159:
88:
83:
92:
462:
per
Knowledge guidelines. While editor consensus should ultimately determine whether or not the split is warranted, I don't believe it should be deleted at this time. I would also humbly suggest that the nominating editor
75:
381:
Based on your clarification I withdraw my !vote. I find it very strange, to say the least, that the nominator didn't mention the revert. The fact that you are a newcomer that made a bold edit is no reason for deletion.
424:
as a very bad and blatant POV fork attempt. Having this as a standalone article gives way too much weight to a fringe criticism, work the subject matter back into the parent article and condense as necessary.
153:
79:
71:
63:
115:
310:
174:
259:
141:
544:
527:
510:
493:
476:
448:
434:
416:
391:
376:
362:
343:
325:
299:
284:
273:
249:
233:
203:
57:
135:
191:
131:
181:
120:
367:
That was exactly the idea. A huge article was split in two. And I requested someone savvy to write a summary section in the parent article.
245:
535:. I find the article helpful and to the point, on a stand alone basis, and as such will encourage other users to expand the contents.
353:
This article may make sense if turned into a sub article of the original article, and the original article changed to summary style.
147:
17:
518:
Good faith is not the issue here. Reading its title, this article doesn't bring anything more than a potential pov-fork.
439:
If you see fringe criticsm, just delete it. But there are quite a few separate "Criticism" articles in wikipedia.
559:
36:
558:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
217:
472:
468:
444:
412:
372:
229:
53:
195:
523:
387:
358:
199:
167:
506:
489:
540:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
267:
440:
408:
368:
339:
321:
295:
225:
49:
519:
459:
430:
383:
354:
502:
485:
464:
536:
109:
458:. I believe that the article creator acted in good faith by boldly splitting an
335:
317:
291:
426:
220:, but the split in the original article was reverted, thus creating an
190:
This page was created by a newcomer from text cut & pasted from
552:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
403:. A very much legit splitting of a clearly defined topic from a
467:, particularly on heated topics relating to Israel/Palestine.
240:
Fixing malformatted nom; nominator hardcoded it into the log.
105:
101:
97:
166:
72:
Alleged United
Nations bias in Israel-Palestine issues
64:
Alleged United
Nations bias in Israel-Palestine issues
407:
parent article per "summary style" mentioned above.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
562:). No further edits should be made to this page.
311:list of Palestine-related deletion discussions
216:. I created it by splitting a big article per
260:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
180:
8:
285:list of Israel-related deletion discussions
305:
279:
254:
334:BOLD FORKing. Undecided at this point. --
309:: This debate has been included in the
283:: This debate has been included in the
258:: This debate has been included in the
192:Israel, Palestine and the United Nations
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
545:10:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
58:14:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
528:22:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
511:03:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
494:21:07, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
477:22:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
449:18:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
435:18:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
417:16:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
392:09:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
377:16:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
363:07:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
344:06:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
326:06:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
300:06:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
274:04:53, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
250:02:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
234:22:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
204:00:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
579:
555:Please do not modify it.
210:Comment from the creator
32:Please do not modify it.
218:wikipedia:Summary style
194:, without discussion.
484:Per Uncle Dick. -
248:and a clue-bat •
44:The result was
501:Per Uncle Dick.
465:assume good faith
328:
314:
302:
288:
276:
263:
570:
557:
460:oversize article
315:
289:
270:
264:
243:
242:Ten Pound Hammer
222:illusion of fork
212:This article is
185:
184:
170:
123:
113:
95:
34:
578:
577:
573:
572:
571:
569:
568:
567:
566:
560:deletion review
553:
352:
268:
241:
127:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
576:
574:
565:
564:
548:
547:
530:
513:
496:
479:
453:
452:
451:
419:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
348:
346:
329:
303:
277:
252:
237:
236:
188:
187:
124:
121:Afd statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
575:
563:
561:
556:
550:
549:
546:
542:
538:
534:
531:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
512:
508:
504:
500:
497:
495:
491:
487:
483:
480:
478:
474:
470:
466:
461:
457:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
432:
428:
423:
420:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
351:
347:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
327:
323:
319:
312:
308:
304:
301:
297:
293:
286:
282:
278:
275:
272:
271:
261:
257:
253:
251:
247:
239:
238:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
554:
551:
532:
515:
498:
481:
455:
421:
404:
400:
349:
331:
306:
280:
266:
255:
221:
213:
209:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
45:
43:
31:
28:
350:Weak delete
269:Jujutacular
154:free images
469:Uncle Dick
441:Yceren Loq
409:Yceren Loq
369:Yceren Loq
246:his otters
226:Yceren Loq
214:not a fork
50:Mike Cline
520:Noisetier
384:Marokwitz
355:Marokwitz
196:Emmanuelm
503:JuJubird
486:Ret.Prof
116:View log
537:Davshul
332:Comment
160:WP refs
148:scholar
89:protect
84:history
516:Delete
422:Delete
132:Google
93:delete
482:Keep:
336:Shuki
318:Shuki
292:Shuki
175:JSTOR
136:books
118:) •
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
541:talk
533:Keep
524:talk
507:talk
499:Keep
490:talk
473:talk
456:Keep
445:talk
431:talk
427:Tarc
413:talk
405:HUGE
401:Keep
388:talk
373:talk
359:talk
340:talk
322:talk
307:Note
296:talk
281:Note
256:Note
230:talk
200:talk
168:FENS
142:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
48:. --
46:Keep
265:--
224:.
182:TWL
114:– (
543:)
526:)
509:)
492:)
475:)
447:)
433:)
415:)
390:)
375:)
361:)
342:)
324:)
313:.
298:)
287:.
262:.
244:,
232:)
202:)
162:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
539:(
522:(
505:(
488:(
471:(
443:(
429:(
411:(
386:(
371:(
357:(
338:(
320:(
316:—
294:(
290:—
228:(
198:(
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.