431:
reliably published may be used in
Knowledge (XXG); but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source. Do not analyze, synthesize, interpret, or evaluate material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so. Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them. Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Knowledge (XXG) a primary source of that material. Use extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which is policy." I have not interpreted primary source material. Another thing, the articles you removed like Vice are so far from a self published blog with no editorial oversight it's very clear you didn't even bother to learn about the institution.
1225:, "Questionable sources are generally unsuitable for citing contentious claims about third parties, which includes claims against institutions, persons living or dead, as well as more ill-defined entities. The proper uses of a questionable source are very limited." I am in no way making any such claim with those references. Also, there are two Billboard references, and some of them are not just a mention. The song has also managed to chart, which does put points in it's favor for meeting the
1777:
those sources. Your phrasing implies the entire article is a biased and poorly constructed affair based entirely off of these. The "sales website" is Amazon, only for release date, which I have added citations from the publishing company detailing its release schedule. I'm not even going to bother saying anything else. If you have a different paradigm from what the guidelines say than from me, fine. I just hope more people have my view.
1221:. It has received significant coverage from multiple sources, they come from reliable sources with integrity, the content for most of the article is based on secondary sources, and they are independent of the subject. Moving on, The Youtube/Soundcloud references are for very specific things, like release dates and labels. Not information that can be biased or obfuscated. As quoted directly from
407:. She (1) "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself." See references 1,2, and 3 for a start. (2) She has had a single on Canada's hot 100. She meets two of the criteria for musicians, and only one is required. ~
2232:- Allie X, her album, and single have received significant coverage in reliable sources and thus are notable. (Note that the album come out next week, so much of the coverage is within the last week.) These nominations seem to have been a huge waste of time as notability is not remotely borderline. Given the desire to discount even a 1000 word
531:. So two are trivial brief mentions and the third goes to an error page sort of like a dead link. Not sure what the problem is there with archive.org and stickymag. The VICE reference a user refers to above goes to a blog type site with no editorial oversight. They contract out to freelancers for their content and have no editorial oversight.
2134:
I think it should be kept, but I can see how it may not necessarily meet all the criteria for NALBUMS and may need to be merged until it becomes more popular to better satisfy the criteria (if it even does.) But under no circumstance do I think it should be just obliterated as he wants. And it wasn't
1304:
I don't know if you are busy or what but please take the time to read and understand what I am saying. I only disclosed I created the article. I am in no way affiliated with the sources of any of the content or the subject. I am incredibly frustrated I did the right thing and am being reprimanded for
1250:
There is no requirement that the person doing a nomination for deletion to " have a vested interest and are a major contributor to an article." Please redact your personal attack, "No need to be a snob" It is inappropriate to attack the nominator. Also please comment on the content not the editors or
1229:
criteria. There is another interview from Radio.com conducted by
Courtney E. Smith. I've further updated the article with even more interviews cited. If you have a problem with a few minor references like the Youtube for publication date, a request for reliable citation should be made, not requesting
1776:
I would really like to ask. When you make these nominations are you actually reviewing what content on the article was taken from the sources you're frowning on? Those are general guidelines. The content taken from those sources are minimal and don't seem to fail the criteria for why you cannot use
430:
You are not acting in accordance to wikipedia policy. I tried to act in good faith now, but you very clearly are either not reading the article or you can't follow guidelines. On primary sources, this is what the guidelines say "Unless restricted by another policy, primary sources that have been
1886:
I apologoize again. Anyway, even though I don't agree that these sources are incorrect (and there are no fan postings on blogs, I have no idea what you are talking about there; sorry) I have gone on and removed all of the objectionable content, as they were only extra references, save for the
1484:
There's not a page for "all of her recordings." There's 3 pages for her. 3. One for her, her first major label release, and her only charting single. That's nominal. I did my best not to include anything that has little to nothing to mention. And again, there's alternatives to the
1148:: I have no idea how my article is not notable. Obviously large institutions like Billboard and TIME think it's notable enough to mention her and her single multiple times. Also aren't you supposed to fully explain how it violates the policies? I don't really see that you did that.
1937:
Thank you for edifying. I removed it and tidied other references. On the Catch article as well. Though I would like to ask, why is that not ok? That is a primary source I used to indicate who the producers were on a song. This is from Allie X herself. The
1190:. The references include mentions at the time reference and billboard reference. Also there are links as references to sales sites of itunes and amazon. Other references are youtube and sound cloud. None of these have significant coverage from
1311:
I have removed the objected content as it was not essential to the article; only the "mentions" remain as they are used only as direct quotations as they are reviewing the song in question. When you have time please review the article
1012:
2181:
I did read that. I would've never contested any of this or made these articles in the first place if I thought it was against the policy. I don't know if you were trying to be helpful or rude so I will leave it at that.
1282:
interest in the article and was chastised for doing so. I never, ever said you had any relation to the article. Again, I don't see how any of the information doesn't follow protocols. I suppose we will just wait and
807:: Substantial references in mainstream music media including Time and major article in Billboard. If a 1000+ word profile in Billboard doesn't make you notable enough for Knowledge (XXG), I'm not sure what does.
1719:
1815:
1080:
558:
article is a "brief mention"?!?!?! It's 1,083 words, and she is the subject of the article! It's not like she is briefly mentioned in passing in an article about someone else, the article is 3 pages of text
261:
609:
because the GNG specifically states "or or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right." These guidelines are ones people continuously have told you, known as the
1446:) yet. This seems to be a trend with marginally-notable musicians: creating individual articles about them and all their recordings, in the apparent hope that something will survive AfD. I hope it's
1863:
when nominating an article for deletion. I always review and read the article and all the cited "sources". The problems with the cited "sources" are included in the nomination rationale above.
340:
2043:
1401:
481:
1835:
1100:
1213:@WordSeventeen I realize I do not "own" the article, but you are supposed to identify that you have a vested interest and are a major contributor to an article. Sorry you misunderstood.
1971:
1341:
965:
838:
did not receive as much input. It's important for these discussions to also be taken into consideration at the time this newly-bundled discussion is closed. See below for reference.
831:
762:
375:
1006:
1750:
Non-notable studio EP by non-notable singer. References include brief mentions, sales websites, celebrity twitter messages and status, blog posts from fans. This article fails
214:
320:
1795:
1713:
1060:
1887:
mentions as they are only used for reviews and are direct quotations. The link to the music video still remains. When you have time, please review the article again.
2003:. Single charted on the Canadian hot 100, and album/single/and artist have all been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works in major magazines like
255:
1975:
1672:
1345:
835:
379:
1123:: I really can't see why this article should be deleted or merged. There's already sources cited in the article that gives the song significant coverage, per
518:
2037:
1395:
1251:
nominator. I have no COI, in fact I have no relationship or ties to this non-notable singer or her non-notable debut single. Perhaps it is just too soon.
475:
972:
515:
938:
933:
517:
goes to an archive.org site with an error message "Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_ in /home/stickyma/domains/stickymagazine.com". This reference #2
141:
136:
667:
the other two. Too soon for separate articles; if we had separate articles for every song which ever charted, we'd have no room for anything else.
942:
145:
1679:
671:
overrides subject-specific guidelines, which are intended to be used with common sense, and there's a lot of source overlap in these articles.
925:
128:
221:
567:
article; yes, it's a lot shorter at just 2 paragraphs and 148 words, but it's still a non-trivial mention for a major newsmagazine like
2259:#2 by having a verifiable hit on a national music chart. The article could do with a serious copyedit, but deletion is not the answer.
1027:
994:
17:
2267:
460:
2135:
in anyway intended to be a publicity blitz, I just wanted to try my hand at making articles as these are the first I ever have.
1645:
1640:
187:
182:
2154:
1649:
191:
1915:
1912:
1602:
895:
53:
1734:
988:
816:
1907:
This is the blog/fan post and either a primary source or fansite I refer to. Whichever it is is it, is definitely not a
1701:
1632:
174:
2304:
2214:
1583:
1543:
876:
40:
276:
95:
90:
2093:
1447:
984:
243:
99:
929:
132:
1034:
82:
2236:
article, this is eitehr an epic misunderstanding of
Knowledge (XXG) guidelines or a bad faith nomination. --
1695:
2047:
1922:
1868:
1763:
1405:
1373:. It's been ranked on the Canadian hot 100 and the article cites multiple non-trivial published sources. ~
1260:
1201:
1048:
644:
539:
485:
308:
1186:. As you mentioned above th time and billboard references are just mentions. Article subject fails to met
448:
237:
2300:
2210:
2041:
1691:
1579:
1539:
1399:
872:
840:
479:
36:
2052:
1410:
1214:
830:– Note that despite it being closed procedurally per being bundled here, up to the time it was closed,
786:
730:
700:
660:
490:
436:
404:
1000:
532:
2265:
2187:
2167:
2140:
2106:
2089:
2005:
1947:
1892:
1782:
1498:
1460:
1317:
1291:
1235:
1153:
921:
913:
758:
681:
623:
456:
124:
2081:
2000:
1755:
1754:. The EP was "released physically on April 7, 2015" but today is 6 April 2015? This is really just
1443:
1252:
1195:
738:
442:
233:
2241:
2039:
1741:
1727:
1397:
1020:
477:
269:
2286:
2269:
2256:
2245:
2191:
2176:
2144:
2115:
2068:
2028:
2024:
1991:
1987:
1951:
1896:
1872:
1860:
1847:
1827:
1807:
1786:
1767:
1614:
1596:
1524:
1513:
1502:
1469:
1426:
1386:
1382:
1361:
1357:
1321:
1295:
1264:
1239:
1226:
1205:
1174:
1157:
1140:
1128:
1112:
1092:
1072:
1052:
907:
889:
844:
820:
798:
749:
734:
716:
712:
690:
648:
636:
627:
615:
584:
580:
543:
506:
464:
420:
416:
395:
391:
352:
332:
312:
297:
64:
1961:
1918:
1864:
1759:
1331:
1256:
1197:
1136:
1044:
794:
699:
Re: the "we'd have no room for anything else" argument, may I remind you that
Knowledge (XXG) is
640:
600:
535:
435:
I also cannot even fathom what kind of issue you had with a archived, broadcast radio interview.
365:
304:
58:
1370:
283:
1843:
1823:
1803:
1572:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1108:
1088:
1068:
865:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
812:
348:
328:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
2299:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2209:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1942:
just says not to interpret and to use caution when using primary sources. Why was that wrong?
1578:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1538:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
871:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2279:
1636:
1170:
777:
178:
1856:
1751:
1490:
1486:
1439:
1218:
1187:
1183:
1124:
668:
611:
606:
528:
521:
439:
293:
2260:
2183:
2158:
2136:
2129:
2097:
2045:
2011:
1943:
1888:
1778:
1494:
1479:
1451:
1403:
1313:
1287:
1231:
1149:
672:
619:
483:
452:
1939:
1913:
http://alliexandra.com/post/114330875910/which-one-of-the-producers-including-yourself-in
1908:
1707:
1222:
1191:
2237:
2056:
2017:
1980:
1414:
1375:
1350:
1278:
I don't see how you still managed to misconstrue my meaning. I had a right to identify
705:
573:
494:
409:
384:
301:
1132:
790:
249:
2049:
1407:
487:
1839:
1819:
1799:
1104:
1084:
1064:
808:
344:
324:
86:
1666:
959:
208:
162:
116:
1628:
1620:
1166:
766:
170:
563:! That's really a decent length feature article for a magazine. As for the
525:
771:
1194:. The only one that might be considered significant is the interview at
2085:
2077:
1435:
782:
656:
78:
70:
769:, per the non-trivial sources in that article, including reviews from
1966:
you probably should have bundled all three of these AFDs together.
1336:
you probably should have bundled all three of these AFDs together.
781:, as well the sources talking about the songs from the album. Keep
527:
is also just a brief mention, not significant coverage, also fails
370:
you probably should have bundled all three of these AFDs together.
52:. Also considered the consensus in the formerly seperated AfDs. (
2293:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2203:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1532:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
605:
Archive.org error fixed. Also, it doesn't matter if it failed
432:
1816:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
1081:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
1165:
If found non-notable, should redirect to the album its on.
1972:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Catch (Allie X song)
1342:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Catch (Allie X song)
855:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Catch (Allie X song)
832:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Catch (Allie X song)
763:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Catch (Allie X song)
376:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Catch (Allie X song)
725:
I have since bundled all three related AfDs, and I !vote
1438:. Although the song has charted, I don't see it meeting
341:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
1662:
1658:
1654:
955:
951:
947:
204:
200:
196:
158:
154:
150:
112:
108:
104:
1726:
1019:
268:
1836:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
1101:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
1740:
1033:
520:is a brief mention not significant coverage. Fails
282:
1976:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/CollXtion I
1586:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1562:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/CollXtion I
1346:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/CollXtion I
879:). No further edits should be made to this page.
836:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/CollXtion I
380:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/CollXtion I
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2307:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2217:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1546:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1217:. I fail to see in any way how it does not meet
1043:Non-notable debut single by non-notable singer.
834:had an overall consensus for article retention.
1182:@Sanctuary, it is not your article. Please see
2092:(both of which are also at AfD). Looks like a
1968:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Allie X
1338:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Allie X
372:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Allie X
8:
1834:Note: This debate has been included in the
1814:Note: This debate has been included in the
1794:Note: This debate has been included in the
1099:Note: This debate has been included in the
1079:Note: This debate has been included in the
1059:Note: This debate has been included in the
339:Note: This debate has been included in the
321:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
319:Note: This debate has been included in the
2084:, and there's a lot of source overlap with
1796:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
1061:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
729:for all three. They each respectively pass
1911:and needs to be removed from the article:
1833:
1813:
1793:
1557:
1098:
1078:
1058:
850:
338:
318:
433:http://en.m.wikipedia.org/Vice_(magazine)
618:which is most certainly does not fail.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
789:, as others have been pointing out.
1512:The song has charted, so it passes
24:
1230:that entire article be deleted.
292:Non-notable singer that fails
1:
2051:and I do believe she passes
2036:per above and these sources
1595:Discussion has been bundled
1409:and I do believe she passes
1394:per above and these sources
888:Discussion has been bundled
489:and I do believe she passes
474:per above and these sources
2324:
2287:10:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
2270:11:30, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
2246:20:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
845:14:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
821:11:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
65:00:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
2192:00:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
2177:23:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
2145:23:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
2116:22:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
2069:16:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
2029:16:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
1992:16:35, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
1952:00:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
1897:00:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
1873:23:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1848:23:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1828:23:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1808:23:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1787:22:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1768:22:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1615:03:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
1525:03:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
1503:22:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
1470:22:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
1427:16:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
1387:16:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
1362:16:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
1322:00:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
1296:22:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1265:21:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1240:21:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1206:20:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1175:20:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1158:16:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1141:14:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1113:11:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1093:11:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1073:11:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1053:07:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
908:03:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
799:17:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
750:03:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
717:19:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
691:22:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
649:18:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
628:17:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
585:18:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
544:16:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
507:16:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
465:16:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
421:16:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
396:16:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
353:15:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
333:15:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
313:15:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
2296:Please do not modify it.
2206:Please do not modify it.
1575:Please do not modify it.
1535:Please do not modify it.
868:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
534:NOT WP:RS) Cheers!
761:, per my keep vote at
2155:WP:Your first article
1974:is for the song, and
1344:is for the song, and
571:to review a single.~
378:is for the song, and
2090:Catch (Allie X song)
1978:is for the album. ~
1348:is for the album. ~
922:Catch (Allie X song)
914:Catch (Allie X song)
759:Catch (Allie X song)
524:. This reference #3
382:is for the album. ~
125:Catch (Allie X song)
1970:is for the singer,
1859:. I always observe
1340:is for the singer,
374:is for the singer,
514:This reference #1
48:The result was
2225:
2224:
2027:
1990:
1850:
1830:
1810:
1613:
1606:
1603:non-admin closure
1593:procedural close.
1554:
1553:
1523:
1448:nipped in the bud
1385:
1360:
1115:
1095:
1075:
906:
899:
896:non-admin closure
886:procedural close.
819:
748:
741:due to charting.
715:
583:
468:
451:comment added by
419:
394:
355:
335:
54:non-admin closure
2315:
2298:
2284:
2208:
2172:
2163:
2133:
2111:
2102:
2066:
2061:
2023:
2020:
1986:
1983:
1965:
1745:
1744:
1730:
1682:
1670:
1652:
1612:
1610:
1600:
1577:
1558:
1537:
1522:
1520:
1483:
1465:
1456:
1424:
1419:
1381:
1378:
1356:
1353:
1335:
1038:
1037:
1023:
975:
963:
945:
905:
903:
893:
870:
851:
843:
811:
778:Edmonton Journal
747:
745:
711:
708:
686:
677:
604:
579:
576:
504:
499:
467:
445:
415:
412:
390:
387:
369:
287:
286:
272:
224:
212:
194:
166:
148:
120:
102:
61:
59:
34:
2323:
2322:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2305:deletion review
2294:
2280:
2226:
2221:
2215:deletion review
2204:
2170:
2161:
2127:
2109:
2100:
2094:publicity blitz
2062:
2057:
2025:problem solving
2018:
1988:problem solving
1981:
1959:
1687:
1678:
1643:
1627:
1624:
1608:
1591:The result was
1584:deletion review
1573:
1563:
1555:
1550:
1544:deletion review
1533:
1518:
1477:
1463:
1454:
1420:
1415:
1383:problem solving
1376:
1358:problem solving
1351:
1329:
980:
971:
936:
920:
917:
901:
884:The result was
877:deletion review
866:
856:
839:
743:
713:problem solving
706:
684:
675:
598:
581:problem solving
574:
500:
495:
446:
417:problem solving
410:
392:problem solving
385:
363:
229:
220:
185:
169:
139:
123:
93:
77:
74:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2321:
2319:
2310:
2309:
2273:
2272:
2249:
2248:
2223:
2222:
2220:
2219:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2148:
2147:
2119:
2118:
2071:
2031:
1994:
1954:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1900:
1899:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1831:
1811:
1790:
1789:
1748:
1747:
1684:
1623:
1618:
1589:
1588:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1561:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1549:
1548:
1528:
1527:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1442:(which trumps
1429:
1389:
1364:
1324:
1306:
1285:
1284:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1243:
1242:
1208:
1177:
1160:
1143:
1117:
1116:
1096:
1076:
1041:
1040:
977:
916:
911:
882:
881:
861:
858:
857:
854:
849:
848:
847:
824:
823:
801:
752:
722:
721:
720:
719:
694:
693:
651:
630:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
547:
546:
509:
469:
424:
423:
398:
357:
356:
336:
290:
289:
226:
167:
121:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2320:
2308:
2306:
2302:
2297:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2277:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2264:
2263:
2258:
2254:
2251:
2250:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2228:
2227:
2218:
2216:
2212:
2207:
2201:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2156:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2131:
2126:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2117:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2072:
2070:
2067:
2065:
2060:
2054:
2050:
2048:
2046:
2044:
2042:
2040:
2038:
2035:
2032:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2014:
2013:
2008:
2007:
2002:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1984:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1963:
1962:WordSeventeen
1958:
1955:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1936:
1933:
1932:
1924:
1920:
1919:WordSeventeen
1916:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1885:
1882:
1881:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1865:WordSeventeen
1862:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1812:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1792:
1791:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1775:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1760:WordSeventeen
1757:
1753:
1743:
1739:
1736:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1718:
1715:
1712:
1709:
1706:
1703:
1700:
1697:
1693:
1690:
1689:Find sources:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1651:
1647:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1616:
1611:
1604:
1598:
1594:
1587:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1570:
1569:
1567:
1566:
1560:
1559:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1536:
1530:
1529:
1526:
1521:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1481:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1418:
1412:
1408:
1406:
1404:
1402:
1400:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1372:
1368:
1365:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1354:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1333:
1332:WordSeventeen
1328:
1325:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1257:WordSeventeen
1254:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1198:WordSeventeen
1196:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1045:WordSeventeen
1036:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1005:
1002:
999:
996:
993:
990:
986:
983:
982:Find sources:
978:
974:
970:
967:
961:
957:
953:
949:
944:
940:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
918:
915:
912:
910:
909:
904:
897:
891:
887:
880:
878:
874:
869:
863:
862:
860:
859:
853:
852:
846:
842:
841:North America
837:
833:
829:
826:
825:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
779:
774:
773:
768:
764:
760:
756:
753:
751:
746:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
723:
718:
714:
710:
709:
702:
698:
697:
696:
695:
692:
689:
688:
687:
680:
679:
678:
670:
666:
662:
658:
655:
652:
650:
646:
642:
641:EricEnfermero
638:
634:
631:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
608:
602:
601:WordSeventeen
597:
594:
593:
586:
582:
578:
577:
570:
566:
562:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
545:
541:
537:
536:WordSeventeen
533:
530:
526:
523:
519:
516:
513:
510:
508:
505:
503:
498:
492:
488:
486:
484:
482:
480:
478:
476:
473:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
444:
441:
438:
434:
429:
426:
425:
422:
418:
414:
413:
406:
402:
399:
397:
393:
389:
388:
381:
377:
373:
367:
366:WordSeventeen
362:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
337:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
305:WordSeventeen
303:
299:
295:
285:
281:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
235:
232:
231:Find sources:
227:
223:
219:
216:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
189:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
147:
143:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
62:
60:Esquivalience
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2295:
2292:
2281:
2275:
2274:
2261:
2252:
2233:
2229:
2205:
2202:
2169:
2168:
2160:
2159:
2124:
2108:
2107:
2099:
2098:
2073:
2063:
2058:
2033:
2016:
2010:
2004:
1996:
1979:
1967:
1956:
1934:
1883:
1855:Please show
1773:
1749:
1737:
1731:
1723:
1716:
1710:
1704:
1698:
1688:
1675:
1607:
1592:
1590:
1574:
1571:
1534:
1531:
1517:
1509:
1474:
1462:
1461:
1453:
1452:
1431:
1421:
1416:
1391:
1374:
1366:
1349:
1337:
1326:
1308:
1301:
1286:
1279:
1275:
1210:
1179:
1162:
1145:
1120:
1042:
1030:
1024:
1016:
1009:
1003:
997:
991:
981:
968:
900:
885:
883:
867:
864:
827:
804:
776:
770:
754:
742:
726:
704:
683:
682:
674:
673:
664:
653:
632:
595:
572:
568:
564:
560:
555:
511:
501:
496:
471:
447:— Preceding
427:
408:
400:
383:
371:
360:
291:
279:
273:
265:
258:
252:
246:
240:
230:
217:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
2282:Dr. Blofeld
2153:Please see
2080:. EP fails
2053:WP:MUSICBIO
1714:free images
1629:CollXtion I
1621:CollXtion I
1489:, like the
1411:WP:MUSICBIO
1215:WP:AVOIDCOI
1007:free images
787:WP:MUSICBIO
767:CollXtion I
731:WP:MUSICBIO
701:WP:NOTPAPER
661:WP:MUSICBIO
491:WP:MUSICBIO
437:WP:MUSICBIO
405:WP:MUSICBIO
256:free images
171:CollXtion I
2262:Ritchie333
2184:SanctuaryX
2137:SanctuaryX
2130:Miniapolis
2082:WP:NALBUMS
2001:WP:NALBUMS
1944:SanctuaryX
1917:Cheers!
1889:SanctuaryX
1779:SanctuaryX
1756:WP:TOOSOON
1495:SanctuaryX
1480:Miniapolis
1444:WP:NALBUMS
1314:SanctuaryX
1288:SanctuaryX
1253:WP:TOOSOON
1232:SanctuaryX
1150:SanctuaryX
739:WP:NALBUMS
620:SanctuaryX
453:SanctuaryX
443:WP:PRIMARY
403:Satisfies
2301:talk page
2276:Snow keep
2257:WP:NMUSIC
2238:ThaddeusB
2234:Billboard
2211:talk page
2019:ONUnicorn
2006:Billboard
1982:ONUnicorn
1861:WP:BEFORE
1840:• Gene93k
1820:• Gene93k
1800:• Gene93k
1580:talk page
1540:talk page
1514:WP:NSONGS
1377:ONUnicorn
1352:ONUnicorn
1227:WP:NSONGS
1129:WP:NSONGS
1105:• Gene93k
1085:• Gene93k
1065:• Gene93k
873:talk page
735:WP:NSONGS
707:ONUnicorn
637:WP:MUSBIO
616:WP:MUSBIO
575:ONUnicorn
561:about her
556:Billboard
411:ONUnicorn
386:ONUnicorn
345:• Gene93k
325:• Gene93k
298:WP:ARTIST
37:talk page
2303:or in a
2255:- meets
2230:Keep all
2213:or in a
1673:View AfD
1582:or in a
1542:or in a
1371:WP:NSONG
1133:Kokoro20
966:View AfD
875:or in a
817:contribs
791:Kokoro20
772:Exclaim!
461:contribs
449:unsigned
215:View log
50:keep all
39:or in a
2125:Comment
2096:to me.
2086:Allie X
2078:Allie X
2055:#2... –
1957:Comment
1935:Comment
1774:Comment
1720:WP refs
1708:scholar
1646:protect
1641:history
1475:Comment
1436:Allie X
1413:#2... –
1327:Comment
1309:Comment
1302:Comment
1276:Comment
1211:Comment
1180:Comment
1163:Comment
1013:WP refs
1001:scholar
939:protect
934:history
828:Comment
809:Goyston
783:Allie X
765:. Keep
757:: Keep
659:(meets
657:Allie X
596:Comment
512:Comment
493:#2... –
361:Comment
262:WP refs
250:scholar
188:protect
183:history
142:protect
137:history
96:protect
91:history
79:Allie X
71:Allie X
2171:apolis
2110:apolis
1999:Meets
1857:WP:AGF
1752:WP:GNG
1692:Google
1650:delete
1609:Erpert
1519:Erpert
1491:WP:MUS
1487:WP:GNG
1464:apolis
1440:WP:GNG
1369:Meets
1312:again.
1255:.
1219:WP:GNG
1188:WP:GNG
1184:WP:OWN
1167:Boleyn
1125:WP:GNG
985:Google
943:delete
902:Erpert
785:, per
744:Erpert
685:apolis
669:WP:GNG
612:WP:MUS
607:WP:GNG
529:WP:GNG
522:WP:GNG
440:WP:MUS
294:WP:GNG
234:Google
192:delete
146:delete
100:delete
2074:Merge
2059:Davey
1940:WP:RS
1909:WP:RS
1735:JSTOR
1696:books
1680:Stats
1667:views
1659:watch
1655:links
1510:Keep.
1432:Merge
1417:Davey
1223:WP:RS
1192:WP:RS
1028:JSTOR
989:books
973:Stats
960:views
952:watch
948:links
665:merge
497:Davey
277:JSTOR
238:books
222:Stats
209:views
201:watch
197:links
163:views
155:watch
151:links
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
2253:Keep
2242:talk
2188:talk
2162:Mini
2141:talk
2101:Mini
2088:and
2064:2010
2034:Keep
2015:. ~
2012:Time
2009:and
1997:Keep
1950:) :
1948:talk
1923:talk
1895:) :
1893:talk
1884:Keep
1869:talk
1844:talk
1824:talk
1804:talk
1785:) :
1783:talk
1764:talk
1728:FENS
1702:news
1663:logs
1637:talk
1633:edit
1597:here
1499:talk
1455:Mini
1422:2010
1392:Keep
1367:Keep
1320:) :
1318:talk
1294:) :
1292:talk
1283:see.
1261:talk
1238:) :
1236:talk
1202:talk
1171:talk
1156:) :
1154:talk
1146:Keep
1137:talk
1127:and
1121:Keep
1109:talk
1089:talk
1069:talk
1049:talk
1021:FENS
995:news
956:logs
930:talk
926:edit
890:here
813:talk
805:Keep
795:talk
775:and
755:Keep
737:and
727:keep
703:. ~
676:Mini
654:Keep
645:Talk
635:per
633:Keep
624:talk
614:and
569:Time
565:Time
554:The
540:talk
502:2010
472:Keep
457:talk
428:Keep
401:Keep
349:talk
329:talk
309:talk
302:WP:N
300:AND
270:FENS
244:news
205:logs
179:talk
175:edit
159:logs
133:talk
129:edit
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
2076:to
1742:TWL
1671:– (
1434:to
1305:it.
1035:TWL
964:– (
663:),
284:TWL
213:– (
2278:♦
2244:)
2190:)
2157:.
2143:)
1871:)
1846:)
1838:.
1826:)
1818:.
1806:)
1798:.
1766:)
1758:.
1722:)
1665:|
1661:|
1657:|
1653:|
1648:|
1644:|
1639:|
1635:|
1599:.
1516:.
1501:)
1450:.
1280:my
1263:)
1204:)
1173:)
1139:)
1131:.
1111:)
1103:.
1091:)
1083:.
1071:)
1063:.
1051:)
1015:)
958:|
954:|
950:|
946:|
941:|
937:|
932:|
928:|
892:.
815:,
797:)
733:,
647:)
639:.
626:)
542:)
463:)
459:•
351:)
343:.
331:)
323:.
311:)
296:,
264:)
207:|
203:|
199:|
195:|
190:|
186:|
181:|
177:|
161:|
157:|
153:|
149:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
56:)
2240:(
2186:(
2139:(
2132::
2128:@
1964::
1960:@
1946:(
1925:)
1921:(
1891:(
1867:(
1842:(
1822:(
1802:(
1781:(
1762:(
1746:)
1738:·
1732:·
1724:·
1717:·
1711:·
1705:·
1699:·
1694:(
1686:(
1683:)
1676:·
1669:)
1631:(
1605:)
1601:(
1497:(
1493:.
1482::
1478:@
1334::
1330:@
1316:(
1290:(
1259:(
1234:(
1200:(
1169:(
1152:(
1135:(
1107:(
1087:(
1067:(
1047:(
1039:)
1031:·
1025:·
1017:·
1010:·
1004:·
998:·
992:·
987:(
979:(
976:)
969:·
962:)
924:(
898:)
894:(
803:'
793:(
643:(
622:(
603::
599:@
538:(
455:(
368::
364:@
347:(
327:(
307:(
288:)
280:·
274:·
266:·
259:·
253:·
247:·
241:·
236:(
228:(
225:)
218:·
211:)
173:(
165:)
127:(
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.