18:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2017:17:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2004:17:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1989:18:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1965:17:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1951:17:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1937:16:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1921:15:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1896:14:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1884:12:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1872:08:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1848:04:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1836:23:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1824:21:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1809:21:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1797:21:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1780:21:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1754:18:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1739:14:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1727:14:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1710:15:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1680:15:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1661:13:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1649:12:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1628:20:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1615:20:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1587:12:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1575:11:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1545:10:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1531:11:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1513:10:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1484:09:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1455:06:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1443:06:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1419:06:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1407:06:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1395:05:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1371:03:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1327:16:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1314:15:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1300:06:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1270:06:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1262:Kim, you've said yourself (
1238:06:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1205:05:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1192:14:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1168:06:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1153:04:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1129:04:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1107:03:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1094:03:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1063:03:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1051:02:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1035:01:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1023:21:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
999:01:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
986:00:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
974:00:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
874:Moscow, do we get to start
640:19:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
86:21:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
2206:
1855:, I'd support renaming to
1030:, agee with the others. --
954:23:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
942:23:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
930:23:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
918:23:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
904:22:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
887:22:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
866:20:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
840:20:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
819:19:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
805:19:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
780:19:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
768:. propaganda buzzword. --
761:19:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
745:19:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
730:18:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
714:18:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
696:16:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
680:15:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
658:13:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
618:06:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
548:03:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
530:01:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
512:00:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
469:23:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
453:22:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
437:20:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
423:22:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
411:19:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
397:19:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
377:16:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
361:16:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
338:16:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
305:06:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
292:15:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
280:14:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
262:14:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
252:14:09, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
240:13:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
228:13:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
208:11:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
191:11:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
179:11:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
157:11:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
106:08:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
1356:Israeli West Bank barrier
1172:Maybe read those sources
1076:Israeli West Bank barrier
812:Per Su-Laine and others.
737:, we had this already. --
668:merge the NPOV bits into
387:- The difference is that
112:See previous AfD debates:
2182:Please do not modify it.
170:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
1772:that WP is not censored
635:would work for me too.
59:The nomination appears
689:Human rights in Israel
670:Human rights in Israel
649:Human rights in Israel
629:Human Rights in Israel
498:) 00:19, 9 August 2006
1768:an original invention
1517:I really dislike the
2087:Jerry G. Sweeton Jr.
1479:Israel-bashing bait
723:WP:WTA#Article_title
174:. It is listed now.
1831:per Bertilvidet. --
937:per Carlossuarez46
125:from July 15, 2006.
1671:Anon's second edit
1481:Kuratowski's Ghost
1307:Zionism and racism
1042:per Svest and RJH
773:
633:Zionism and Racism
595:crime of apartheid
526:£€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€
235:per IslaySolomon.
151:encyclopaedic. --
1857:Israeli apartheid
1703:
1701:User's first edit
1673:
1597:User:SoCalJustice
1554:Israeli apartheid
1432:New anti-Semitism
1428:Israeli apartheid
1393:
1324:Kim van der Linde
1297:Kim van der Linde
1189:Kim van der Linde
1150:Kim van der Linde
1020:Kim van der Linde
1016:Kim van der Linde
983:His Excellency...
949:per johnny cash.
862:
838:
769:
539:Israeli apartheid
527:
500:
486:comment added by
163:
119:from May 29, 2006
2197:
2184:
1869:Francis Schonken
1699:
1669:
1612:
1609:
1606:
1603:
1571:
1570:
1540:per Khoikhoi. --
1508:
1502:
1489:Very Strong Keep
1385:
1368:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
971:
965:
861:
858:
854:
830:
816:
708:
546:
525:
499:
480:
160:
44:Closed early as
34:
2205:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2187:deletion review
2180:
1918::) Dlohcierekim
1806::) Dlohcierekim
1794::) Dlohcierekim
1610:
1607:
1604:
1601:
1573:
1568:
1567:
1506:
1500:
1452:Evolver of Borg
1364:
1089:
1086:
1083:
1080:
969:
963:
927:fullsome prison
863:
859:
852:
814:
778:
706:
542:
519:per Leifern. --
481:
96:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2203:
2201:
2192:
2191:
2175:
2174:
2157:
2145:
2128:
2116:
2092:
2080:
2068:
2056:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2020:
2019:
2007:
2006:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1968:
1967:
1955:
1954:
1940:
1939:
1923:
1898:
1886:
1874:
1850:
1838:
1826:
1812:
1811:
1800:
1799:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1757:
1756:
1741:
1729:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1694:
1693:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1664:
1663:
1651:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1618:
1617:
1590:
1589:
1577:
1565:
1547:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1486:
1474:
1457:
1445:
1421:
1409:
1397:
1373:
1362:. POV fork. --
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1194:
1182:Glasier 2003:
1180:
1175:Glasier 2003:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1138:
1132:
1131:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1065:
1053:
1037:
1025:
1001:
988:
976:
956:
944:
932:
920:
906:
889:
884:Carlossuarez46
868:
857:
842:
821:
807:
782:
774:
763:
747:
732:
716:
698:
682:
660:
643:
642:
621:
620:
599:discrimination
589:
588:
584:
583:
582:
581:
574:
567:
557:
556:
550:
541:" anymore... —
532:
514:
488:205.157.110.11
478:
477:
471:
455:
439:
432:per Leifern. ←
426:
425:
413:
400:
399:
381:
380:
364:
363:
340:
328:
310:
309:
308:
307:
295:
294:
282:
266:
265:
264:
242:
230:
210:
197:
196:
195:
194:
182:
181:
165:
164:
129:
128:
127:
126:
120:
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
78:
71:
64:
61:out of process
57:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2202:
2190:
2188:
2183:
2177:
2176:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2158:
2156:
2153:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2137:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2120:
2117:
2115:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2097:. Please see
2096:
2093:
2091:
2088:
2084:
2083:Strong Delete
2081:
2079:
2076:
2072:
2069:
2067:
2064:
2060:
2057:
2055:
2052:
2048:
2045:
2044:
2031:
2028:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2018:
2015:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2005:
2002:
1997:
1996:
1991:
1990:
1987:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1966:
1963:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1953:
1952:
1949:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1924:
1922:
1919:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1905:Verifiability
1902:
1899:
1897:
1894:
1890:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1878:
1875:
1873:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1851:
1849:
1846:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1834:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1817:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1807:
1802:
1801:
1798:
1795:
1791:
1788:
1787:
1782:
1781:
1778:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1755:
1752:
1749:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1733:
1730:
1728:
1725:
1721:
1718:
1717:
1712:
1711:
1708:
1702:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1682:
1681:
1678:
1672:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1662:
1659:
1658:217.91.40.148
1655:
1652:
1650:
1647:
1644:
1640:
1637:
1636:
1629:
1626:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1616:
1613:
1598:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1588:
1585:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1572:
1569:Contributions
1563:
1559:
1558:Islamofascism
1555:
1551:
1548:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1536:
1532:
1529:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1511:
1505:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1482:
1478:
1477:Strong Delete
1475:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1444:
1441:
1440:Ian Pitchford
1437:
1436:Islamofascism
1433:
1429:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1405:
1401:
1398:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1377:
1376:Strong Delete
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1366:Chodorkovskiy
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1328:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1298:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1239:
1236:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1206:
1203:
1202:62.156.190.36
1199:
1195:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1181:
1179:
1174:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1159:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1108:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1092:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
992:
989:
987:
984:
980:
977:
975:
972:
966:
960:
957:
955:
952:
948:
945:
943:
940:
936:
933:
931:
928:
924:
921:
919:
916:
914:
910:
907:
905:
902:
901:
897:
893:
890:
888:
885:
881:
877:
872:
869:
867:
864:
855:
851:
846:
843:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
822:
820:
817:
811:
808:
806:
803:
798:
794:
790:
786:
783:
781:
777:
772:
767:
764:
762:
759:
755:
751:
748:
746:
743:
740:
736:
733:
731:
728:
727:FeloniousMonk
724:
720:
717:
715:
712:
710:
709:
702:
699:
697:
694:
690:
686:
683:
681:
678:
677:
672:
671:
665:
661:
659:
656:
651:
650:
645:
644:
641:
638:
634:
630:
626:
623:
622:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
591:
590:
586:
585:
579:
575:
572:
568:
565:
561:
560:
559:
558:
554:
551:
549:
545:
540:
536:
533:
531:
528:
522:
518:
515:
513:
510:
506:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
475:
472:
470:
467:
463:
459:
456:
454:
451:
447:
443:
440:
438:
435:
434:Humus sapiens
431:
428:
427:
424:
421:
417:
414:
412:
409:
405:
402:
401:
398:
395:
390:
389:Islamofascism
386:
383:
382:
379:
378:
375:
370:
366:
365:
362:
358:
357:
352:
348:
347:Islamofascism
344:
341:
339:
336:
332:
329:
327:
326:84.238.25.152
323:
319:
315:
312:
311:
306:
303:
299:
298:
297:
296:
293:
290:
286:
283:
281:
278:
274:
270:
267:
263:
260:
255:
254:
253:
250:
249:wikipediatrix
246:
243:
241:
238:
234:
231:
229:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
209:
206:
202:
199:
198:
193:
192:
189:
184:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
168:
167:
166:
162:
159:
158:
155:
150:
146:
143:as it may be
142:
138:
134:
131:
130:
124:
121:
118:
115:
114:
113:
110:
109:
108:
107:
104:
100:
94:
91:
87:
84:
81:
80:
76:
72:
69:
65:
62:
58:
55:
51:
50:
49:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2181:
2178:
2159:
2147:
2130:
2118:
2102:
2094:
2085:per above.
2082:
2070:
2058:
2046:
1984:
1946:
1925:
1912:
1900:
1888:
1876:
1852:
1840:
1833:DieWeibeRose
1828:
1815:
1789:
1775:
1774:. Cheers --
1743:
1731:
1719:
1705:
1689:
1675:
1653:
1638:
1579:
1549:
1537:
1518:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1476:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1447:
1423:
1411:
1399:
1382:CrazyRussian
1380:
1375:
1365:
1347:
1267:Su-Laine Yeo
1235:Su-Laine Yeo
1183:
1176:
1157:
1099:
1074:and also in
1067:
1055:
1043:
1039:
1027:
1003:
990:
978:
958:
946:
934:
922:
908:
899:
891:
870:
849:
844:
823:
809:
796:
792:
788:
784:
765:
749:
734:
718:
704:
700:
684:
675:
667:
664:blood libels
646:
637:Su-Laine Yeo
624:
615:Su-Laine Yeo
577:
570:
563:
552:
534:
516:
504:
482:— Preceding
479:
473:
461:
457:
445:
441:
429:
415:
403:
384:
372:
368:
355:
342:
330:
313:
302:Su-Laine Yeo
284:
273:IslaySolomon
268:
244:
232:
225:IslaySolomon
220:
212:
200:
186:
152:
148:
144:
140:
139:, it may be
137:stink of POV
136:
132:
111:
103:Haham hanuka
98:
97:
48:, because:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
2119:Strong Keep
2095:Speedy keep
2071:Strong Keep
2063:Carl Kenner
1625:Ben Houston
1584:Ben Houston
1404:Bertilvidet
1358:and, well,
1060:Fred Bauder
894:per jossi.
369:allegations
221:Allegations
54:arbitration
1722:POV fork.
1656:per nom --
1163:SlimVirgin
1124:SlimVirgin
913:SlimVirgin
828:≈ jossi ≈
607:war crimes
446:correct it
316:How about
289:John Nagle
172:incomplete
145:propaganda
2164:Dissident
2140:JWSchmidt
2123:WAS 4.250
1983:than. --
1977:statehood
1881:Gatoclass
1426:. Rename
1198:Uri Davis
1032:Daniel575
951:ReverendG
939:abakharev
693:Sandstein
75:consensus
68:nominator
2075:Strothra
1911:. WP is
1770:or even
1528:Medico80
1104:CJCurrie
1044:or merge
1012:WP:TTILE
815:IronDuke
802:GabrielF
793:advocate
603:genocide
544:Khoikhoi
521:PinchasC
496:contribs
484:unsigned
460:or else
450:CJCurrie
420:CJCurrie
237:BoojiBoy
205:Medico80
149:soo very
1901:Comment
1845:Shamir1
1724:Ayinyud
1542:Yakudza
1519:SoFixIt
1504:sofixit
1495:or the
1493:concept
1472:Liftarn
1348:Delete.
1100:a tonne
996:RolandR
797:advance
631:and/or
611:torture
571:compare
416:Comment
404:Comment
335:Leifern
314:Comment
176:DumbBOT
141:useless
2111:ChrisO
2047:Delete
2027:ChrisO
1986:Szvest
1981:regime
1948:Szvest
1930:Israel
1926:Delete
1916:story.
1909:WP:NOT
1893:Pecher
1889:Delete
1841:Delete
1777:Szvest
1748:WP:Not
1744:Delete
1736:Arniep
1720:Delete
1707:Szvest
1677:Szvest
1654:Delete
1510:Loom91
1468:Rename
1448:Delete
1360:Israel
1185:1992).
1068:Delete
1028:Delete
935:Delete
909:Delete
892:Delete
871:Delete
845:Delete
824:Delete
810:Delete
785:Delete
766:Delete
750:Delete
739:tickle
735:Delete
719:Delete
707:Tewfik
701:Delete
578:anyone
553:Delete
517:Delete
509:Wafulz
505:Delete
474:Delete
458:Delete
430:Delete
385:Delete
374:Szvest
331:Delete
277:makomk
259:makomk
245:Delete
201:Delete
188:Szvest
154:Szvest
1643:BozMo
1464:Merge
1391:email
964:LotLE
853:eptor
789:about
776:deeds
685:Keep.
676:Where
673:. --
627:into
625:Merge
462:merge
408:PresN
394:PresN
16:<
2168:Talk
2160:Keep
2152:Ezeu
2148:Note
2131:keep
2059:Keep
2014:6SJ7
2001:Ezeu
1962:Noon
1934:Noon
1877:Keep
1853:Keep
1829:Keep
1816:Keep
1790:Keep
1732:Keep
1690:Keep
1646:talk
1639:Keep
1580:Keep
1550:Keep
1538:Keep
1497:term
1460:Keep
1438:. --
1434:and
1424:Keep
1416:Ezeu
1412:Keep
1400:Keep
1387:talk
1311:6SJ7
1158:None
1056:Keep
1048:heqs
1040:Keep
1004:Keep
991:Keep
979:Keep
970:talk
959:Keep
947:Keep
923:Keep
896:AnnH
860:talk
771:tasc
758:Talk
564:term
535:Keep
492:talk
466:6SJ7
442:Keep
356:talk
343:Keep
285:Keep
271:per
269:Keep
233:Keep
213:Keep
133:Keep
83:El_C
2051:HGB
1821:CBD
1751:Zeq
1704:--
1674:--
1611:el
1562:Ted
1466:or
1187:--
1090:el
795:or
655:Avi
609:or
605:or
601:or
351:RJH
320:or
73:No
2170:)
2101::
1999:--
1608:er
1507:}}
1501:{{
1462:,
1450:.
1087:er
834:•
756:|
742:me
725:.
523:|
494:•
392:--
359:)
275:-
101:--
2166:(
1605:P
1602:M
1564:/
1389:/
1084:P
1081:M
967:×
900:♫
850:H
836:@
832:t
490:(
353:(
70:.
63:.
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.